Territorial Heterogeneity of Globalization and the New Types of Conflicts


Sergeev V.M.,

Director of the Center for Global Problems, Institute of International Studies, MGIMO University, laris-pulena@rambler.ru

elibrary_id: 1447 |

Kazantzev A.A.,

Chief Research Fellow, Institute of International Studies, MGIMO University, andrka@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 123521 | ORCID: 0000-0002-4845-1391 |

Medvedeva S.M.,

Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, MGIMO University, vetamedvedeva@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 639897 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.01.04
For citation:

Sergeev V.M., Kazantzev A.A., Medvedeva S.M. Territorial Heterogeneity of Globalization and the New Types of Conflicts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 1. P. 44-61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.01.04


The study was carried out with the financial support of MGIMO within the framework of the scientific project No. 1921-01-04 “Security Problems and Regional Conflicts in Central Asia and the South Caucasus: the Policy of the Great Powers and the Interests of Local Elites”.


   Buy a digital version in Polismag

Abstract

The article aims to investigate the interrelations between current crisis of economic globalization, on the one hand, and decay of USA hegemony and escalation of international conflicts, on the otherhand. For this purpose we provide synthesis of theories of hegemony within neoliberalism, neorealism and world-system approach based on theory of transactional economy (D. North) and theory of megalopolises- “global gateways” (D. Andersson), which provides the analysis of territorial distribution of relationships in transactional economy. Thus, in this paper we disprove the widespread statement, that globalization is related to the process of uniform increase of connections between all parts of the world. On the contrary, we conceive globalization as the territorial heterogeneity of relationships based on social heterogeneity of resource allocation in the world. Maintenance of this heterogeneity requires the hegemony in world politics. In the period of decrease of economic growth it provokes the escalation of conflicts. If the period of economic decline coincides with the crisis of hegemony (current situation with Trump administration), it stimulates the crisis of economic globalization. The situation also provokes the vast gap between the world economics’ demands in stability and inability of the system of world politics to maintain it. On its turn, escalation of conflicts related to decrease of level of predictability, decrease of mutual credibility, arms race etc., generates new secondary cycles of instability. Above mentioned processes are the basis of expanding recently multi-level crisis of globalization. Our analysis allows formulating three scenarios of development of this crisis (the transit to multipolar global management, partial return to some period of USA hegemony and “hegemonic cold war” between the USA and China). These scenarios are ranged in terms of level of conflictness and level of negative impact on the world economy. In the risk zone are the semi-peripheral areas, where the most intensive clashes of key world actors take place. The risk zone also encompasses Post-Soviet states. 

Keywords
globalization, global crisis, international conflicts, global gateways, postindustrial economy.


   Buy a digital version in Polismag
References

Arrighi G. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.

Carmody P. 2011. The New Scramble for Africa. Cambridge: Polity.

Fukuyama F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

Gilpin R.G. 1988. The Theory of Hegemonic War. – The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 591-613. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/204816

Gilpin R.G. 1996. No one Loves Political Realist. – Security Studies. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 3-26.

Kazantsev A.A. 2015. Social Capital and Development of Civil Society in Central Asia: A Path Dependency Perspective. – Civil Society and Politics in Central Asia. Ed. by C.E. Ziegler. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky. P. 21-56.

Keohane R.O. 1982. The Demand for International Regimes. – International Organization. Vol. 36. No. 2. P. 325-355. URL: http://rochelleterman.com/ir/sites/default/files/Keohane%201982.pdf (accessed 03.11.2019).

Keohane R.O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kindleberger Ch.P. 1986. Hierarchy versus Inertial Cooperation. – International Organization. Vol. 40. No. 4. P. 841-847.

Lucas E. 2008. The New Cold War. Putin’s Russia and the Threat to the West. Palgrave Macmillan.

McLuhan M. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

McLuhan M., Fiore Q. 1968. War and Peace in the Global Village. New York: Bantam.

Modelski G. 1987. Long Cycles in World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Modelski G. 1996. Evolutionary Paradigm for Global Politics. – International Studies Quarterly. No. 40. P. 321-342.

Rolland N. 2017. China’s Eurasian Century? Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. Seattle, WA; Washington, DC: National Bureau of Asian Research. www.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741018000693

Webb M.C., Krasner S.D. 1989. Hegemonic Stability Theory: an Empirical Assessment. – Review of International Studies. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 193-198.

 

Arrighi G. 2000. Adam Smit v Pekine. Chto poluchil v nasledstvo XXI vek [Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century]. Moscow: Institut obshchestvennogo proektirovaniya. (In Russ.)

Barabanov O.N., Bordachev T.V., Lisovolik YA.D., Luk’yanov F.A., Sushencov A,A., Timofeev I.N. 2018. Zhizn’ v osypayushchemsya mire [Living in Crumbling world]. (In Russ.) URL: http://ru.valdaiclub.com/files/22596 (accessed 03.11.2019).

Braudel F. 2007. Civilisation materielle, economie et capitalisme, XVe-XVIIIe siecle (Russ. ed.: Braudel F. Material’naya civilizaciya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV-XVIII vv. Vol. 3. Moscow: Ves’ mir).

Hantington S. 2003. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (Russ. ed.: Stolknovenie civilizacij. Moscow: AST).

Lukin A., Luzyanin S.G., Xin Li, Denisov I.E., Syroezhkin K.L., Pyatachkova A.S. 2016. Kitajskij global’nyj proekt dlya Evrazii: postanovka zadachi [Chinese Global Project for Eurasia: Target Setting]. Analytical report. Moscow: Nauchnyj expert. (In Russ.) URL: https://centero.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/111-avtor-logo-CHINA2-01.pdf (accessed 03.11.2019).

North D.C. 1997. Instituty, institucional’nye izmeneniya i funkcionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance]. Moscow: Nachala. (In Russ.)

Sergeev V.M., Kazancev A.A. 2007. Network Dynamics of Globalization and the Typology of “Global Gateways”. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 18-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.02.02

Sergeev V.M., Kuz’min A.S., Alekseenkova E.S., Kazancev A.A. 2007. Moscow and St. Petersburg as the Centers of Attraction of Social Networks. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 31-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.02.03

Sergeev V.M., Kazantzev A.A., Petrov K.E. 2017. The Policy of “Mainstream” and Its Alternatives in the Modern Western World: on the Way from the World Economic Crisis to “Impossible Politics? – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 8-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.03.02

Silantieva M.V., Glagolev V.S., Tarasov B. 2017. Philosophy of Cross-Cultural Communication. – International Trends. Vol. 15. No. 49. P. 64-76. (In Russ.) www.doi.org/10.17994/IT.2017.15.2.49.4

Toward the Great Ocean – 3. 2015. International club Valdaj’s report. (In Russ.) URL: http://ru.valdaiclub.com/files/19625 (accessed 03.11.2019).

Vorota v global’nuyu ekonomiku [Gateways to the Global Economy]. 2001. Ed by. O. Andersson, D. Andersson. Moscow: Phasis. (In Russ.)

Wallerstein I. 2001. Analiz mirovyh sistem i situaciya v sovremennom mire [Analysis of World Systems and the Situation in the Modern World]. St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 1, 2020

See also:



Theme of the issue: Russian gateways into the global world. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No2

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Volodin A.G., Kolba A.I., Kudryashova I.V., Lapkin V.V., Lebedeva M.M., Makarenko S.A., Pantin V.I., Plyays Ya.A., Rozov N.S., Sergeev V.M., Chikharyov I.A.,
«Mr. Crisis, How Are You to Be Addressed Now?». – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

Sergeev V.M., Kuzmin A.S., Nechayev V.D., Alekseyenkova Ye.S.,
The Trust and Spatial Interaction of Social Nets. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No2

Rozov N.S.,
Global Crisis in the Context of World Development Megatrends and Prospects of the Russian Policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

Zagladin N.V., Kucherenko A.A.,
Global Crisis: Reasons, Consequences and Russia (Returning to What’s Been Read). – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

 
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991