Developing Relations Between Society and State at the Mega-Political Level
Associate Professor, Department of Political Analysis, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Director, Rethinking Russia, KonkovAE@spa.msu.ruelibrary_id: 541307 |
Researcher, Institute for Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Head of Board, Russian Center for Promotion of International Initiatives, firstname.lastname@example.org_id: 872499 |
The article is based on the results of the research project devoted to the role of the parliamentary diplomacy in the modern world politics. The project is realized by the Rethinking Russia and the Russian Center for Promotion of International Initiatives. The article deals with considering the phenomenon of the parliamentary diplomacy, analyzing its nature and sources. Based on observing multisided dynamics of world politics and global trends in the public-government relations, authors define parliamentary diplomacy with the overall context of public diplomacy as quite a relevant mechanism of the modern international communication. The parliamentary aspect is considered as one of the most illustrative and legitimate institutional conjunction of both government (parliament is a constitutional body of power) and public (MPs are representatives of people, of civil society) nature of the modern communication on the mega-political level. Authors also analyze some relevant practical aspects of the Russian parliamentary diplomacy both at bilateral and multilateral levels. Those include parliamentary assemblies of such international organizations as OSCE, CIS, CSTO etc. There is also some focus on parliamentary tracks at the mega-political level for getting over the challenges modern government and its policy face with.
Fiott D. 2011. On the Value of Parliamentary Diplomacy. – Madariaga Paper. Vol. 4. No. 7. P. 1-6.
Masters L. 2015. South Africa’s Emerging Parliamentary Diplomacy and Soft Power. – Strategic Review for Southern Africa. Vol. 37. No. 2. P. 74-93.
Rusk D. 1955. Parliamentary Diplomacy – Debate vs. Negotiation. – World Affairs Interpreter. Vol. XXVI. No. 2. P.123-138.
Šabič Z. 2008. Building Democratic and Responsible Global Governance: The Role of International Parliamentary Institutions. – Parliamentary Affairs. Vol. 61. No. 2. P. 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm062
Drozdovskaya Yu.V. 2017. Parliamentary Diplomacy of Saint Petersburg in the Region of the Baltic Sea (Example of the Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference). – Success of Modern Science and Education. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 129-133. (In Russ.)
Kamucheva V.E. 2016. Parliamentary Diplomacy and Foundations for Inter-Parliamentary Relations of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. – Science Almanac. No. 4-4 (18). P. 62-65. (In Russ.)
Karpenko I.V., Toropygin A.V. 2010. Parliamentary Diplomacy in the Multilateral International Relations (Example of the IPA EurAsEC Standing Commission on Trade Policy and International Cooperation). – Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics. No. 7. P. 150-154. (In Russ.)
Khosseiniyan Kh.N. 2009. Importance of the Parliamentary Diplomacy and Interparliamentarian Cooperation Groups for the Integration Development in Asia. – Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics. No. 6. P. 27-28. (In Russ.)
Kogut V.G. 2016. Topical Issues of International Security in Line with the CSTO Parliamentary Diplomacy. – Administrative Consulting. No. 5 (89). P. 42-52. (In Russ.)
Kondrashova E.V. 2008. Parliamentary Diplomacy in Realization of the Foreign Policy Strategy of Russia. – Sociology of Power. No. 3. P. 215-218. (In Russ.)
Konkov A.E. 2016. The Softer One, the Stronger It: Hybridization of Power. – Comparative Politics Russia. No. 7. P. 151-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-4(25)-151-160
Kosachev K.I. 2016. Inter-Parliamentary Union: If Mountain Has Brought Forth Mouse or Intervention Into Nonintervention. – International Affairs. No. 11. P. 6-17. (In Russ.)
Kudryavtsev A.F. 2008. Experience of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation in Developing Parliamentary Diplomacy and Regional Cooperation in Eurasia. – Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics. No. 3. P. 31-35. (In Russ.)
Lebedeva M.M. 2015. Public Diplomacy in Conflict Resolution. – International Trends. Vol. 13. No. 4 (43). P. 45-56. (In Russ.)
Likhachev V.N. 2009. Parliamentary Diplomacy. – International Affairs. No. 2-3. P. 27-42. (In Russ.)
Parlamentarizm v gosudarstvakh – uchastnikakh Mezhparlamentskoi Assamblei Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv. Pod red. S.L. Tkachenko, D.G. Gladeya [Parliamentarism in the IPA CIS States. Ed. by S.L. Tkachenko, D.G. Gladey]. Sain-Petersburg: Sekretariat Soveta Mezhparlamentskoi Assamblei gosudarstv – uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv. 2017. (In Russ.)
Salmin A.M. 2004. Vneshnepoliticheskiĭ mekhanizm Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Foreign Policy Mechanism of the Russian Federation]. – Sovremennye mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika. [Contemporary International Affairs and World Politics]. Ed. by A.V. Torkunov. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. P. 743-774. (In Russ.)
Solovyov A.I. 2001. Politologiya: Politicheskaya teoriya, politicheskie tekhnologii [Political Science: Political Theory, Political Technologies]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Toropygin A.V. 2007. Parliamentary Element in the Dialectic Development of the International Economic Integration. – Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics. No. 2. P. 63-66. (In Russ.)
Tsygankov P.A. 2003. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Theory of the International Relations]. Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russ.)
Zaitseva A.A. 2015. Parliamentary Diplomacy of BRICS. – International Affairs. No. 13. P. 91-96. (In Russ.)
The intelligent power, public diplomacy, and social networks as a factors of international politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2
Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics: 5 years on track. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No5
Lebedeva M.M., Melville A.Yu.,
Comparative Political Science, World Politics, International Relations: Development of the Subject Spheres. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No4
Introducing the «Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics». – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1
Reflections on modern world politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3