.jpg)
printThe Privatization of Future. New Semantics, Concept & Practice of the Global Society
Neklessa A.I.,
Head of the “North-South” Group at the Center for Civilizational and Regional Studies, Institute for African Studies; Head of the Commission on Socio-Cultural Issues of Globalization; Member of the Bureau of the Academic Council “History of the World Culture” at the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, neklessa@intelros.ru
elibrary_id: 74629 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.02.11
Rubric: DIXI!
For citation:
Neklessa A.I. The Privatization of Future. New Semantics, Concept & Practice of the Global Society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 2. P. 153-166. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.11
Abstract
The world moves toward new semantics, concept and practice of social interactions. Strategic advantage goes to systems able efficiently operate in situations of novelty and uncertainty. Proactive personality, private institutions, cross-border anthropo-social communities replace Leviathan’s hierarchies, which lose previous bureaucratic certainty. Empowerment of individuals means the greater variability of global practices and gradual reconfiguration from the symphony of nations to polyphonic polities: the process, resulting in a different amount of risks. Geo-economic logic replace geo-political codes of action. Yet in the mobile world with elastic architecture, socio-cultural attraction (geo-culture) is going to dominate over both of them, accelerating in its turn the redistribution of human resources over the planet (geo-anthropology). The geo-economic model of the world demonstrates six areas: Transnational region (global governance), North Atlantic West (high technology), Pacific ring of the New East (industrial production), Tropical South belt (raw materials economy), “land-ocean” of the Northern Eurasia (very specific area) and the Deep South (trophy-economy). Forthcoming world’s cartography involves geo-anthropology as the sum of processes and situations that arise during the deployment and redeployment of human resources on the planet, taking into account their quality. When modeling the new status of global community, Modernity-type regulations become invalid and new categorical apparatus emerges, somehow similar to semantics of quantum mechanics with their principles of uncertainty, complementarity etc. Geo-cultural/geo-anthropological atlas represents clusters of glocal objects with complex architecture organized by social gravity. “Heavy” entities emerge where professional/dynamic anthropological resources – intellectual and human capital of humankind concentrate. Russia demonstrates protective reactions to this new Zeitgeist; the sociocultural and anthropological catastrophe produces a deficit of national elite and active civil society. Such situation is a fundamental obstacle in the evolutionary battle for the future.
Keywords
future, evolution, forecasting, methodology, postmodernity, complex society, individuation, geo-culture, geo-anthropology, Russia.
References
Bak P. 1996. How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. New York: Copernicus Press. 212 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5426-1
Experimental Philosophy. 2008. Ed. by J. Knobe, S. Nichols. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 256 p.
Hervieu-Leger D. 2000. Religion as a Chain of Memory. Cambridge: Polity Press; Rutgers University Press. 216 p.
Adorno Th. 2003. Negative dialektik. (Russ. ed.: Adorno Th. Negativnaya dialektika. Мoscow: Nauchnyi mir. 374 p.)
Derrida J. 2000. De la grammatologie. (Russ. ed.: Derrida J. O grammatologii. Мoscow: Ad Marginem. 512 p.)
Foucault M. 1994. Les Mots et les Choses. Une archeologie des sciences humaines. (Russ. ed.: Foucault M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. Saint Petersburg: A-cad. 408 p.)
Fukuyama F. 2004. Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. (Russ. ed.: Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu. Мoscow: AST; Ermak. 730 p.)
Penrose R., Shimony А., Cartwright N., Hawking S. 2008. The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. (Russ. ed.: Penrose R., Shimony А., Cartwright N., Hawking S. Bol’shoe, maloe i chelovecheskii razum. Saint Petersburg: Amfora. 191 p.)
Mandelbrot B. 2002. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. (Russ. ed.: Mandelbrot B. Fraktal’naya geometriya prirody. Мoscow: Institut komp’yuternykh issledovanii (Institute of Computer Science). 656 p.)
Mir v XXI veke: prognoz razvitiya mezhdunarodnoi obstanovki po stranam i regionam. 2018 [The World in the XXI Century: a Forecast of the Development of the International Situation in Countries and Regions]. Ed. by M.V. Aleksandrov, O.E. Rodionov. Moscow: MGIMO University. 768 p. (In Russ.) URL: http://ukros.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/podberezkinai_i_dr_mir_v_xxi_veke.pdf (accessed 02.02.2020).
Neklessa A.I. 2007. A New Ambitious Class. Who Will Carry Out the New Assembly of the World? – Politicheskii klass. No. 9. P. 32‐46. (In Russ.)
Neklessa A.I. 2016. Cultivators of the future. – Actual Problems of Economics and Law. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 22-37. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.2.22-37
Polanyi М. 1985. Personal Knowledge. Towards Post-Critical Philosophy. (Russ. ed.: Polanyi М. Lichnostnoe znanie: Na puti k postkriticheskoi filosofii. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 344 p.)
Prigogine I. 2000. The End of Certainty. Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature. (Russ. ed.: Prigozhin I. Konets opredelennosti. Vremya, khaos i novye zakony prirody. Izhevsk: Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika. 208 p.)
Smith A. 1997. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. (Russ. ed.: Smith A. Teoriya nravstvennykh chuvstv. Мoscow: Respublika. 351 p.)
Smith A. 2017. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. (Russ. ed.: Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. Мoscow: Eksmo. 1056 p.)
Weber М. 1990. Die Protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus. (Russ. ed.: Weber М. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. – Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow: Progress Publishers. P. 44-271).
Content No. 2, 2020
See also:
Kosorukov A.A.,
Globalization: the Trend and the Evolution. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No4
Neklessa A.I.,
The Crises of History. The World as an Unfinished Project. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No1
Zagladin N.V., Kucherenko A.A.,
Global Crisis: Reasons, Consequences and Russia (Returning to What’s Been Read). – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3
Semenenko I.S.,
Evolutionary cycles and problems of forecasting political changes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No1
Akhiyezer A.S.,
Socio-Cultural Prognostication Regarding Russia: Macro- and Microanalytical Levels. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No6
.jpg)
.jpg)