Ethnic Conflict and Forms of Government:
Contemporary Discussions

Zaznaev O.I.,

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia,

elibrary_id: 199322 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.01.03
For citation:

Zaznaev O.I. Ethnic Conflict and Forms of Government: Contemporary Discussions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 1. P. 25-40. (In Russ.).

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 20-011-00102 “The role of form of government in the prevention and resolution of ethnic conflicts: a comparative study”

   Buy a digital version in Polismag


Ethnic conflicts are a danger to the stability and integrity of a state; to prevent and resolve these, the state changes the form of political-territorial structure, the electoral system, or the form of government. The purpose of the article is to provide a critical overview of current discussions in political science regarding the relationship between ethnic conflicts and forms of government. The author focuses on two key points: the influence of ethnicity on the form of government; and the influence of the form of government on ethnic conflict. The choice of the form of government in a divided society is determined by the conceptual approach: supporters of consociationalism believe that the parliamentary system, due to its collegial nature, is the desired design of power in a multi-ethnic society; supporters of centripetalism and power-dividing approach, on the contrary, advocate for the presidential system, since it provides group consensus as well as checks and balances. One of the poorly studied research problems is to find out what is the role of presidential, parliamentary, and semi-presidential systems in resolving ethnic conflicts. The author claims that the impact of the form of government on ethnicity is ambiguous. There are sufficient arguments in favor of the fact that the presidential system reduces the risk of ethnic conflicts and favors ethnic peace and harmony, but at the same time leads to low chances of political representation for ethnic groups. On the other hand, the parliamentary system creates more opportunities for ethnic representation, but increases the risks of ethnic conflicts. The author demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of various forms of government in the context of ethnic contradictions. At the same time, he notes that the form of government is not a determinant of ethnic conflicts, but only a condition, since historical, social, and cultural factors have a stronger impact on ethnic conflicts. 

ethnic conflict, form of government, presidentialism, parliamentarism, semi-presidentialism, ethnic representation.

   Buy a digital version in Polismag

Basedau M. 2013. A Context-Sensitive Approach to the Study of Presidentialism and Ethnic Violence. – Ethnopolitics. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 89-92.

Brancati D. 2006. Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism? – International Organization. Vol. 60. No. 3. P. 651–685.

Cordell K., Wolff S. 2016. The Study of Ethnic Conflict. An Introduction. – The Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict. Ed. by K. Cordell, S. Wolff. New York, London: Routledge. P. 1-12.

Horowitz D. L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press. 607 p.

Horowitz D. L. 1990. Presidents vs. Parliaments: Comparing Democratic Systems. – Journal of Democracy. Vol. 1. No. 4. P. 73-79.

Horowitz D. L. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press. 293 p.

Horowitz D. L. 2004. The Alternative Vote and Interethnic Moderation. A Reply to Fraenkel and Grofman. – Public Choice. Vol. 121. No. 3-4. P. 507-517.

Hutchinson J., Smith A.D. 1996. Introduction. – Ethnicity. Ed. by J. Hutchinson, A.D. Smith. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. P. 3-15.

Kaufman S.J. 2016. Ethnicity as a Generator of Conflict. – The Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict. Ed. by K. Cordell, S. Wolff. New York, London: Routledge. P. 91-101.

Lijphart A. 1990. The Southern European Examples of Democratization: Six Lessons for Latin America. – Government and Opposition. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 68-84.

Lijphart A. 1991. Constitutional Choices for New Democracies. – Journal of Democracy. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 72-84.

Lijphart A. 2007. Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 305 p.

Linz J.J. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. – Journal of Democracy. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 51-69.

McGarry J. 2013. Is Presidentialism Necessarily Non-collegial? – Ethnopolitics. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 93-97.

Reilly B. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies. Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232 p.

Rothchild D., Roeder P. G. 2005. Dilemmas of State-Building in Divided Societies. – Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars. Ed. by P.G. Roeder, D. Rothchild. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. P. 1-25.

Ross M.H. 2007. Cultural Contestation in Ethnic Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 388 p.

Saideman S.M., Lanoue D.J., Campenni M., Stanton S. 2002. Democratization, Political Institutions, and Ethnic Conflict: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis, 1985-1998. – Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 103-129.

Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. 1999. Ed. by R. Elgie. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 320 p.

Sisk T.D. 1996. Power Sharing and International Mediation in Ethnic Conflicts. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press. 176 p.

Schneider G., Wiesehomeier N. 2008. Rules That Matter: Political Institutions and the Diversity–Conflict Nexus. – Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 183-203.

Smith A.D. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. NY: Wiley-Blackwell. 312 p.

Stepan A., Skach C. 1993. Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism. – World Politics. Vol. 46. No. 1. P. 1-22.

Suberu R. T., Diamond L. 2002. Institutional Design, Ethnic Conflict Management, and Democracy in Nigeria. – The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy. Ed. by A. Reynolds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 400-428.

Theuerkauf U.G. 2010. Institutional Design and Ethnic Violence: Do Grievances Help to Explain Ethnopolitical Instability? – Civil Wars. Vol. 12. No. 1-2. P. 117-139.

Theuerkauf U. G. 2013a. Presidentialism and the Risk of Ethnic Violence. – Ethnopolitics. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 72-81.

Theuerkauf U. G. 2013b. Presidentialism and the Risk of Ethnic Violence: A Reply to Reilly, Sisk, Basedau and McGarry. – Ethnopolitics. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 98-103.

Wolff S. 2005. Electoral-Systems Design and Power-Sharing Regimes. – Powersharing. New Challenges for Divided Societies. Ed. by I. O’Flynn, D. Russell. London, Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press. P. 59-74.

Wolff S. 2011. Managing Ethno-national Conflict: Towards an Analytical Framework. – Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 162-195.


Borisov N. 2018. Prezidentstvo na postsovetskom prostranstve. Protsessy genezisa i transformatsii [Presidency in the Post-Soviet Space: the Processes of Genesis and Transformations]. Moscow: RGGU. 537 p. (In Russ.)

Farukshin M. 2013. Ehtnichnost’ i federalizm [Ethnicity and Federalism]. Kazan: Kazan: Center for Innovative Technologies. 348 p. (In Russ.)

Farukshin M. 2014. Ehtnopolitologiya [Ethnopolitical Science (Ethnopolitics)]. Kazan: Kazan University Publishing House. 280 p. (In Russ.)

Horowitz D. L. 2016. Ethnic Power Sharing: Three Big Problems. (Review). – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 210-223. (In Russ.)

Kharitonova O. 2014. Post-Soviet Constitutions: Do Institutions Only Matter? – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 69-93. (In Russ.)

Kharitonova O. 2016. Ethnic Wars and Post-Conflict Democracy. – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 34-59. (In Russ.)

Kudryashova I. 2016. How to Accomplish Stability in Divided Societies. – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 15-33. (In Russ.)

Lijphart A. 1997. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (Russ. ed.: Lijphart A. Demokratiya v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh: sravnitel’noe issledovanie. Ed. by A.M. Salmin, G.I. Kamenskaya. Moscow: Aspect Press. 287 p.).

Markarov A. 2014. Semi-Presidential System: Concept Content and Main Characteristics. – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 34-50.

Panov P. 2015. Institutsional’nye modeli organizatsii vlasti v poliehtnicheskikh obshchestvakh: varianty, problemy i resheniya [Institutional Models of Power Organization in Multiethnic Societies: Options, Problems and Solutions]. – Rossiiskaya politicheskaya nauka: Idei, kontseptsii, metody [Russian Political Science: Ideas,

Concepts, Methods]. Ed. by L. Smorgunov. Moscow: Aspekt Press. P. 289-306. (In Russ.)

Tishkov V.A. 2003. Rekviem po ehtnosu. Issledovaniya po sotsial’no-kul’turnoi antropologii [Requiem for Ethnos. Research on Socio-Cultural Anthropology]. Moscow: Nauka. 544 p. (In Russ.)

Zaznaev O.I. 2006. Poluprezidentskaya sistema: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty [Semi-Presidential System: Theoretical and Applied Aspects]. Kazan: Kazan State University. 374 p. (In Russ.)

Zaznaev O.I. 2013. Forma pravleniya kak politicheskii proekt: ot razrabotki do realizatsii [Form of Government as a Political Project: from Development to Implementation]. – Politicheskoe proektirovanie v prostranstve sotsial’nykh kommunikatsii [Political Design in the Space of Social Communications]. Proceedings of the X International Scientific Conference. Part 1. Moscow: LENAND. P. 30-38. (In Russ.)

Zaznaev O.I. 2014. Understanding the Forms of Government in Foreign Political Science: The Latest Debate. – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 10-33. (In Russ.)

Zaznaev O., Sidorov V. 2020. Presidential or Parliamentary System: What Hinds an Ethnic Conflict? – Political Science (RU). No. 4. P. 290-308. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 1, 2021

See also:

Zaznaev O.I.,
Mixed Forms of Government, or How Oil Will Mix with Water. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Russia’s political system: experience of social engineering projections (based on the materials of the ISP report). – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No6

Zaznaev O.I.,
Typology of Forms of Government: Rectification of Mistakes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No1

Sulima I.I.,
The Educational System as Instrument for the Estimation of Post-Soviet Reforms. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No2

Kuvaldin V.B.,
Presidential and Parlamentary Pepublics as Forms of Democratic Transit (Russian and Ukrainian Experience in the Global Context). – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No5



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
1 2003

Blyakher L.Ye.
Power Games in a Crisis-Stricken Socium: Transformation of the Russian Institutional Structure

 The article text (электронная версия)


   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991