Interface Between Political Science and Political Discourse:
Conflict Dimension


Gaman-Golutvina O.V.,

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ogaman@mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 250180 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2660-481X |

Nikitin A.I.,

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia; Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, an@inno.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 637132 |

Arteev S.P.,

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia; Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, artsp7@yandex.ru

elibrary_id: 862267 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.02.10
Rubric: Laboratory

For citation:

Gaman-Golutvina O.V., Nikitin A.I., Arteev S.P. Interface Between Political Science and Political Discourse: Conflict Dimension. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 2. P. 139-156. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.02.10


The article and creation of the on-line library of books, articles, reports, documents were supported by the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research and the Expert Institute for Social Studies within the framework of the project No. 20-011-31341 “Applied Technologies of Analysis, De-escalation and Settlement of Internal-political and International-political Conflicts (based upon systematized materials of conflicts on the Post-Soviet space and conflicts involving Russia in Far Abroad)”.


Abstract

The article approaches the phenomena of modern political conflicts and conflict studies, with the intention of providing an adequate level of information and scientific-educational resources to provide a basis for public political discourse. The authors introduce a new unique interface for political scientists that connects political science to public political discourse – an electronic resource of systematized literature on political science and political documents in the format of an online library of books, articles, reports, documents (Domestic Politics of Russia and International Politics). This resource has been created by the Russian Political Science Association and Institute for International Studies of the MGIMO University with support from the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research and the Expert Institute for Social Research. It suggests new cataloguing system for political science literature by 59 thematic clusters that represent a renewed classification of political science subdisciplines and thematic areas. Among other types of information, this new resource covers political science publications from major Russian publishing houses specializing in humanitarian scientific literature and textbooks, as well as the most advanced scientific articles published by 25 Russian political science journals. The resource is intended to provide information and bibliographical support underlying modern scientific discourse in Russia focused on urgent issues of Russian domestic politics and international politics. 

Keywords
political conflict, political discourse, information technologies, information resources, domestic politics, international politics, on-line libraries.


References

Gaman-Golutvina O. 2007. Political Elites in the Commonwealth of Independent States: Recruitment and Rotation Tendencies. – Comparative Sociology. Vol. 6. No. 1-2. P. 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913307X208140

Gaman-Golutvina O. 2008. The Changing Role of the State and State Bureaucracy in the Context of Public Administration Reforms: Russian and Foreign Experience. – Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270701840449

Gaman-Golutvina O. 2014. Parliamentary Representation and MPs in Russia: Historical Retrospective and Comparative Perspective. – Parliamentary Elites in Central and Eastern Europe. Recruitment and Representation. Ed. by E. Semenova, M. Edinger, H. Best. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. P. 241-260.

Gaman-Golutvina O. 2018. Political Elites in the USA under George W. Bush and Barack Obama: Structure and International Politics. – Historical Social Research. Vol. 43. No. 4. P. 141-163. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.43.2018.4.141-163

Kaase M. 2000. Political Science and the Internet. – International Political Science Review. Vol. 21. No. 3. Р. 265-282. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1601236 (accessed: 18.01.2021).

Nikitin A. 2020. Legal Norms or Ad Hoc Fixes? International Legal Aspects of Russian Military Involvements in the Caucasus. – Caucasus Survey. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2020.1759893

Welsch W. 1987. Unsere Postmoderne Moderne. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora. 344 p.

 

Avtsinova G. 2019. Policy of Digitalization in Modern Russia: Features of Formation and Prospect of Development. – PolitBook. No. 4. P. 6-20. (In Russ.)

Batygin G.S. 2001. Soсiology in Internet: Scholarship and Education in Virtual Space. – Sociological Journal (Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal). No. 1. P. 180-196. (In Russ.)

Biblioteka otechestvennoi obshchestvennoi mysli s drevneishikh vremen do nachala XX veka [Library of Russian Social Thought from Ancient Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century (a Set of 118 books)]. 2010. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

Eco U. 1997. Postille al nome della rosa. (Russ. ed.: Eco U. Zametki na polyakh “Imeni rozy”. – Eco U. Imya rozy. Moscow: AST. P. 596-644 ).

Gaman-Golutvina O.V. 2019. Overcoming Methodological Differences: The Debate about Knowledge Politics in an Age of Uncertainty. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 5. P. 19-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.05.03

Glukhova A.V., Timofeeva L.N. 2016. Russian Political Conflictology: State and Problems. – Political Science (RU). No 2. P. 13-37. (In Russ.)

Nikitin A.I. 2016. Evolution of Conflict Studies in the International Security Context in Post-Soviet Russia. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. No. 5. P. 48-62. (In Russ.)

Nikitin A., Bolgova I., Nikitina Yu. 2020. Activities of Non-Governmental Organisations Aimed at Conflict Settlement in Post-Soviet States. – Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 8. No. 2. 428-441. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.2.472

Proshanov S.L. 2008. Sotsiologiya konfliktov: Istoriya, teoriya, sovremennost’ [Sociology of Conflicts: History, Theory, Modernity]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House. 232 p. (In Russ.)

Pruzhinin B.I. 2018. – Lektorsky V.A. et al. Contemporary Tendencies of Epistemology’s Development (Round Table Discussion). – Voprosy Filosofii. No. 10. P. 31-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440001151-1

Razvitie nauki v ehpokhu tsifrovizatsii: problemy, tendentsii, prognozy [Development of Science in the Era of Digitalization: Problems, Trends, Forecasts]. 2019. Ed. by M.V. Posnova. Petrozavodsk: Mezhdunarodnyi tsentr nauchnogo partnerstva “Novaya nauka”. 250 p. (In Russ.)

Smorgunov L.V. 2002. Resursy sovremennoi sravnitel’noi politologii v Internete [Resources of Contemporary Comparative Politics on the Internet]. – Smorgunov L.V. Sovremennaya sravnitel’naya politologiya [Modern Comparative Political Science]. Moscow: ROSSPEHN. P. 401-417.

Solovyov A.I. 2018. Crises and “Crisis”: How to Treat Cognitive Conflicts of Political Science? – Political Science (RU). No. 1. P. 105-121. (In Russ.)

Timofeeva L.N. 2020. Introducing the Issue. – Political Science (RU). No. 3. P. 9-12. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 2, 2021

See also:


Tkhagapsoyev Kh.G.,
In search of a new methodological paradigm in political science: the identity approach. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No4

Timofeyeva L.N.,
Political communicativistics: problems of the formation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5


Subdiscipline: Information technologies in politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Pivovarov Yu.S., Bol’shakov C.V., Vinyukov I.A., Smirnov V.V., Ilyin M.V., Chubays I.B.,
Information and Intellectual Resources at the Service of Free and Democratic Elections. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No5

Kapustin B.G.,
Theses on political philosophy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
5 2004


Peskov D.N.
Argumentation against the Background of Consent

 The article text
 

Archive

   2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991