Leadership in Local Communities:
Who Is Needed in the Municipal Government in Russia
Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, email@example.com_id: 474352 | ORCID: 0000-0002-7980-3150 |
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.org_id: 143431 | ORCID: 0000-0002-5616-9660 | RESEARCHER_ID: M-6506-2015
This research was supported by RFBR, project No. 20-011-31192 opn.
The article presents the outcomes of an empirical study of power and leadership in local communities. The study was conducted in 2011-2015 and 2018-2020 in three small towns and one district in three regions of Russia. The basic material was obtained in the course of 86 in-depth face to face interviews with the regional public officials and experts, local politicians, officials, businessmen, and civic activists. We studied opinions of local elites about local leadership. Who should be a leader in a local community, can he overcome the problems caused by objective circumstances, what is the role played by his team, etc. The study shows that the inclusion of the municipalities in the “power vertical” built in the last decade did not lead to an underestimation of the role of leadership by local elites. Leaders are still in demand both by communities and elites. The majority of representatives of urban elites, as the study has shown, believe that the head of the town is, first of all, a leader, and secondarily – an executor, realizing the will of higher authorities. Only real leaders of urban communities have a chance to successfully overcome adverse situations. The leader’s power and the effectiveness of his activities are largely depend on the presence or absence of a professional and motivated group of followers – a team of like-minded people who support the leader and ensure the implementation of his policies. The study showed that in all local communities there are problems with the formation of a team, mainly due to the limited human resources of a small town. Many our respondents are quite optimistic about the leadership potential of town heads and their ability to influence the current situation. They emphasize that only leaders, not just executives really have a chance to significantly influence the situation.
Bentzena T., Lob C., Winsvoldc M. 2020. Strengthening Local Political Leadership Through Institutional Design: How and Why. – Local Government Studies. Vol. 46. No. 3. P. 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1690994
Burns J.M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Copus C., Roberts M., Wall R. 2017. Local Government in England: Centralisation, Autonomy and Control. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Grant B., Dollery B., Kortt M. 2016. Recasting Leadership Reform in Australian Local Government: A Typology from Political Theory. – Local Government Studies. Vol. 42. No 6. P. 1024-1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.861820
Greasley S., Stoker G. 2009. Urban Political Leadership. – Theories of Urban Politics. Ed. by J. Davies, D. Imbroscio. London: Sage. P. 125-136.
Keohane N. 2014. Western Political Thought. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Ed. by R.A.W. Rhodes, P. ‘t Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowndes V., Leach S. 2004. Understanding Local Political Leadership. – Local Government Studies. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 557-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300393042000333863
Stone C. 1995. Political Leadership in Urban Politics. – Theories of Urban Politics. Ed. by J. Davies, D. Imbroscio. London: Sage. P. 96-116.
‘t Hart P., Rhodes R.A.W. 2014. Puzzles of Political Leadership. – The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Ed. by R.A.W. Rhodes, P. ‘t Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653881.013.028
Blondel J. 1992. Political Leadership: Towards a General Analysis. (Russ. ed.: Blondel J. Politicheskoe liderstvo: put’ k vseob”emlyushchemu analizu. Moscow: Rossiiskaya akademiya upravleniya).
Gaman-Golutvina O.V. 2007. Politicheskie elity i politicheskoe liderstvo [Political Elites and Political Leadership]. – Politologiya. Leksikon [Political Science. Lexicon]. Ed. by A.I. Solovyov. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)
Petukhov R.V. 2017. The Russian Society’s Confidence in the Local Governments as a Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 6. P. 61-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.06.05
Shestopal Ye.B. 2013. Political Leadership in New Environment: The Change of the Perception Paradigm. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 47-57. (In Russ.)
Shkel S.N. 2020. Political Attitudes of Local Elites in Contemporary Russia (Cases of Municipalities of the Perm Territory). – Polis. Political Studies. No. 6. P. 119-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.06.09
Solovyov A.I. 2017. Political Leader in the Public Administration Environment, or Who Is the Man of the House? – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 60-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.05
Vlast’ i lidery v vospriyatii rossiiskikh grazhdan. Chetvert’ veka nablyudenii (1993-2018) [Power and Leaders in the Perception of Russian Citizens. a Quarter Century of Observations (1993-2018)]. 2018. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. (In Russ.)
On Nordic Local Government - Development and Prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No2
Democracy’s organic preferences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2
Donor Towns: the Support of the Federal Center or a Source of Regional Conflicts?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6
Local Self-Government Within the State Governance. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No2
Samarkina I.V., Bashmakov I.S.,
Local Identity and Mechanisms of its Conversion into Constructive Socio-Political Practices of Youth. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No2