Theory and Practice of Modern Criticism (About the Book “A Time for Critique”)


Meshcheryakova N.N. ,

Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia; Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia, natalia.tib@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 611303 | ORCID: 0000-0001-7658-7993 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.02.12
For citation:

Meshcheryakova N.N. Theory and Practice of Modern Criticism (About the Book “A Time for Critique”). – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 2. P. 171-179. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.02.12



   Buy a digital version in Polismag

Abstract

The book “A Time for Critique” (2019. ed. B.E. Harcourt, D. Fassin. New York: Columbia University Press) deals with the current state of critical theory and its practical application in the political and public spheres. The space of criticism is narrowing. This weakness is connected with the fears critical thinkers have regarding mass movement and class struggles, with how impotent criticism is against the background of the weakening of liberal ideology and the strengthening of the right-wings in politics and public life, and with the triumph of positivism in the academic environment, which is understood as the self-worth of a fact to the detriment of its critical thinking. Nevertheless, the authors call for updating and promoting the program of critical social theory. The grounds for optimism are the emergence (under pressure from the external environment) of new forms of critical thinking and activities within the academic sphere, and the emergence of new forms of critical intervention in the form of social movements and other methods of civil society’s self-organization outside the academic schools. 

Keywords
critical theory, critical practices, social fields, positivism, pragmatism.


   Buy a digital version in Polismag
References

A Time for Critique. 2019. Ed. by B.E. Harcourt, D. Fassin. New York: Columbia University Press. 320 p.

Hardt M., Negri A. 2017. Assembly. New York: Oxford University Press. 368 p.

Seron C. 2016. The Two Faces of Law and Inequality: From Critique to the Promise of Situated, Pragmatic Policy. – Law and Society Review. Vol. 50. No. P. 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12194

 

Bourdieu P. 2005. Espace social et genese des classes (Russ. ed.: Bourdieu P. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo: polya i praktiki. St. Petersburg: Aletheia; Moscow: Institute of experimental sociology. 576 p.).

Horkheimer M. 2011. Eclipse of Reason (Horkheimer M. Zatmenie razuma. K kritike instrumental’nogo razuma. Moscow: Canon+ROOI Rehabilitation. 224 p. (In Russ.)

Kapustin B.G. 2001. The End of “Transitology”? (Reflecting on the First Post-Communist Decade as Subject of Theoretical Interpretation). – Polis. Political Studies. No. 4. P. 6-26. (In Russ.)

Neklessa A.I. 2013. Ongoing Plebiscite. Genetics of Civil Society. – Polis. Political Studies. № 2. P. 24-39. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.politstudies.ru/article/4684 (accessed 16.01.2020).

Nikovskaya L.I. 2012. Civil Society and Protests: What is behind that? – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 4. P. 5-13. (In Russ.) URL: https://book.wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/monitoring/2012/110/2012_110_01_nikolskaya.pdf (accessed 16.01.2020).

Oganisyan Yu.S. 2020. Phenomenon of Totalitarianism: Exit to the Twenty-First Century. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 167-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.12

Simakova M.A. 2018. Political Reaction as Passive Revolution: Attempting a Conceptualization. – Sociology of Power. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 47-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2018-4-47-68

Toshchenko Z.T. 2011. Kentavr-problema (Opyt filosofskogo i sotsiologicheskogo analiza) [Centaur-Problem (Experience of Philosophical and Sociological Analysis)]. Moscow: Novyi khronograph. 536 p. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 2, 2021

See also:


Titov K.A.,
Pragmatism in Politics and the Prospects for the Development of Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No2

Sudakov S.S.,
Epistemology of political pragmatism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1

Inoguchi T.,
Political theory. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3

Vafin A.M.,
Political marginality: theoretical and practical aspects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No4

Beck U.,
Living in and coping with world risk society: the cosmopolitan turn. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No5

 
 

Archive

   2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991