.jpg)
printThe global “green imperative”:
Russia’s place in the international climate regime
Maslova E.A.,
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Moscow, Russia; The Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; HSE University, Moscow, Russia, e.maslova@inno.mgimo.ru
elibrary_id: 683669 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2493-3900 | RESEARCHER_ID: J-3216-2013
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.01.03
For citation:
Maslova E.A. The global “green imperative”: Russia’s place in the international climate regime. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 1. P. 19-30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.01.03
The study was supported by MGIMO University, project No. 1921-01-06.
Abstract
This article is devoted to the political science analysis of the international climate regime, Russia’s position regarding the implementation of its principles and the EU climate regime. Today, the problem of climate change is fundamental to any society. At the global level, there is an established system of governance under the auspices of the UN, as well as a “green consensus” contending that an increase in the average temperature on Earth is a threat to humankind. The theory of international regimes suggests the existence of an international climate regime, a system of intergovernmental institutions to combat climate change with the UN playing a dominant role (while the participants form a certain common understanding and consensus, and thereby take binding obligations that restrict their actions by established norms and rules). The global consensus is expressed in the implementation of national practices and the development of national approaches. We show that despite the presence of common environmental values, their implementation at the national level occurs in different ways. The Russian approach focuses on adapting to the effects of climate change and finding tools to reduce emissions (by absorbing them, and not only by actually reducing them). This approach is referred to as a loss reduction and benefits reaping strategy. The European Union, already positioning itself as a global environmental leader, is launching a “green perestroika” and opting for a decarbonisation paradigm. This existence of paradigmally different approaches at meso-levels is blurring the system of global environmental governance and leading to its fragmentation. Ultimately, this creates new dividing lines, including ate political and ideological levels. In the medium term, this could contribute to increasing tensions in international relations and world politics.
Keywords
global green imperative, international climate regime, Paris Agreement, climate neutrality, climate change consensus, decarbonization, Russia’s environmental policy, adaptation to the consequences of climate change, Green Deal.
References
Apanovich, M., Barabanov, O., Cheremisin, P., Maslova, E., Reinhardt, R., & Savorskaya, E. (2020). Climate policy in a global risk society. Moscow: Valdai Discussion Club Report. https://valdaiclub.com/a/reports/climate-policy-in-a-global-risk-society/
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M. J., Newell, P., Paterson, M., Roger, C., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706033
Caspar, O. (2020). The Climate crisis – an opportunity for EU-Russia cooperation. EUREN Brief 11. Germanwatch, Bonn. http://eu-russia-expertnetwork.eu/en/analytics/euren-brief-11
Denisov, I. (2016). Chinese and Western values in modern political discourse in China. Social Sciences (Russian Federation), 47(2), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.21557/ssc.46698029
Gardiner, S.M. (2004). Ethics and global climate change. Ethics, 114(3), 555-600. https://doi.org/10.1086/382247
Gardiner, S.M. (2006). A Perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values, 15(3), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327106778226310
Gardiner, S.M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: the ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379440.001.0001
Gautam, S. (2020). COVID-19: air pollution remains low as people stay at home. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13, 853-857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00842-6
Haas, P.M., Keohane, R.O., & Levy, M.A. (1993). Institutions for the Earth: sources of effective international environmental protection. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention. The divisive politics of climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316105542
Hall, N. (2016). The institutionalisation of climate change in global politics. In: G. Sosa-Nunez, E. Atkins (Ed.), Environment, climate change and international relations (pp. 60‑74). Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing.
Healy, R.G., VanNijnatten, D.L., & López-Vallejo, M. (2014). Environmental policy in North America: approaches, capacity, and the management of transboundary issues. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Keohane, R.O. (2015). The global politics of climate change: challenge for political science. Political Science & Politics, 48(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S1049096514001541
Krasner S.D. (Ed.) (1983). International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lucatello, S. (2016). Global climate change finance. In: G. Sosa-Nunez, E. Atkins (Ed.), Environment, climate change and international relations (pp. 131-142). Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing.
Maslova, E. (2021). G 20: What is food (un)security and why it matters. ISPI Commentary. https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/g20-what-food-unsecurity-and-why-it-matters-30087
Milner, H. (1992). International theories of cooperation among nations: strengths and weaknesses. World Politics, 44(3), 466-496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546
O’Neill, K. (2017). The environment and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/61675/frontmatter/9781107061675_frontmatter.pdf
Paterson, M. (1995). Radicalising regimes? ecology and the critique of IR theory. In J. MacMillan, & A. Linklater (Ed.), New Directions in International Relations (pp. 212-227). London: Pinter.
Pereira, J.C. (2015). Environmental issues and international relations, a new global (dis)order – the role of International Relations in promoting a concerted international system. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 58(1), 191-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201500110
Redclift, M. (1996). Wasted: counting the costs of global consumption. London: Earthscan.
Sosa-Nunez, G. (2016). Transversal environmental policies. In G. Sosa-Nunez, E. Atkins (Ed.), Environment, climate change and international relations (pp. 87-98). Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing.
Susskind, L.E. (1994). Environmental diplomacy: negotiating more effective global agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, M., Liu, F., & Zheng, M. (2021). Air quality improvement from COVID-19 lockdown: evidence from China. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health,14. 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00963-y
Ecology and economics: the trend towards decarbonization. (2020). Bulletin on current trends in the Russian Economy, 66. (In Russ.) https://e-cis.info/upload/iblock/520/520a5eee087274f9007f341e5865b0b3.pdf
Khakhalkina, E.V. (2020). EU in the modern world: problems of regional policy and foreign political identity. Contemporary Europe, 5, 204-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope52020204213 (In Russ.)
Krasnoshchekov, V.N., & Olgarenko, D.G. (2019). Assessment of the efficiency of realization of the national project “Ecology”. Prirodoustroistvo, 2, 6-11. (In Russ.)
Savorskaya, E.V. (2015). European Union in the global climate regime: organizational analysis. Moscow University Journal of World Politics, 6(3), 150-173. (In Russ.) https://fmp.msu.ru/attachments/article/341/SAVORSKAYA_2015_2.pdf
Tsygankov, P.A. (2007). Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Theory of international relations]. Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russ.)
Content No. 1, 2022
See also:
Arbatova N.K.,
Climate threats – a new dimension of EU security. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No6
Kazantzev A.A.,
Liberal approach to russian foreign policy. Notes on the margins of the book by V. Petrovsky. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No2
Round Table Of The Political Science Faculty, Moscow State University, Shestopal Ye.B., Urnov M.Yu., Komarovsky V.S., Mezhuyev B.V., Fedosov P.A., Salutskiy A.S., Solovyov A.I., Shtukina T.A., Gulbinskiy N.A., Nesterova S.V., Zverev A.L., Selezneva A.V., Titov V.V., Streletz I.E., Rogozar-Kolpakova I.I.,
The crisis in the mirror of political psychology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5
Malakhov V.S.,
Immigration regimes in Western States and in Russia: the political theory aspects. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4
Goncharov D.V.,
Structure of territorial politics in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3
.jpg)
.jpg)