Interpretations of “diplomacy for science” by Russian scholars and diplomats




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.02.09
For citation:

Raynkhardt R.O., Panov A.N. Interpretations of “diplomacy for science” by Russian scholars and diplomats. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 2. P. 115-129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.02.09


The article was prepared in the framework of the MGIMO grant for young researchers under the supervision of doctoral or postdoctoral fellows (project “New Forms and Methods of Diplomacy under Pandemic Conditions” of the XI MGIMO Young Researchers’ Contest “Scientific Idea”).


Abstract

The article concerns the role of ‘diplomacy for science’ as a science diplomacy track facilitating international scientific and technical cooperation. The authors argue that diplomatic practices used to support the said cooperation are conducted at two levels. The macro-level features intergovernmental and interstate cooperation, such as making international agreements on scientific and technical cooperation, while at the micro-level individual scholars or scientific groups are supported by diplomats in their relations with foreign partners. However, there are issues jeopardizing cooperation between diplomats and scientists, and in order to gain insight into the nature of these problems and suggest ways to rectify the situation and so alleviate the struggle of both sides, the authors have conducted a series of semi-structured interviews with representatives of Russian-speaking academia and the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The scientists interviewed have reported legal issues, as well as a lack of consular and visa information, as factors negatively affecting their decision to go abroad for working purposes; the so-called research diaspora is poorly consolidated, subverting efforts to coordinate Russian-speaking researchers outside Russia. The diplomats expressed regret over the absence of formal definitions for such terms as ‘researcher’ and ‘research diaspora’ which effectively hinders the identification of those eligible for diplomatic and consular support within the ‘diplomacy for science’ framework. The support itself is provided unevenly across Russian diplomatic establishments abroad, being dependent on the staffing situation and the Ambassador’s as well as senior diplomats’ personal interest in the matter. At the same time, both scholars and diplomats indicated difficulties in communicating with each other, caused by among other reasons a sense of mutual distrust. Based on the empirical data collected and analyzed, the authors have formulated a number of recommendations for decision-makers to bolster the country’s science diplomacy effort. To enhance consular and visa support, it is suggested that travel for the purposes of scientific exchange be designated as an independent visa category and ‘Scientist IDs’ introduced (similarly to ‘Fan IDs’). To engage more with the research diaspora, it is advisable to define what categories of researchers comprise the said group and offer them eased rules of entry and naturalization. Restarting the existing Internet resources related to scientific exchange alongside launching a specialized online platform integrating such sources would serve to improve the information coverage of Russian science diplomacy. 

Keywords
science diplomacy, diplomacy for science, international scientific and technical cooperation, digital diplomacy, research diaspora, overseas compatriots, scientific policy.


References

Bergeijk, P. van, Groot, H. de, & Yakop, M. (2011). The economic effectiveness of diplomatic representation: an economic analysis of its contribution to bilateral trade. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 1-2, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004209619_007

New frontiers in science diplomacy. Navigating the changing balance of power. (2010). London: The Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/royal_society_content/policy/publications/2010/4294969468.pdf

Reinhardt, R.O. (2021). Russian science diplomacy at a crossroads. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 14(2), 92-106. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-2-77-92-106

 

Dezhina, I.G. (2016). Russian-speaking research diaspora: experience and perspectives of cooperation with Russia. Sociology of Science and Technology, 7(1), 134-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-0910-2016-00009

Dezhina, I.G., Kuznetsov, E.N., Korobkov, A.V., & Vasil’ev, N.V. (2015). Razvitie sotrudnichestva s russkoyazychnoi nauchnoi diasporoi: opyt, problemy, perspektivy [The development of cooperation with the Russian-speaking research diaspora: experience, issues, perspectives. Ed. by I.S. Ivanov]. No 23/2015. Moscow: Spetskniga. (In Russ.)

Formy i modeli mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-tekhnicheskogo sotrudnichestva v Rossii [Forms and models of international scientific and technical cooperation in Russia]. (2019). Moscow: Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, The Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL). (In Russ.) https://riep.ru/upload/iblock/379/3790818969f57cf8e97b5407 d71365e6.pdf (accessed 23.09.2021).

Krasnova, G.A., Reinhardt, R.O., Shakirov, O.I., & Solov’ev, D.B. (2020). Novye gorizonty nauchnoi diplomatii v Rossii: Doklad № 63/2020 [The new horizons of science diplomacy in Russia: report No 63/2020]. Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). Moscow: NP RIAC. (In Russ.)

Malakhov, V.A., Vasil’eva, I.N., & Belov, F.D. (2020). Structure of international migration of researchers. Case study of Russia. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(5), 232-246. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.14

Reinhardt, R.O., & Mozebakh, V.A. (2017). Science attaches’ work: Russian and foreign practices. Human Capital, 12(108), 28-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2017.12.06 

Content No. 2, 2022

See also:


Romanova M.D.,
Influence of Cultural Context on Formation of Science Policy (French Experience). – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No5

Konkov A.E., Chukov R.S.,
Parliamentary Diplomacy: Developing Relations Between Society and State at the Mega-Political Level. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No1

Kostyrev A.G.,
The intelligent power, public diplomacy, and social networks as a factors of international politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Talagayeva D.A.,
Norway: the state science policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1

Pavlov N.V.,
Are diplomats to master psychology?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
2 2015


Korgunyuk Yu.G.
Electoral Corruption. Medical Record

 The article text
 

Archive

   2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991