Network modeling of mass political consciousness. First results


Satarov G.A.,

INDEM Foundation, Moscow, Russia, moskars@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 165292 |

Blagoveshchensky Yu.N.,

INDEM Foundation, Moscow, Russia, vkbun@yandex.ru


elibrary_id: 85428 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.03.10


For citation:

Satarov G.A., Blagoveshchensky Yu.N. Network modeling of mass political consciousness. First results. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 4. P. 124-140. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.03.10



Abstract

The article presents the experience of constructing three networks and a comparative analysis of these, where the nodes are the vectors of respondents’ answers to almost identical sociological questionnaires in three countries – Russia, Kazakhstan, and Estonia. The questionnaires that regarded citizen’s political attitudes and the practices of these three countries were used in polls conducted between the spring and the fall of 1998. The set of respondents’ replies to one questionnaire was represented as a set of binary vectors. These binary vectors correspond to the nodes of the constructed network. At the initial stage, the standardized residuals, as measures of statistical dependence between nodes (response vectors), were used as measures of the connection between nodes. Thus, a weighted network of each survey was obtained. After that, according to the general formal rule of the threshold of determination, a transition was created from a weighted to a binary network. The main subjects of comparative analysis were the topological (structural) properties of such binary networks which are used in studies on networks from different origins. The networks constructed in this way were then used in the study as models of the respondents’ mass consciousness. The authors studied and interpreted the cluster structure of networks that include the structure of a particular degree distribution of network nodes. This helped the authors to obtain significant results concerning the degree of distribution in the networks nodes examined. The hypothesis that these networks shape a separate class of complex networks is confirmed. The study provides sociological facts that could not be found out by traditional methods of statistical analysis of poll results, based on counting the frequency of responses in the whole sample and within the standard groups. These results suggest that the proposed approach allows us to interpret the networks that are constructed by the proposed method as models of mass consciousness, and that this network approach allows new verifiable facts about mass consciousness to be obtained. The authors provide ideas and directions for further scientific research in this field. 

Keywords
sociology of associations, mass consciousness, public opinion polls, complex networks, networks of mass consciousness, topological characteristics of networks, power law.

Дополнительные материалы

References

Clauset, A., Newman, M.E., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E., 70(6), 066111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111

Girvan, M., & Newman, M.E. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821-7826. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799

Newman, M.E.J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45, 2, 167-256. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0303516

Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpre­tations. NeuroImage, 52(3), 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003

van Meter, K.M. (2004). How people see society: the network structure of public opinion concerning social conflicts. CONNECTIONS, 26(1), 71-89.

 

Blagoveshchensky, Yu.N., & Satarov, G.A. (2019). Network modeling of mass political consciousness. a method. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 96-118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.05.08

Knyazeva E.N. (Ed.) (2012). Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya [Evolutionary epistemology]. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. (In Russ.)

Popper, K.R. (2004). Conjectures and refutations. the growth of scientific knowledge. (Russ. ed.: Popper, K.R. Predpolozheniya i oproverzheniya. Rost nauchnogo znaniya. Moscow: AST, Ermak).

Satarov, G.A. (2016a). Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part I. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 121-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.01.09

Satarov, G.A. (2016b). Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part II. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 109-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.02.09

Schutz, A. (2003). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehenden Soziologie. (Russ. ed.: Schutz, A. Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoi sotsiologii. Moscow: Institut Fonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”).

Sztompka, Р. (2001). Pojęcie struktury społecznej: Próba uogólnienia. (Russ. ed.:

Sztompka, Р. The concept of social structure. An attempt to generalize. Sociological Studies, 9, 3-13). 

Content No. 3, 2022

See also:


Blagoveshchensky Yu.N., Satarov G.A.,
Network Modeling of Mass Political Consciousness. A Method. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5

Satarov G.A.,
Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No2

Satarov G.A.,
Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part I. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No1

Chugrov S.V.,
Mikhail Gorshkov’s experience of social diagnostics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6

Kholodkovskii K.G.,
Complex Problems of Modern Public Consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No3

 
 

Archive

   2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991