print

Images of Europe in the discourse of German left- and right-wing populists:
between solidarity Europe and fortress Europe

Svirchevskii D.A.,

HSE University, Moscow, Russia, dasvirchevskiy@edu.hse.ru

ORCID: 0009-0008-1991-719X | RESEARCHER_ID: HNJ-4343-2023

Fomin I.V.,

HSE University, Moscow, Russia; INION RAN, Moscow, Russia; MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, fomin.i@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 638552 | ORCID: 0000-0003-4703-5262 | RESEARCHER_ID: R-8897-2016

Article received: 2021.12.04. Accepted: 2022.08.19


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.02.03
EDN: YGNOEA

Rubric: Theme of the issue: the image of the Other as a factor in world politics

For citation:

Svirchevskii D.A., Fomin I.V. Images of Europe in the discourse of German left- and right-wing populists: between solidarity Europe and fortress Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 2. P. 27-40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.03. EDN: YGNOEA

This research was supported by a grant from the President of the Russian Federation for state support of young Russian scientists – candidates of sciences (№ 075-15-2020-335).

Abstract

The study seeks to understand how German left- and right-wing populists (“Die Linke” and “Alternative für Deutschland”) discursively construct the images of Europe. The toolkit of the discourse-historical approach is applied to analyze the discursive strategies of nomination, predication and argumentation that are used by the two parties to represent Europe as it is and the Europe that is desired. The study is structured based on an analytical framework that distinguishes among three dimensions of the discourses on Europe: the ideational dimension, organizational dimension, and geographical dimension. The results of the analysis show that, in the ideational dimension of the image of Europe, “Die Linke” represents the today’s European Union as a militarized and excessively competitive structure that should instead be focused on protecting human rights as well as promoting peace and solidarity. In its turn, “Alternative für Deutschland” shows the EU as a threat to European cultures and to the sovereignty of European countries. In the organisational dimension of the discourse, both left- and right-wing populists criticize the EU for being undemocratic, but their solutions to this problem are different. While “Alternative für Deutschland” supports the idea of Germany’s withdrawal from the EU, “Die Linke” sees the future of the country only in the context of a united Europe. In the geographical dimension, “Die Linke” criticizes the EU for being too isolated, while it ought to be more open to the outer world. In contrast, “Alternative für Deutschland” emphasizes the insufficient security of the European Union and advocates for its greater closeness. Overall, “Die Linke” constructs the images of Europe mostly on the basis of the topoi of anti-militarism, anti-capitalism, humanitarianism, openness, and democracy, while “Alternative für Deutschland” uses the topoi of culture, history, sovereignty and financial profit. In general, the study shows that although there are a lot of differences in the rhetoric of “Die Linke” and “Alternative für Deutschland”, they both construct arguments against the current EU based on the core populist assumption that the will of the people, democracy, and popular sovereignty must be respected.

Keywords

image of Europe, Europe, populism, Germany, left-wing populism, right-wing populism, discourse analysis, Alternative Deutschland, Die Linke.

Дополнительные материалы

Приложение 

 Full Text

Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: the sceptre and the spectre. In Twenty-First Century Populism (pp. 1-11). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592100_1

Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Casero-Ripolles, A. (2020). Populism Against Europe in social media: the eurosceptic discourse on Twitter in Spain, Italy, France, and United Kingdom during the Campaign of the 2019 European Parliament election. Frontiers in Communication, 5(54), 1-12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00054

Arzheimer, K. (2015). The AfD: finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany? – West European Politics, 38(3), 535-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1004230

Berbuir, N., Lewandowsky, M., & Siri, J. (2015). The AfD and its Sympathisers: finally a right-wing populist movement in Germany? German Politics, 42(2), 154-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2014.982546

Browning, C.S. (2019). Brexit populism and fantasies of fulfilment. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(3), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1567461

Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7

Csehi, R., & Zgut, E. (2021). ‘We won't let Brussels dictate us’: Eurosceptic populism in Hungary and Poland. European Politics and Society, 22(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1717064

Glencross, A. (2020). ‘Love Europe, hate the EU’: a genealogical inquiry into populists’ spatio-cultural critique of the European Union and its consequences. European Journal of International Relations, 26(1), 116-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119850242

Hough, D., & Keith, D. (2019). The German Left Party: a case of pragmatic populism. In G. Katsambekis, & A. Kioupkiolis (Ed.), The Populist Radical Left in Europe (pp. 129-144). London: Routledge.

Hough, K. (2009). Populism personified or reinvigorated reformers? The German Left Party in 2009 and beyond. German Politics and Society, 27(2), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2009.270206

Jacob, F. (2021). The “Decline of the West” as a semiotic strategy against a European Union. In F. Mangiapane, & T. Migliore (Ed.), Images of Europe: The Union between Federation and Separation. P. 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69240-7_7

Kaya, A., & Tecmen, A. (2019). Europe versus Islam? Right-wing populist discourse and the construction of a civilizational identity. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 17(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2019.1570759

Kioupkiolis, A. (2016). Podemos: the ambiguous promises of left-wing populism in contemporary Spain. Journal of Political Ideologies, 21(2), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1150136

Krzyżanowski, M. (2010). The discursive construction of european identities: a multi-level approach to discourse and identity in the transforming European Union. Bern: Peter Lang.

March, L. (2017). Left and right populism compared: the British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 282-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117701753

March, L. (2001). Radical left parties in Europe. London, New York: Routledge.

Mastropaolo, A. (2008). Politics against democracy: party withdrawal and populist breakthrough. In D. Albertazzi, & D. McDonnell (Ed.), Twenty-First Century Populism (pp. 30-48). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592100_3

Montanari, F. (2021). “From an uncertain border”. double, existential and discursive, European crisis: changes of glance, between migrants crisis and climate change. In F. Mangiapane, & T. Migliore (Ed.), Images of Europe: The Union between Federation and Separation (pp. 167-182). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69240-7_12

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Prentoulis, M. (2021). Left populism in Europe: Lessons from Jeremy Corbyn to Podemos. London: Pluto Press.

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3^rd ed. (pp. 23-61). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.

Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266

Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Trimithiotis, D. (2018). Understanding political discourses about Europe: a multilevel contextual approach to discourse. Discourse & Society, 29(2), 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734425

Van Kessel, St. (2015). Populist parties in europe: agents of discontent? London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414113

Wodak, R. (2007). ‘Doing Europe’: the discursive construction of European identities. In Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics (pp. 70-94). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591301_4

Alekseev, A.V., & Fomin, I.V. (2020). “We, the defenders of nations and liberties”. How the EU populist radical right discursively constructs identities: the case of the Rassemblement National. Political Science (RU), 4, 128-156. (In Russ.) http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.04.07

Fomin, I.V. (2018a). Image of state: a semiotic model. METHOD: Moscow Yearbook of Works from Social Science Disciplines, 8, 47-60. (In Russ.)

Fomin, I.V. (2018b). On the semiotic model of image. Slovo.ru: baltijskij accent, 9(2), 37-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2018-2-3 

See also: