print

Non-Western political systems in development:
the case of whole process people’s democracy in China

Chubarov I.G.,

Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, ilya.chubarov@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 685767 | ORCID: 0000-0002-4672-6566 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAJ-5007-2020

Article received: 2024.09.04. Accepted: 2025.02.11


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.03.04
EDN: MGFOLV

Rubric: Theme of the issue: China and Russia – looking at each other

For citation:

Chubarov I.G. Non-Western political systems in development: the case of whole process people’s democracy in China. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.03.04. EDN: MGFOLV (In Russ.)

This article stems from research conducted under grant No. 24-28-00474, Non-Western Political Models: Consultative Democracy in Contemporary China, awarded by the Russian Science Foundation. Dr. A.V. Vinogradov of the Institute of Oriental Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences heads the project team.

Abstract

The numerous political crises in leading Western countries caused an increasing demand to explore alternative ways to organize government institutions. China, in particular, has been of interest, as it introduced a new concept in 2019 called the “whole process people’s democracy” as the next stage of socialist democracy. The new concept emphasizes the importance of institutional solutions working together to strengthen the five democratic pillars of the Chinese political system: elections, consultations, decision-making, governance, and supervision. The analysis conducted by the author revealed that in practice most of the innovative changes have been related to the legislative functions of people’s congresses. Measures include involving citizens more widely in the legislation process, as well as the creation of local advisory groups, digitalization, and initiatives of “open government”. The PRC does not aim to export its model abroad, but its success challenges the dominance of the Western conception of democracy in the global discourse. Additionally, studying Chinese political institutions can serve as inspiration for developing similar mechanisms in other countries, including Russia.

Keywords

PRC, democracy, democratic transition, political system, political institutions, whole process people’s democracy.

Hu, Jieren, & Wu, Tong. (2024). “Whole process people’s democracy” in China: evidence from Shanghai. Chinese Political Science Review, 9(2), 172-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-023-00245-9

Li, Rongxin. (2024). Whole-process people’s democracy. In Democratizing China’s Political Imaginaries (pp. 73-91). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3670-6_3

Li, Rongxin, Chen, Canpu, & Yao, Guangyuan. (2024). Is China selling its democracy overseas, and are Europeans buying? Asian Survey, 64(6), 914-941. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2024.2329501

Youngs, R. (2015). Exploring “non-Western democracy”. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0062

Afonina, L.A., & Vinogradov, A.V. (2022). Narodnyi politicheskii konsul’tativnyi sovet Kitaya [The Chinese people’s political consultative conference]. In A.V. Vinogradov (Ed.), Sovremennoe kitaiskoe gosudarstvo [The Modern Chinese State] (pp. 654-740). Moscow: RAS. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48647/IFES.2022.85.15.022

Burlatskii, F.M., & Mushinskii, V.O. (1986). Narod i vlast’: nauchno-populyarnyi ocherk politicheskoi sistemy sotsializma [People and power: a popular science essay on the political system of socialism]. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)

Chubarov, I.G. (2025). Slozhnosti perevoda kitaiskogo ponyatiya 全过程人民民主 (whole-process people’s democracy) na russkii yazyk [Difficulties in translating the Chinese concept 全过程人民民主 (whole-process people’s democracy) into Russian]. In 75 let KNR: obshchestvenno-politicheskie protsessy v epokhu Si Tszin’pina [75th Anniversary of the PRC: Socio-Political Processes in the Xi Jinping Era] (pp. 19-31). Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies RAS, IFES RAS. (In Russ.)

Demokratii XXI veka: smena paradigmy [Democracies of the 21st century: a paradigm shift]. (2015). Moscow: Zhukovsky Academy Publishing House. (In Russ.)

Denisov, I.E., & Zuenko, I.Yu. (2022). Ot myagkoi sily k diskursivnoi sile: novye ideologemy vneshnei politiki KNR [From soft power to discursive power: new ideologemes of the PRC foreign policy]. Moscow: MGIMO University. (In Russ.)

Egorov, K.A. (1988). Sistema organov gosudarstva [The system of state bodies]. In L.M. Gudoshnikova (Ed.), Gosudarstvennyi stroi Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki [The State System of the PRC] (pp. 150-216). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Egorov, K.A. (1998). Predstavitel’naya sistema Kitaya: istoriya i sovremennost’ [The representative system of China: history and modernity]. Moscow: Spark. (In Russ.)

Fokin, A.A. (2024). “This is not a legal requirement, but an established tradition”, or why there was only one candidate on the Soviet ballot. Historical Courier, 1, 130-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31518/2618-9100-2024-1-8

Kara-Murza, S.G. (2012). Krizisnoe obshchestvovedenie. Chast’ vtoraya. Kurs lektsii [Anticrisis social science. Part two. A course of lectures]. Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert. (In Russ.)

Karneev, A.N. (2021). Elements and channels of bottom-up feedback in contemporary China’s political system. World Economy and International Relations, 7, 56-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-7-56-63

Kondrashova, L.I. (2010). Kakaya demokratiya nuzhna Kitayu? [What kind of democracy does China need?]. In O.T. Bogomolov (Ed.), Neekonomicheskie grani ekonomiki: nepoznannoe vzaimovliyanie [Noneconomic facets of the economy: unrecognized mutual influence] (pp. 316-347). Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies. (In Russ.)

Kondrashova, L.I., & Chubarov, I.G. (2022). Administrativno-territorial’noe ustroistvo (delenie) KNR [Administrative-territorial structure (division) of the PRC]. In A.V. Vinogradov (Ed.), Sovremennoe kitaiskoe gosudarstvo [The Modern Chinese State] (pp. 19-44). Moscow: RAS. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48647/IFES.2022.88.54.004

Korolev, A.N. (2013). Kitaiskie uchenye o vozmozhnykh stsenariyakh politicheskoi reformy v KNR [Chinese scientists on possible scenarios of political reform in the PRC]. In 18-i s”ezd KPK: novye zadachi i perspektivy razvitiya [18th Congress of the CPC: new tasks and prospects of development] (pp. 22-42). Moscow: IFES RAS. (In Russ.)

Korolev, A.N. (2015). PRC’s political regime responsiveness to the population’s basic needs. Far Eastern Affairs, 2, 90-107. (In Russ.)

Lenin, V.I. (1974). Gosudarstvo i revolutsia [The state and the revolution]. Complete works. Vol. 33. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)

Li, Xu, & Wang, Jiantao. (2023). Whole process of democracy: history, theory and enlightenment. Vlast’, 3, 116-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i3.9641

Lomanov, A.V. (2023). Innovation and tradition in the interpretation of democracy in the modern CCP ideology. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 88-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.05.06

Lukin, A.V. (2009). Introduction of the concept of ‘democracy’ in China and its first interpretations. Society and State in China, 39(1), 274-295. (In Russ.)

Lukin, A.V. (2023). The concepts of sinification of Marxism, a new form of human civilization and civilization-state in modern Chinese ideological discourse. Chinese Studies in Russia, 2, 71-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48647/ICCA.2023.68.94.004

Mamaeva, N.L. (2004). Kommunisticheskaya partiya Kitaya i problema reformy politicheskoi sistemy [The Communist Party of China and the problem of political system reform]. In S.L. Tikhvinskii (Ed.), Kitai v dialoge tsivilizatsii [China in the Dialogue of Civilizations] (pp. 186-192). Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli. (In Russ.)

Melville, A.Yu. (2008). Kak izmeryat’ i sravnivat’ urovni demokraticheskogo razvitiya v raznykh stranakh? (Po materialam issledovatel’skogo proekta “Politicheskii atlas sovremennosti”) [How to measure and compare levels of democratic development in different countries? (Based on the research project “Political Atlas of Modernity”)]. Moscow: MGIMO University. (In Russ.)

Mirskii, G.I. (1996). Authoritarianism and democracy: two models? Polis. Political Studies, 6, 136-144. (In Russ.)

Portyakov, V.Ya. (2004). O problemakh sovershenstvovaniya politicheskoi sistemy Kitaya [On the problems of improving the political system of China]. In S.L. Tikhvinskii (Ed.), Kitai v dialoge tsivilizatsii [China in the Dialogue of Civilizations] (pp. 182-185). Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli. (In Russ.)

Pye, L.W. (2012). The Non-Western Political Process. (Russ. ed.: Pye, L.W. Nezapadnyi politicheskii protsess. In Kontseptsiya modernizatsii v zarubezhnoi sotsial’no-politicheskoi teorii, 1950-1960 gg. (pp. 94-114). Moscow: INION RAS).

Semenov, A.A. (2018). The role of small democratic parties in the PRC political system. Society and State in China, 1, 321-331. (In Russ.)

Smirnov, D.A. (2012). On the issue of the ideological origins of Mao Zedong’s theory of “new democracy”. Society and State in China, 42(6-1), 380-386. (In Russ.)

Stepanova, G.A. (1999). Sistema mnogopartiinogo sotrudnichestva v Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respublike [Multiparty cooperation system in the PRC]. Moscow: IFES RAS. (In Russ.)

Troshchinskii, P.V. (2022). Izbiratel’naya sistema KNR [Electoral system of the People’s Republic of China]. In A.V. Vinogradov (Ed.), Sovremennoe kitaiskoe gosudarstvo [The Modern Chinese State] (pp. 133-177). Moscow: RAS. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48647/IFES.2022.99.31.008

Vinogradov, A.V. (2022). Vvedenie [Introduction]. In A.V. Vinogradov (Ed.), Sovremennoe kitaiskoe gosudarstvo [The Modern Chinese State]. Vol. 1. (pp. 3-18). Moscow: RAS. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48647/IFES.2022.80.59.003

Vinogradov, A.V. (2024). Cycles and rhythms of democracy in the People’s Republic of China. Far Eastern Affairs, 6, 121-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0131281224060082

Volodin, A.G. (2023). Return of development: polycentric world in search of a new existential paradigm. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 93(11), 1019-1031. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587323110099

Voskresenskii, A.D. (2011). General patterns, regional specificity and the concept of non-Western democracy. Comparative Politics, 1, 44-69. (In Russ.)

Voskresenskii, A.D. (2014). Evolution of the political system and political modernization of China: problems and advantages of the “Chinese model”. Comparative Politics, 1, 120-138. (In Russ.)

Yurchak, A.V. (2014). Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos’. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [Everything was forever, until it was no more. the last Soviet generation]. Moscow: New Literary Observer. (In Russ.)

Chen, Zhouwang, & Tang, Langshi. (2023). Democratic governance under socialism: system and processes. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House. (In Chin.)

Chinese system: face to face. Current issues in theory. (2020). Beijing: Study Publishing House. (In Chin.)

Lin, Jianhua et al. (2022). Chinese whole process people’s democracy. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Publishing House. (In Chin.)

Zhang, Shuhua, & Wang, Bingquan. (2023). Theory and practice of the whole process people’s democracy. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Publishing House. (In Chin.)

Zheng, Bijian. (2023). Whole process people’s democracy. Beijing: Foreign Language Literature Publishing House. (In Chin.)

See also: