print

The impact of COVID-19 on European integration in the context of regime theory

Ivkina N.V.,

RUDN University, Moscow, Russia, ivkina-nv@rudn.ru

elibrary_id: 856747 | ORCID: 0000-0001-8654-7629 |

Article received: 2024.05.27 17:10. Accepted: 2024.12.16 17:10


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.04.05
EDN: NDBPIG

Rubric: Theme of the issue: USA and Europe – unions, regimes and coalitions in the circumstances of global transformations

For citation:

Ivkina N.V. The impact of COVID-19 on European integration in the context of regime theory. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.04.05. EDN: NDBPIG (In Russ.)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on integration processes in the European Union. The author highlights the most important cases within the framework of this problem. They allow to identify the unifying and separating factors of the common European policy in the context of the collective fight against COVID-19. The theory of international regimes is proposed as the theoretical basis of the article. The behavior of the EU during covid and the post-covid period is taken as the studied regime. Its postulates made it possible at the initial stage to track the norms, principles, and methods of combating the threat adopted at the supranational level and at the subsequent stages to analyze the effectiveness of measures and their nature. In this regard, the main objectives of the study include: an analysis of the correlation of the theory of international regimes with the structural policy of the EU in times of crisis, as well as the identification of neoliberal and neorealist trends in the behavioral model of the EU. The methodological basis of the study includes a comparative analysis, which involves the identification of three main elements of the theory of international regimes and the implementation of practical cases of the EU behavioral model within them. The results of the study are presented in the form of conclusions regarding which of the selected practical cases fall under the category of neoliberal functional theory of international regimes, and which under the neorealist. The conclusion also outlines the arguments that speak of the COVID-19 pandemic as a divisive factor in European integration. The scientific significance of the study is to expand the evidence base of the theory of political regimes by presenting the EU’s efforts to combat the pandemic as a separate regime.

Keywords

European Union, COVID-19 pandemic, European integration, international regime theory, neorealism, neoliberalism.

Вossong, B. (2020). EU border security in a time of pandemic. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2020C28_Schengen.pdf

Claeys, R., & Wolf, G.B. (2020). Fiscal response: what are the options for the EU Council? Bruegel. https://www.bruegel.org/2020/03/esm-credit-lines-corona-bonds-euro-area-treasury-one-off-joint-expenditures-what-are-the-options-for-the-eu-council/

Fontana, O. (2022). Italian Euroscepticism and the COVID-19 pandemic: survey insights. Instituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/italian-euroscepticism-and-covid-19-pandemic-survey-insights

Haas, E. (1961). International integration: The European and the universal process. International Organization, 15(3), 366-392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300002198

Krasner, S.D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables, in international regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920

Meiches, B., & Hopkins, R. (2018). Regime theory. International Studies Encyclopedia. http://internationalstudies.oxfordre.com/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrfore-9780190846626-e-472?rskey=Pfywi5&result=9

Moravcsik, A. (2012). Liberal theories of international. In J.L. Dunoff, & M.A. Pollack (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (pp. 84-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moravcsik, A. (2018). Preferences, power and institutions in 21st-century Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(7), 1648-1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12804

Viotti, P.R., & Kauppi, M.V. (2012). International relations theory. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Ivkina, N.V. (2021). Germany’s position on the Greek-Turkish dispute: intergovernmental theory vs. neofunctionalism. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 21(2), 478-497. (In Russ.)

Lunkin, R.N. (2021). Fears and hopes of the Europeans in the context of pandemic. Moscow: Institute of Europe Publ. (In Russ.)

Maslova, E.A. (2020). Italian coronacrisis and its repercussions: national, European, and global dimensions. Journal of International Analytics, 11(1), 58-70. (In Russ.)

Milovidov, V.D. (2020). Pandemic in the network society: COVID-19 in EU and Latin America. Contemporary Europe, 1, 130-140. (In Russ.)

Timofeev, P.P., & Khorolskaya, M.V. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic as a challenge to Franco-German leadership in the EU. World Economy and International Relations, 65(8), 72-80. (In Russ.)

See also: