Post-conflict democratization, foreign funding, and NGO-ization of civil society in Somalia

Post-conflict democratization, foreign funding, and NGO-ization of civil society in Somalia


Marian A.M.,

Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia; Simad University, Mogadishu, Somalia, marianbarow@gmail.com

ORCID: 0009-0008-1043-7907 |

Farouk A.F.A.,

Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, azeemf@usm.my

Khelghat-Doost H.,

University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom, hkelghatdoost@lincoln.ac.uk

Jaafar F. ,

Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, faridahjaafar@usm.my


Article received: 2024.01.08 20:08. Accepted: 2024.11.22 20:09


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2025.04.06
EDN: DWAHKW


For citation:

Marian A.M., Farouk A.F.A., Khelghat-Doost H., Jaafar F. Post-conflict democratization, foreign funding, and NGO-ization of civil society in Somalia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2025. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.04.06. EDN: DWAHKW



Abstract

 Civil society in post-conflict states like Somalia is of immense importance to democratization. However, the proliferation of NGOs and foreign aid have resulted in dependency, potentially undermining local agencies and sustainable governance. The present research explores the critical association between foreign funding, NGO-ization, and democratization in Somalia by focusing on Mogadishu. Through the implementation of a qualitative case study approach, the data was collected through in-depth interviews with the staff of local civil society organizations and direct observations. The findings reveal that donordriven NGOs usually prioritize accountability to donors over local needs. This results in short-term projects with a limited long-term influence. However, this NGO-ization model has weakened the indigenous initiatives and impact of civil society on state-building efforts. The present research holds immense theoretical and practical implications. The study underscores the limitations of NGO-ization models in developing civil society. It highlights the importance of integrating local contextual factors within the theoretical frameworks for democratization. This study provides valuable insights to the donors and policymakers, highlighting that they should prioritize funding models that enhance the long-term sustainability of civil society initiatives. Research limitations and future indications are also discussed in the last section.

Keywords
post-conflict democratization, foreign funding, NGO-ization, civil society, Somalia.


References

AbouAssi, K. (2013). Hands in the pockets of mercurial donors: NGO response to shifting funding priorities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 584-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012439629

Ahmed, A.A., & Özoral, L.B. (2020). The role of civil society in peace building in Somalia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4(11), 295-302.

Aid flows in Somalia. (2019). Federal government of Somalia. https://somalia.un.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/Aid%20Flows%20in%20Somalia%20-%202019%20ENGLISH.pdf

Altare, C., & Guha-Sapir, D. (2014). The Complex Emergency Database: a global repository of small-scale surveys on nutrition, health and mortality. PLoS One, 9(10), e109022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0109022

Ana, A. (2019). The NGO-ization of social movements in neoliberal times: contemporary feminisms in Romania and Belgium.

Ayhan, E. (2020). Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in Turkey: History, Theories and Issues. Ankara: Iksad Publications.

Barrow, I.H. (2019). Internal security crisis in Somalia: lesson from the civil war in 1990. Asian Journal Of Management Sciences & Education, 8(3), 88-96.

Blühdorn, I., & Butzlaff, F. (2020). Democratization beyond the post-democratic turn: towards a research agenda on new conceptions of citizen participation. Democratization, 27(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1707808

Brass, J.N. (2022). Do service provision NGOs perform civil society functions? Evidence of NGOs’ relationship with democratic participation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(1), 148-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764021991671

Campbell, P., & Jankowitz, S. (2024). Funding art in post-conflict society: a ‘peace dividend’? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 30(7), 848-863. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2024.2304297

Chahim, D., & Prakash, A. (2014). NGOization, foreign funding, and the Nicaraguan civil society. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 487-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9348-z

Dini, S., & Farah, A.O. (2014). Transitional civil society, Insecurity and Volatile Environment. Transnational NGOs: Creative Connections of Development and Global Governance, 130.

Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004269430

Engels, B. (2023). Coups and neo-colonialism. Review of African Political Economy, 50(176), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2023.2269693

Englehart, N.A. (2011). What makes civil society civil? The state and social groups. Polity, 43(3), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2010.25

Eswarappa, K. (2020). Community-based organizations (CBOs) and their role in the development of women: a case from Andhra Pradesh. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 13(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X20922437

Gianni, N., Michele, F., & Lozza, C. (2021). NGO-ization. Challenging Power: Gender and Social Justice in the Middle East, 46.

Hammond, L., & Vaughan-Lee, H. (2012). Humanitarian space in Somalia: a scarce commodity. HPG Working Paper. London: Overseas Development Institute.

Harvey, P. (1998). Rehabilitation in complex political emergencies: is rebuilding civil society the answer? Disasters, 22(3), 200-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00087

Hassan, M. (2023). The nature of civil conflict and the rise of islamic militancy in Somalia. Studia Politica Slovaca, XVI(2), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.31577/SPS.2023-2.3

Isaacs, A. (2013). International assistance for democracy: a cautionary tale. In The Future of Inter-American Relations (pp. 259-286). Routledge.

Ishida, Y. (2023). Civil society organizations. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1709-1718). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_153

Kilby, P. (2006). Accountability for empowerment: dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. World Development, 34(6), 951-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.009

Le Sage, A., & Majid, N. (2002). The livelihoods gap: responding to the economic dynamics of vulnerability in Somalia. Disasters, 26(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00188

Levy, D.A. (2022). Recommendation to institute soft power-building foreign economic support mechanisms as cornerstones of US foreign assistance funding. Johns Hopkins University.

Malik, N., & Rana, A. (2020). Civil society in Pakistan: an exclusive discourse of projectization. Dialectical Anthropology, 44(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-020-09581-7

Mehta, V. (2001). Book review: towards financial self-reliance: a handbook on resource mobilization for civil society organisations in the South by Richard Holloway. Earthscan Publications, London, and Sterling, VA, 2001. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(424-426). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013935018831

Menkhaus, K. (2010). Stabilisation and humanitarian access in a collapsed state: the Somali case. Disasters, 34(3), S320-S341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01204.x

Menkhaus, K., Sheikh, H., Quinn, S., & Farah, I. (2010). Somalia: Civil society in a collapsed state. In Paffenholz, T. (Ed.), Civil Society and Peacebuilding: a Critical Assessment (pp. 321-350). Boulder: Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685856878-015

Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: a critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993402ps027ra

Mohan, M., Rue, H.A., Bajaj, S., Galgamuwa, G.P., Adrah, E., Aghai, M.M., Broadbent, E.N., Khadamkar, O., Sasmito, S.D., Roise, J., Doaemo, W., & Cardil. A. (2021). Afforestation, reforestation and new challenges from COVID-19: Thirty-three recommendations to support Civil Society Organizations (CSOs). Journal of Environmental Management, 287, 112277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112277

Pouligny, B. (2005). Civil society and post-conflict peacebuilding: ambiguities of international programmes aimed at building ‘new’ societies. Security Dialogue, 36(4), 495-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010605060448

Sabatini, C.A. (2002). Whom do international donors support in the name of civil society? Development in Practice, 12(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520220104248

Saggiomo, V. (2013). Models of aid to Somalia. Journal of Internal Displacement, 3(2), 23-41.

Sisaye, S. (2021). The influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the development of voluntary sustainability accounting reporting rules. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 1(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-02-2021-0017

Skaaning, S.-E. (2020). Waves of autocratization and democratization: a critical note on conceptualization and measurement. Democratization, 27(8), 1533-1542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1799194

Spurk, C. (2008). Understanding civil society. In T. Paffenholz (Ed.), Civil Society and Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment (pp. 3-27). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Strengthening civil society in Somalia: developing a comprehensive strategy. (2012). The EU Somalia Unit and DfID. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/20130612_cs_strategy.pdf

Suárez, D., & Gugerty, M.K. (2016). Funding civil society? Bilateral government support for development NGOs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27, 2617-2640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9706-3

Tsitrinbaum, Y. (2012). Aid partnerships: a vehicle to strengthen NGOs in Somalia? The NGOs humanitarian reform project, phase II. Nairobi: InterAction.

Van Leeuwen, M., & Verkoren, W. (2012). Complexities and challenges for civil society building in post-conflict settings. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 7(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2012.719353

Verkoren, W., & Van Leeuwen, M. (2013). Civil society in peacebuilding: global discourse, local reality. International Peacekeeping, 20(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2013.791560

Zhao, J., Madni, G.R., Anwar, M.A., & Zahra, S.M. (2021). Institutional reforms and their impact on economic growth and investment in developing countries. Sustainability, 13(9), 4941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13094941

 

Content No. 4, 2025
 Гражданское общество в постконфликтных государствах, таких как Сомали, решающим образом влияет на процесс демократизации. Вместе с тем распространение НПО и иностранной помощи создает зависимость, потенциально подрывающую устойчивость управления, осуществляемого местными органами власти. В настоящей статье изучается критическая связь между иностранным финансированием, НПОизацией и демократизацией в Сомали. Благодаря использованию методов включенного наблюдения, а также качественных кейс-стади были проведены углубленные интервью с сотрудниками местных организаций гражданского общества в Могадишо, полученный эмпирический материал обобщен и проанализирован. Анализ материалов интервью позволил выявить противоречия в функционировании структур, ориентированных на получение зарубежного финансирования. Было показано, что для НПО, управляемых донорами, как правило, подотчетность донорам имеет приоритет над локальными потребностями. В результате реализуются краткосрочные проекты с ограниченным эффектом в долгосрочной перспективе. Такая модель НПОизации ослабила местные инициативы и воздействие гражданского общества на процесс государственного строительства. Теоретическая значимость работы заключается в критическом переосмыслении роли НПО в теориях демократизации и выявлении ограничений модели НПОизации в развитии гражданского общества. В работе аргументируется важность интеграции местных контекстуальных факторов в теоретические рамки демократизации. Практическая ценность исследования выражена в рекомендациях, в которых акцентируется приоритетность моделей финансирования, повышающих долгосрочную устойчивость инициатив местных организаций гражданского общества, и которые адресованы донорам НПО и политикам, работающим с ними. Обозначены ограничения исследовательского подхода и перспективные направления для дальнейших исследований.

&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=75&rft.tpage=61-75&rft.number=&rft.year=2025&rft.issn=0321-2017&rft.shorttitle=&rft.subject=постконфликтная демократизация, иностранное финансирование, НПОизация, гражданское общество, Сомали&rft.pub=&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fwww.politstudies.ru%3A&rft.date=2025&rft.au=Marian A.M.&rft.au=Farouk A.F.A.&rft.au=Khelghat-Doost H.&rft.au=Jaafar F.">

See also:


Lane D.,
Civil society in the countries of the European Union: ideology, institutions and advance of democracy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No2

Vasilchuk Yu.A.,
Civil Society of the Epoch of Scientific and Technological Revolution. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No4

Shapiro Ien,
Democracy and Civil Society. – Polis. Political Studies. 1992. No4

Levin I.B.,
Civil Society in the West and in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No5

Peregudov S.P.,
Civil Society: a Tri-Nomic or a Mono-Nomic Model?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No3

 
 

Archive

   2025      2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991