print

The notion of connectivity in EU foreign policy discourse and practice

Bolgova I.V.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, i.bolgova@inno.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 202193 | ORCID: 0000-0001-6992-3792 |

Melnikova Yu.Yu.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, jmelnikova@russiancouncil.ru

elibrary_id: 1155055 | ORCID: 0000-0001-7922-2498 |

Article received: 2025.04.08 19:47. Accepted: 2025.11.05 19:47


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2026.01.10
EDN: CCGACB

Rubric: Orbis terrarum

For citation:

Bolgova I.V., Melnikova Yu.Yu. The notion of connectivity in EU foreign policy discourse and practice. – Polis. Political Studies. 2026. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2026.01.10. EDN: CCGACB (In Russ.)

The study was carried out with financial support under the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-4810015 “Transformation of military-political, energy and socio-humanitarian aspects of the European security system: significance for the Union State” (jointly with the BFFR).

Abstract

Since the mid-2010s, the concept of connectivity has gained traction in international studies, having secured a significant place for itself in the debate around structural factors of leadership. This growing academic engagement with the topic has been rising partially due to active integration of the term into the foreign policy discourse of the European Union and its interpretation as a competition instrument for the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative, aimed at strengthening the EU presence in the neighboring regions. However, existing research remains confined to the current phase of the EU policy, preventing the scholars from tracking down the evolution of the European connectivity policy, identifying similarities and differences between periods and, therefore, from accessing the depth of the EU foreign policy toolkit transformation. The article presents the diachronic analysis of EU transport, logistics and infrastructural policies. Through a comparative assessment of the official documents and the accompanying discourse in the 1990-2000s and the 2010-2020s provides for identifying main objectives of the EU external connectivity practices and, mainly, the key features of the current international infrastructural Global Gateway initiative. The authors conclude that it would be incorrect to interpret the EU’s connectivity policy as a fundamentally innovative instrument of influence projection for the European Union. On the contrary, the research demonstrates that the core instruments of EU engagement with partners in the infrastructural domain were initially established to enhance internal connectivity and support enlargement by promoting European norms and standards, upholding the EU energy security and exploring new transit opportunities.
The active integration of the connectivity concept into the EU’s foreign policy discourse in the late 2010s is, in its turn, part of a self-reflection process on the nature of the EU actorness and is driven by its agenda-setting ambition.

Keywords

regionalism, connectivity, EU foreign policy, Global Gateway, TEN-T, transport corridors.

Barthel, M. (2017). Connectivity vs. disconnectivity – the influence of EU border policies on regions. A case study of Poland’s Western and Eastern borders. Cross-border Review, 97-109. https://budapest.cescinet.eu/en/cross-border-review-2017/

Becker, W., Domínguez-Torreiro, M., Neves, A.R., Moura, C.T., & Saisana, M. (2021). Exploring the link between Asia and Europe connectivity and sustainable development. Research in Globalization, 3(6), 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100045

Gaens, B., Sinkkonen, V., & Vogt, H. (2023) Connectivity and order: an analytical framework. East Asia, 40, 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-023-09401-z

Herman, L., & Ariel, J. (2024). Comparative energy regionalism: North America and the European energy community. Review of Policy Research, 41(2), 382-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12421

Karjalainen, T. (2023). European norms trap? EU connectivity policies and the case of the global gateway. East Asia, 40(2), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-023-09403-x

Kaššaj, M., & Perácek, T. (2024). Sustainable connectivity–integration of mobile roaming, WiFi4EU and smart city concept in the European Union. Sustainability, 16(2), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020788

Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography: mapping the future of global civilization. Random House.

Leonard, M. (ed.) (2016). Connectivity wars: why migration, finance and trade are the geo-economic battlegrounds of the future. London: European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/ uploads/Connectivity_Wars.pdf

Okano-Heijmans, M. (2020). The EU’s value proposition for connectivity: time to choose and focus. In Responding to the Geopolitics of Connectivity: Asian and European Perspectives (pp. 11-21). Konrad-AdenauerStiftung.

Okano-Heijmans, M. (2024). The EU’s connectivity strategy 2.0: Global Gateway in the Indo-Pacific. In The Transformation of the Liberal International Order: Evolutions and Limitations (pp. 23-54). Tokyo: The International House of Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4729-4_4

Opitz, S., & Tellmann, U. (2015). Europe as infrastructure: networking the operative community. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831356-

Schipper F., & Schot, J. (2011). Infrastructural Europeanism, or the project of building Europe on infrastructures: an introduction. History and Technology, 27(3), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2011.604166

Simurdić, M. (2009). The energy community–EU energy enlargement? International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, 18(3), 49-68.

Sommerer, T., & Tallberg, J. (2019). Diffusion across international organizations: connectivity and convergence. International Organization, 73(2), 399-433.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818318000450

Stanivuković, N.S. (2023). Roads of Europe–on infrastructural time, near, distant, and past futures. Global Society, 37(4), 506-526.https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2187764

Bisson, L.S. (2024). EU-Africa: interim results of the Global Gateway Initiative investment projects. European Union: Facts and Comments, 118, 65-68 (In Russ.)

See also: