The Russian Metaverse: sociocultural topology and morphology of the new space

The Russian Metaverse:
sociocultural topology and morphology of the new space


Kryshtanovskaya O.V.,

Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, olgakrysht@yandex.ru


elibrary_id: 357811 | ORCID: 0000-0001-5278-0940 |

Lavrov I.A. ,

Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, lavrov.sociology@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 1053266 | ORCID: 0000-0002-3567-4502 |

Article received: 2025.07.21 19:41. Accepted: 2026.01.11 19:41


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2026.02.06
EDN: NFEFUF


For citation:

Kryshtanovskaya O.V., Lavrov I.A. The Russian Metaverse: sociocultural topology and morphology of the new space. – Polis. Political Studies. 2026. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2026.02.06. EDN: NFEFUF (In Russ.)



Abstract

This article attempts to understand the phenomenon of the Russian Metaverse – a multifaceted digital space shaped by global digitalization trends and the country’s unique sociocultural characteristics. Drawing on the theoretical approaches of M. Castells, Z. Bauman, J. Urry and M. Ball, we explore the ontological foundations, social topology, and the specific borders and inhabitants of this virtual entity. The article seeks to demonstrate that the space known as the Russian Metaverse cannot be reduced to the physical, linguistic or administrative borders of the Russian Federation. It is a global digital space with blurred contours, defined not by territorial affiliation but by the complex interaction of cultural identity, shared interests and online practices of millions of users. The article analyzes the key characteristics of the Russian Metaverse, including its “fluidity,” hypermobility, hyperconnectivity and the hybridization of offline and online realities. Particular attention is paid to the role of digital platforms, which act as the infrastructural core of Russia’s virtual world and to the principles of digital stratification, manifested through the activities of avatars and the communities that emerge around them. The paradoxical combination of global permeability and digital localization, manifested in the phenomenon of “network bubbles” is explored. We identify a fundamental tension between the hierarchical logic of the traditional state and the networked principles of social structure, which gives rise to new challenges. The state’s adaptation to the new reality, including the creation of a “smart state” and the development of its own digital products, is examined as a response to these challenges. The conclusion emphasizes that the Russian Metaverse represents not only an object of scientific research but also an arena for future social, political, and cultural transformations.

Keywords
metaverse, Russia, digital space, Russian world, digital stratification, platformization, network capital, fluidity, superconnectivity, Runet, digital state, avatar.


References

Beck, U. (2016). The metamorphosis of the world: how climate change is transforming our concept of the world. Cambridge: Polity.

Casilli, A., & Posada, J. (2019). The platformization of labor and society. In Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication Are Changing Our Lives (pp. 293-306). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843498.003.0018

Chayko, M. (2016). Superconnected: the Internet, digital media, and techno-social life. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Fang, Z. (2002). E-government in the digital era: concept, practice, and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10(2), 1-22.

Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2012). Towards a smart state? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond. Information Polity, 17(3-4), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-000287

GovTech maturity index, 2022 update: trends in public sector digital transformation. (2022). Washington: World Bank.

Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Hoe, S.L. (2016). Defining a smart nation: the case of Singapore. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 14(4), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2016-0005

Kaufmann, V. (2000). Re-thinking mobility. Contemporary sociology. London: Routledge.

Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x

Noveck, B.S. (2015). Smart citizens, smarter state: the technologies of expertise and the future of governing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674915435

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164

Silcock, R. (2001). What is e-government? Parliamentary Affairs, 54(1), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/54.1.88

Steinberg, M. (2019). The platform economy. How Japan transformed the consumer Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctvc2rn88

Van Dijck, J. (2021). Seeing the forest for the trees: visualizing platformization and its governance. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2801-2819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820940293

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The network society. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739114

Ageichev, A.S. (2016). Internet legislation: Russian and international experience. Comparative Politics, 7(2), 73-84. (In Russ.)

Astakhov, E.M., & Astakhova, E.V. (2011). Russia and the “Russian world”. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 1, 316-322. (In Russ.)

Ball, M. (2023). The metaverse: and how it will revolutionize everything. (Russ. ed.: Ball, M. Metavselennaya. Kak ona menyaet nash mir. Moscow: Alpina Publisher).

Batanova, O.N. (2009). Russkii mir i problemy ego formirovaniya [The Russian world and the problems of its formation]. PhD thesis. Moscow: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. (In Russ.)

Bauman, Z. (2002). The Individualized Society. (Russ. ed: Bauman, Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. Moscow: Logos).

Bauman, Z. (2008). Liquid modernity. (Russ. ed.: Bauman, Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost’. Moscow: Piter).

Bauman, Z., & Donskis, L. (2019). Liquid evil: living with TINA. (Russ. ed.: Bauman, Z., & Donskis, L. Tekuchee zlo: zhizn’ v mire, gde net al’ternativ. St. Petersburg: Ivan Limbakh Publishing House).

Castells, M. (2017). Communication power. (Russ. ed.: Castells, M. Vlast’ kommunikatsii. Moscow: HSE Publishing House). https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-1556-3

Chernogor, N.N., Pashentsev, D.A., Zaloilo, M.V., Dorskaya, A.A., Emel’yanov, A.S., Ivanyuk, O.A., Israelyan, V.B., & Abdieva, D.A. (2021). Kontseptsiya tsifrovogo gosudarstva i tsifrovoi pravovoi sredy [Concept of digital state and digital legal environment]. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/1288140

Giddens, A. (2005). The constitution of society. (Russ. ed.: Giddens, A. Ustroenie obshchestva. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt).

Gronskii, A.D. (2017). The Russian world in search of content. Russia in Global Affairs, 15(4), 186-201. (In Russ.)

Heimans, D., & Timms, H. (2018). New power: how power works in our hyperconnected world. (Russ. ed.: Heimans, D., & Timms, H. Novaya vlast’. Kakie sily upravlyayut mirom i kak zastavit’ ikh rabotat’ na vas. Moscow: Alpina Digital).

Irkhin, Yu. (2008). “E-government”: Theory and Practice. Public Administration, 4, 162-173. (In Russ.)

Jackson, M.O. (2021). The human network: how your social position determines your power, beliefs, and behaviors. (Russ. ed.: Jackson, M.O. Chelovecheskie seti. Kak sotsial’noe polozhenie vliyaet na nashi vozmozhnosti, vzglyady i povedenie. Moscow: IST).

Kocherov, S.N. (2014). The Russian world: the problem of determination. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 5-1, 163-167. (In Russ.)

Kot, Yu.V., & Kudrina, E.L. (2024). The variety of interpretations of the concept of the “Russian world”. The Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts (Vestnik MGUKI), 1, 15-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1997-0803-2024-1117-15-20

Kryshtanovskaya, O.V., & Lavrov, I.A. (2024). Tsifrovaya intelligentsiya i ee vliyanie v sotsial’nykh setyakh [Digital intelligentsia and its influence on social networks]. In Obshchestvennyi dogovor: formy uchastiya intelligentsii v ego realizatsii v Rossii [The Social Contract: Forms of Intelligentsia Participation in Its Implementation in Russia] (pp. 96-110). Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. (In Russ.)

Nazarova, G.F., & Fokina, A.V. (2015). Russian world: the renewal of approaches to the conception. Scientific Notes of Orel State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 6, 338-343. (In Russ.)

Neimark, M.A. (2015). Russian world and geopolitics. Post-Soviet Issues, 2, 78-100. (In Russ.)

Panchenko, V.Yu., & Romashov, R.A. (2018). Digital state as a conceptual foundation of the global world order. State and Law, 7, 99-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013207690000235-0

Pavlyutenkova, M.Yu. (2013). E-government in Russia: current state and prospects. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 86-99. (In Russ.)

Petukhov, V.V., & Barash, R.E. (2014). The Russians and the “Russian world”: the historical context and the contemporary interpretation. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 83-101. (In Russ.)

Skvortsov, N.G., Vereshchagina, A.V., & Samygin, S.I. (2016). The “Russian world” in the sociological discourse on civilizational security and national identity in Russia. Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences, 6-7, 103-107. (In Russ.)

Timofeev, S.E. (2018). Ideologeme the “slavic community” in the modern political discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 9(1), 186-199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-186-199

Tishkov, V.A. (2007). The Russian world: meanings and strategies. Strategy of Russia, 7, 5-15. (In Russ.)

Urry, J. (2012). Mobilities. (Russ. ed.: Urry, J. Mobil’nosti. Moscow: Praxis).

Urry, J. (2019). What is the future? (Russ. ed.: Urry, J. Kak vyglyadit budushchee? Moscow: Delo).

Zolaev, E.A. (2021). Digital state as a new stage of social development. Creative Economy, 15(5), 1583-1594. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.15.5.112164

Content No. 2, 2026

See also:


Bykov I.A., Hall T.E.,
Digital divide and the Internet-users political preferences in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Timofeyeva L.N., Ryabchenko N.A., Malysheva O.P., Gnedash A.A.,
The digital socio-political agenda and its conceptualization within the new media ecology framework. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No2

Kochetkov A.P., Mamychev A.Yu.,
Russian public policy in the digital age: trends, scenarios and regulatory practices. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No1

Timofeyeva L.N., Ryabchenko N.A., Malysheva O.P., Gnedash A.A.,
The digital socio-political agenda: theoretical model tested on the Russian case “Coronavirus-2020”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No5

Radina N.K.,
Digital Political Mobilization of Online Commenters on Publications about Politics and International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No2

 
 

Archive

   2026   
   2025      2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991