Digital political communication of new-generation right-wing populists in the EU:
a comparative analysis
Boldyrev, M.O.,
MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, markb@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-9658-8341 | RESEARCHER_ID: PQV-7841-2026Article received: 2025.09.11 12:39. Accepted: 2026.03.01 12:39

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2026.03.04
EDN: CRYUPF
Boldyrev, M.O. Digital political communication of new-generation right-wing populists in the EU: a comparative analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2026. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2026.03.04. EDN: CRYUPF (In Russ.)
The article examines the digital political communication of a new generation of right-wing populist leaders in the European Union. The aim of the study is to identify the mechanisms through which systematic digital communication transforms into a stable digital reputation and becomes a significant resource for political mobilisation. The working hypothesis suggests that regular and personalised communication by right-wing populist leaders on digital platforms contributes to strengthening their public image, shaping a resilient digital reputation, and increasing their appeal among younger audiences. The study draws on contemporary approaches to populism as a style of political mobilisation, as well as on concepts of digital political communication, political personalisation, and the mediatisation of the public sphere. Digital reputation is conceptualised as the outcome of discursive, visual, and communicative practices formed in the online environment under the influence of the algorithmic logic of platforms. The methodological framework is based on a qualitative approach, including case studies, comparative analysis, and elements of digital discourse analysis. The empirical basis consists of three cases of young right-wing populist leaders: Jordan Bardella (France), Tom Van Grieken (Belgium), and Rita Matias (Portugal). The analysis focuses on the choice of digital platforms, communication styles and formats, dominant narratives, modes of leader representation, and mobilisation effects. The findings demonstrate that social media function as the central channel of political communication for right-wing populists, enabling a high degree of personalisation, emotionalisation, and direct interaction with audiences. Despite differences in national contexts, digital strategies exhibit similar discursive elements, most notably the reproduction of the populist dichotomy between “the people” and “the elite”. The identified differences point to the variability of models of digital reputation formation, ranging from personalised leadership to symbolic reputational positioning. The article concludes that digital reputation constitutes an important factor in political mobilisation and in the transformation of party leadership under conditions of digitalisation.
References
Batista, F. (2024). Culture war: exploring the backing from the Portuguese Catholic Church and Christian movements to populist party Chega. Religions, 15(12), 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121436
Bazhenova, E.A., & Shirinkina, M.A. (2024). Digital reputation of the executive power bodies: discursive factors and communicative techniques of management. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 23(5), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.5.11
Caiani, M., & Císař, O. (2019). Radical right movement parties in Europe. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315123851
Capati, A. (2019). The personalisation of politics in the age of social media: what risks for European democracy? IAI Commentaries, 19(51). https://www.iai.it/en/publications/c05/personalisation-politics-age-social-media-what-risks-european-democracy
Cretney, L. (2025). Diaspora mobilization: the social media and internet transformation. New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy. https://newlinesinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/20250922-Digital-Diaspora-NLISAP.pdf
Heft, A., Reinhardt, S., & Pfetsch, B. (2023). Mobilization and support structures in radical right party networks: digital political communication ecologies in the 2019 European Parliament elections. Information, Communication & Society, 26(15), 2961-2981. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2129269
Jungherr, A., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). Retooling politics: how digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108297820
Mudde, C. (2019). The far right today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Paatelainen, L., Kannasto, E., & Isotalus, P. (2023). Personalized politics in traditional and social media: the case of the 2019 Finnish parliamentary elections. Mediatization Studies, 7, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.17951/ms.2023.7.31-48
Papathanassopoulos, S., & Giannouli, I. (2025). Political communication in the age of platforms. Encyclopedia, 5(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020077
Taguieff, P.-A. (1997). Le populisme et la science politique: du mirage conceptuel aux vrais problèmes. Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire, 56, 4-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3770596
Taguieff, P.-A. (2012). Le nouveau national-populisme. Paris: CNRS Éditions. https://doi.org/10.3917/cnrs.tagui.2012.01
Krasikov, V.I., Kudashov, V.I. (2023). How social networking algorithms and psychosocial vulnerabilities shape participants in radical online communities. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 16(12), 2208-2215. (In Russ.)
See also:
Timofeyeva L.N.,
Political communicativistics: problems of the formation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5
Solovey V.D.,
Digital Mythology and Donald Trump Electoral Campaign. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No5
Bezvikonnaya Ye.V.,
Systemico-Synergetic Model of a Political System. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3
Radina N.K.,
Digital Political Mobilization of Online Commenters on Publications about Politics and International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No2
Yankovskaya G.A.,
STRUGGLE FOR IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF COMMUNICATIONS. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No4

.jpg)






print.jpg)
.jpg)