print

BRICS development:
multicentricity, network structure and expansion

Lebedeva M.M.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, mmlebedeva@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 250953 | ORCID: 0000-0003-4162-0807 | RESEARCHER_ID: C-2309-2013

Kuznetsov D.A.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, kuznetsov.d.a@my.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 844183 | ORCID: 0000-0001-6265-2774 | RESEARCHER_ID: V-2802-2018

Article received: 2026.03.24 19:36. Accepted: 2026.05.04 19:36


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2026.04.02
EDN: UPWUKE

Rubric: Theme of the issue: new development drivers – BRICS and strategic communications in global policy

For citation:

Lebedeva M.M., Kuznetsov D.A. BRICS development: multicentricity, network structure and expansion. – Polis. Political Studies. 2026. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2026.04.02. EDN: UPWUKE (In Russ.)

The study was supported by grant No. 25-28-00822 from the Russian Science Foundation, https://rscf.ru/project/25-28-00822.

Abstract

The article discusses the organizational evolution of the BRICS association in the context of a fundamental transformation of global political organization. The authors proceed from the premise that contemporary global politics is increasingly moving away from a purely hierarchical model toward a more complex, multicentric structure, in which network interactions between states, non-state actors, and their associations are beginning to play a key role. Within this approach, BRICS is viewed not simply as an economic association, but as a unique network structure whose flexibility and multilayered nature allow it to successfully adapt to new global trends. The main research focus of the work is on identifying the specific features of BRICS’s organizational ties as an association of states from the Global South and on analyzing the impact of its large-scale expansion in 2024-2025 on these ties. The authors demonstrate that, unlike formal international organizations with a rigid hierarchy (e.g., NATO) and even other club formats (G7, G20), BRICS builds interactions based on the principle of a complex network. This network encompasses not only the intergovernmental level (summits and ministerial meetings), but also a diversified grassroots infrastructure: over a hundred working groups, business and expert councils, university networks, and a rapidly developing partnership between cities and municipalities. This density of the network, according to the authors, ensures the stability of the association even during periods of weakening political coordination at the highest level. The article devotes particular attention to the dual nature of BRICS expansion. On the one hand, the transformation of the “old five” into the “big ten” (with the addition of Egypt, Iran, the UAE, Ethiopia, and Indonesia) enhances the global legitimacy, representativeness, and economic weight of the association, strengthening its position as a center of a multicentric world. On the other hand, the authors identify a range of internal challenges associated with the increasing complexity of network structures: more cumbersome and slower decision-making, competition for leadership between “old” and “new” members, the expansion and potential overload of the agenda with national and regional priorities, and the risk of new nodes and interest groups forming within the network. The article contributes to the study of the transformation of global political organization and offers a framework for understanding the role of informal network structures in contemporary world politics.

Keywords

BRICS, networking, multicentricity, global politics, transregionalism, BRICS expansion, global political organization.

Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: the advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics and International Affairs, 31(3), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941700020X

Archer, C. (1983). International organizations. London: Allen & Unwin.

Arts, B., Noortmann, M., & Reinalda, B. (Eds.). (2001). Non-state actors in international relations. Aldershot; Burlington; Singapore: Ashgate Publishing.

Börzel, T.A. (1997). What’s so special about policy networks? An exploration of the concept and its usefulness in studying European governance. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 1(16), 1-24. https://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/1997-016.pdf

Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

Haas, R. (2017). A World in Disarray: American foreign policy and the crisis of the old order. New York: Penguin Press.

Hafner-Burton, E.M., Kahler, M., & Montgomery, A.H. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International Organization, 63(3), 559-592. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309090195

Hajnal, P.I. (1999). The G7/G8 system: evolution, role and documentation. London; New York: Routledge.

Hajnal, P.I. (2019). The G20: evolution, interrelationships, documentation. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351266802

Harrison, P., & Yang, Y. (2016). BRICS cities: facts & analysis 2016. Johannesburg: South African Cities Network and University of the Witwatersrand. https://www.sacities.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BRICS-Cities-Facts-and-Analysis-2016-min-1.pdf

Hettne, B., & Soderbaum, F. (1998). The new regionalism approach. Politeia, 17(3), 6-21.

Helmy, D. (2025). Egypt’s relations with BRICS: one year after joining the group – future perspectives. Cairo: IDSC Policy Perspective.

Hong, J., Heikkinen, J., & Blomqvist, K. (2010). Culture and knowledge co-creation in R&D collaboration between MNCs and Chinese universities. Knowledge and Process Management, The Journal of Corporate Transformation, 17, 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.342

Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Mustapha, A.B. (2026). Iran’s strategic gambit in the transformation of the global order: the case of BRICS membership. Iranian Studies, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/irn.2025.10139

Roger, Ch.B. (2020). The origins of informality: why the legal foundations of global governance are shifting, and why it matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rosenau, J.N. (1990). Turbulence in world politics. A theory of change and continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv301hg5

Sikkink, K. (2011). The power of networks in international politics. In M. Kahler (Ed.), Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance (pp. 228-247). Ithaca; New York: Cornell University Press. https:// doi.org/10.7591/9780801458880-013

Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Stuenkel, O. (2020). The BRICS and the future of global order. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Voskressenski, A.D. (2017). Non-Western theories of international relations: conceptualizing world-regional studies. Shpringer Global (Europe-America); Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33738-8

Yuyun, Li. (2018). Development of cooperation in higher education in BRICS countries. Changing Societies & Personalities, 2(4), 393-405. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2018.2.4.053

Arteev, S.P. (2021). Foreign policy of Russia: “soft power” of the regions. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 13(1), 32-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2021-13-1-32-57

Baranovsky, V.G. (2025). On the formation of a new world order. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 7-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2025.01.02

Fenenko, A. (2023). International Order as a category of international studies: theoretical foundations. International Trends, 21(1), 6-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.1.72.8

Konkin, A.A. (2016). Transregional partnership of BRICS in Russian studies. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 3, 123-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-3-48-123-133

Kortunov, A.V. (2026). Long-term scenarios for the development of the international system (“winter freeze” and “spring thaw”). Polis. Political Studies, 1, 72-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2026.01.06

Kuznetsov, D.A. (2020). Network texture of world politics: transregionalism of BRICS. World Economy and International Relations, 64(11), 124-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-124-131

Kuznetsov, D.A. (2022). Teoriya i praktika mezhdunarodnogo transregionalizma [Theory and practice of international transregionalism]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsov, D.A. (2024). Setevoye vzaimodeystviye BRIKS kak model’ politsentrichnosti [BRICS network interaction as a model of polycentricity]. In Rossiya v politsentrichnom mirovom poryadke: vyzovy i novyye paradigmy razvitiya. Materialy Х Vserossiyskogo kongressa politologov RAPN s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem [Russia in a Polycentric World Order: Challenges and New Development Paradigms. Proceedings of the 10th All-Russian Congress of Political Scientists of the RAPS with International Participation] (pp. 347-348). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Larionova, M.V. (2016). Assessing summit engagament with other international organizations in global governance. International Organisations Research Journal, 11(1), 126-152. (In Russ. and Engl.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845/2016-01-126

Larionova, M.V., & Shelepov, A.V. (2019). The G20, G7 and BRICS in global economic governance. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(4), 48-71. (In Russ. and Engl.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2019-04-03

Lebedeva, M.M. (2016). System of political organization of the world: “perfect storm”. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2, 125-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-134-144

Lebedeva, M.M. (2025). BRICS in the transforming political organization of the world. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 18(4), 66-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2025-4-103-66-84

Lebedeva, M.M. (2026). BRICS cities: creating a networking. International Organisations Research Journal, 21(1). (In Russ. and Engl.)

Lebedeva, M.M. (Ed.). (2008). Privatizatsiya” mirovoy politiki: lokal’nyye deystviya – global’nyye  rezul’taty [“Privatization” of world politics: local actions – global results]. Moscow: Golden-Bi. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva, M.M., & Kuznetsov, D.A. (2024). The place of BRICS in the emerging system of political organization of the world. In Rossiya v politsentrichnom mirovom poryadke: vyzovy i novyye paradigmy razvitiya. Materialy Х Vserossiyskogo kongressa politologov RAPN s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem [Russia in a Polycentric World Order: Challenges and New Development Paradigms. Proceedings of the 10th All-Russian Congress of Political Scientists of the RAPS with International Participation] (pp. 347-348). Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Semenova, M.S. (2024). Expansion of BRICS in Russian and foreign expert assessments. Governance and Politics, 3(2), 8-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2024-3-2-8-26

Sergunin, A.A., & Gao, F. (2018). BRICS as the subject of study of international relations theory. International Organisations Research Journal, 13(4), 55-73. (In Russ. and Engl.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-04-03

Smorgunov, L.V. (2001). The network approach to policy making and governance. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 103-112. (In Russ.)

Voevoda, E. (2015). Communication barriers of the BRICS educational space. International Trends, 13(4), 108-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2015.13.4.43.8

Zhao, H., & Lesage, D. (2020). Explaining BRICS outreach: motivations and institutionalization. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 93-124. (In Russ. and Engl.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-05

See also: