print

“The struggle for the child's soul”:
managing history through school education in Europe

Vorotnikov V.V.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, v.vorotnikov@my.mgimo.ru

ORCID: 0000-0003-3374-5677 | RESEARCHER_ID: G-4146-2014

Sergeev E.A.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, sergeev.e.a@my.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 914172 | ORCID: 0000-0001-9964-9595 |

Article received: 2026.04.29 11:45. Accepted: 2026.07.27 11:45


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2026.05.05
EDN: XYYHJC

Rubric: Theme of the issue: 50th Anniversary of the MGIMO Institute of international studies

For citation:

Vorotnikov V.V., Sergeev E.A. “The struggle for the child's soul”: managing history through school education in Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2026. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2026.05.05. EDN: XYYHJC (In Russ.)

Abstract

The article examines the transformation of school history education in Western European countries, which is influenced by political and supranational factors. This framing appears particularly relevant amid the growing role of historical scholarship as a tool of political legitimation and self-identification amid mounting informational instability and intensifying debates around historical memory. The authors proceed from the assumption that the European Union deliberately employs the historical myth of a unified “European process” (with the EU at its helm) to strengthen its own position in the architecture of global governance, including through education, while simultaneously instilling favorable narratives throughout the education system. The aim of the work is to provide a systematic overview of disparate narratives of history education in Western Europe in order to demonstrate the patterns of the EU's distorting interference in the governance of educational processes. The theoretical and methodological foundation of the research comprises the concepts of postnational memory, Europeanisation, as well as the logic of structural approaches to the participation of individual actors in international interaction. The authors posit that since the 1990s the European Union has been consistently implementing a strategy of “Europeanisation” of history education, expressed in a shift in emphasis from a narrative-chronological approach to a problem-based one, the imposition of specific value parameters oriented precisely toward the achievements of the “European process” (as framed by the EU), and the formation of pan-European inclusive narratives. Using the examples of Greece's and France's school textbooks, those of Benelux countries, and post-socialist states, the authors demonstrate the substitution of a coherent national historical narrative with a teleological vision of a “united Europe” as the culmination of historical development. The activities of specific regional organizations, bilateral commissions, and EU educational platforms are presented as instruments of structural power aimed at disseminating the mythologized image of the Union. At the same time, through the spread of this educational discourse, the political presence of the European Union itself is also reinforced. Overall, it can be argued that the ultimately imposed postmodernist relativism, individualism, and general fragmentation of historical knowledge in school curricula reduce the educational potential of the discipline and instill in students a distorted perception of the place of the individual in history.

Keywords

history education, historical memory, the European Union, governance, discourse, Europeanisation of education.

Ahonen, S. (2020). The construction and deconstruction of national myths: A study of the transformation of Finnish history textbook narratives after World War II. European Politics and Society, 21, 341-355. https:// doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1645427

Barker, B. (2002). Values and practice: history teaching 1971-2001. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220116436

Berezhnaya, L., & Hein-Kircher, H. (2025). The sacralization of history in modern Eastern Europe. Budapest: Central European University*22Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789048570171_ch01

Cajani, L. (2018). History teaching for the unification of Europe: the case of the Council of Europe. In Bevernage, B., & Wouters, N. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945 (pp. 289-305). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_15

Delgado, A., & Mycock, A. (Eds.). (2023). Conflicts in history education in Europe: political context, history teaching, and national identity. Emerald Publishing.

Dierkes, J. (2010). Postwar history education in Japan and the Germanys: guilty lessons. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864586

Gadourek, I. (1961). A dutch community: social and cultural structure and process in a bulb-growing region in the Netherlands. Groningen: Wolters.

Hamourtziadou, L., & tukasik, P. (2026). The construction of a mnemonic order using history. In The Role of Memory in War Politics and Post-Conflict Reconciliation (pp. 1-8). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003653004

Lermyte, J.-M. (1985). Voor de ziel van het kind. De schoolstrijd in het klerikale arrondissement Roeselare 1878-1887. Brugge: Westvlaams Verbond van Kringen voor Heemkunde.

Milward, A. (2002). Historical teleologies. In European Integration in the 21st Century: Unity in Diversity? (pp. 107-125). London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221051.n2

Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educational Review, 29(4), 297-318.

Pingel, F. (2000). The European Home: representations of twentieth-century Europe in history textbooks. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Radaelli, C.M. (2003). The Europeanization of public policy. In Featherstone, K., & Radaelli, C.M. (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (pp. 27-56). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.003.0002

Rumyantsev, S. (2025). Education and the politics of memory in Russia and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003505822

Sakki, I., Hakokongas, E., Brescd de Luna, I., Csertd, I., Kello, K., Miguel, I., O’Mahoney, J., P6lya, T., & Pires Valentim, J. (2021). European unification as lived memory: shared and diverse representations in textbooks of six countries. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(3), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12448

Schou Therkildsen, L. (2023). A European state of mind: rhetorical formations of European identity within the EU 1973-2014. Centre for European Research.

Schuyt, K., & Taverne, E. (2004). Dutch culture in a European perspective: 1950, prosperity and welfare. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Smets, W. (2024). The purposes of historical canons in multicultural history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(3), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2328050

Stobart, M. (1999). Fifty years of European co-operation on history textbooks: the role and contribution of the Council of Europe. Internationale Schulbuchforschung, 21(2), 147-161.

Tyssens, J. (1998). Om de schone ziel van ’t kind... Het onderwijsconflict als een breuklijn in de Belgische politiek. Gent: Liberaal Archief.

van der Vlies, T., & Utami, I.W.P. (2026). Decolonization and transnational memory: the Revolusi in Indonesian and Dutch history education, 1950-2025. History and Memory, 38(1), 106-143. https://doi.org/10.2979/ham.00031

Wilschut, A.H.J. (2010). History at the mercy ofpoliticians and ideologies: Germany, England, and the Netherlands in the 19th and 20th centuries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(5), 693-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903049446

Young, N. (2019). Postnational Memory, Peace and War: Making Pasts Beyond Borders. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429024801

Zajda, J., & Whitehouse, J. (2024). Globalisation, Nation-Building and History Education. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44813-3

Efremenko, D.V. (2018). Istoricheskaya pamyat' i nadnatsional'naya identichnost'. Sluchay Evropeyskogo soyuza [Historical memory and supranational identity. The case of the European Union]. In Miller, A.I., & Efremenko, D.V. (Eds.), Metodologicheskiye voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati [Methodological Issues in Memory Politics Studies] (pp. 110-126). Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)

Fadeeva, L.A. (2022). Memory and identity politics in the European Union: related concepts, disparate practices. Journal of International Analytics, 13(3), 79-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-79-93

Gladishev, A.V. (2010). Formation of historical memory: school textbooks and the French Revolution. Istoriya i Istoricheskaya Pamyat', 2, 30-60. (In Russ.)

Khauer-Tyukarkina, O.M. (2016). The European Union as a political myth. Russian Political Science, 1, 124-136. (In Russ.)

Lifanov, S.S. (2021). Historical memory and supranational identity in Western European states. Diskurs- Pi, 18(4), 78-93. (In Russ.)

Litvak, N.V. (2015). School history as a method of formation of political consciousness in contemporary France. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 6, 146-154. (In Russ.).

Miller, A.I. (2016). Memory politics in post-Communist Europe. Politeia, 1, 111-121. (In Russ.)

Polyakova, N.V. (2021). School education in France as a tool for “reinforcing the principles of Republicanism”: Renewing Traditions. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 62, 139-152. (In Russ.)

Sergeev, E.A. (2023). Separatism in Belgium: key factors governing Walloon-Flemish discrepancies. Comparative Politics Russia, 14(4), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2023-4-14-9-38. (In Russ.)

Signaevskaya, O.V. (2012). Man in the epoch of postmodernism: life world and the point of meaning origin. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 4, 11-16. (In Russ.)

Trubnikova, N.V. (2018). “To allow the past as a history”: on the influence of postmodernism on historiography in the 21st century. Tomsk State University Journal, 436, 192-198. (In Russ.)

See also: