Typology of Forms of Government:
Rectification of Mistakes
Zaznaev O.I.,
Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Political Science Department, Oleg.Zaznaev@kpfu.ru
elibrary_id: 199322 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.01.07
Zaznaev O.I. Typology of Forms of Government: Rectification of Mistakes . – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.01.07
"To this day the question of typology of forms of government has not yet found adequate solution. The numbers of types being singled out range between two types and several dozens of types, nor is there unanimity as to which type this or that country should be attributed to. Analyzing the situation as it has formed, the author comes to the conclusion that the reason of such discordance roots not so much in the object itself being classified, as in the “traps” awaiting researchers who disregard logical rules and procedures. On stating some of the most widely spread mistakes (choosing an inessential criterion of typology
See also:
Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3
Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4
Dolgov V.M.,
Political Mechanisms of Interaction of the Center and Regions of the Russian Federation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6
Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5
Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1