Moral Economics and Moral Politics, or Fiscal Hide-and-Seek
Rubric: Version
For citation:
Blyakher L.Ye. Moral Economics and Moral Politics, or Fiscal Hide-and-Seek . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 1
Abstract
In the author’s opinion, lack of an efficient mechanism of interaction between the state and the economic sphere results in that a considerable part of the economic sector assumes features of informal economy. This is especially noticeable in the interaction of the state power and economy subjects regarding fiscal policy. It is demonstrated in the article that alongside with formal tax legislation there exist a lot of informal norms regulating taxation at different levels. And none of the levels, for that matter, is as strong as to entirely determine all the other. Such “semi-official” practice of tax collection makes the attempts of the federal power to bring order into the fiscal sphere problematic.
Content No. 1, 2001
See also:
Lukin A.V.,
The Transition Period in Russia: Democratization and Liberal Reforms. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No2
Oleskin A.V.,
Network Structures of Society from the Viewpoint of Biopolitics. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No1
Sokolskaya I.B.,
Is the Conservative Revolution Conservative? (On a Chronological Scale of Political Theories). – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No6
Kulpin E.S.,
How to Transform Ourselves?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No4
Blyakher L.Ye.,
Want of Nationalism, or National Self-Consciousness in Russia’s Far East. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3