Geopolitical Analysis of the International Problems of Modernity:
Pro et Contra
Rubric: ORBIS TERRARUM
For citation:
Solovyov E.G. Geopolitical Analysis of the International Problems of Modernity: Pro et Contra . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 6
Abstract
The author makes an attempt to verify judgments, rather widely spread in modern Russia, as to unconditional significance, both in theory and as being practically applied, of geopolitical ideas and methods. The causes of geopolitics’ especial attractiveness for politicians and theoreticians of right-radical and left orientations are analyzed. The qualitative changes that took place in Western geopolitics after the cold war ended, are then described. Problematics of bipolarity, unipolarity, multipolarity and of a uni-multipolar system are discussed in detail. Finally, processes of expansion of the research field of geopolitics, first of all owing to geoeconomics, are characterized. Absolutely state-centered character of geopolitical analysis is qualified as its most vulnerable point. As for the most promising spheres of geopolitical theorizing, E.G.Solovyov numbers among them analytical study of regional expanses.
Content No. 6, 2001
See also:
Palmowski T., Fedorov G.M.,
Russian-Polish Borderland: Problems and Prospects for the Development of Cross-Border Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No2
Zamyatin D.N.,
Geopolitics: Major Problems and Results of Development in the 20th Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6
Safonov M.V.,
Modern Approaches to the Study of International Institutions (With Studies of the “Big Eight” as Instance). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3
Sakwa R.,
Back to the Wall: Myths and Mistakes that Made the Ukraine Crisis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No4
Korotayev A.V., Bilyuga S.E., Shishkina A.R.,
Correlation between GDP per Capita and Protest Intensity: a Quantitative Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No2