The “Funnel of Causality” in Electoral Studies

The “Funnel of Causality” in Electoral Studies


Meleshkina Ye.Yu.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Head of the Department of Political Science, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
elibrary_id: 192463 |



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2002.05.05
Rubric: LABORATORY

For citation:

Meleshkina Ye.Yu. The “Funnel of Causality” in Electoral Studies . – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2002.05.05



Abstract

It is experience of the “funnel of causality” model used in the study of electoral behaviour that the author analyzes in her article. On having discussed in detail the “classical variant” of the “funnel of causality”, proposed in 1960 by A.Campbell and his colleagues in a monograph entitled “American Voter”, as well as its version elaborated by E.Oppenhuis, the author then turns to constructing her own model adapted to Russian conditions. This model, by the author’s recognition, is of a pronouncedly abstract character, and its fruitful employment in the analysis of Russian voters’ behaviour requires, for one thing, adequate operationalization of the factors represented in it and, for another, obtaining of relevant empirical data.

 
(электронная версия)

Content No. 5, 2002

See also:


Grigorieva E.I.,
Once Again on Ethics of Scientific Publications. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5

Linetsky A.I.,
Latent lnstitutions: standard behavior patterns occurred spontaneously and their political meaning. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No6

Melkumian K.S.,
Informal Structure in the Center of the Counter-Terrorism Financing Regime: Effectiveness Issues. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No2

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Smorgunov L.V., , Medushevsky A.N., Yeliseyev S.M., Isayev B.A., Mitrokhina T.N., Baranov N.A., ,
Moisey Ostrogorski and traditions of political science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No4

Melville A.Yu.,
The “Funnel of Causality” Methodology as Intermediary Synthesis of “Structure and Agency” in the Analysis of Democratic Transitions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991