.jpg)
printIdeas and Values as a Method of Constructing Symbolic Space of the National Identity
Pushkaryova G.V.,
Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Professor, Political Analysis Department, Faculty of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, pushkarjeva@spa.msu.ru
elibrary_id: 76897 | ORCID: 0000-0003-1567-5652 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAB-2181-2022
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.11
Rubric: Laboratory
For citation:
Pushkaryova G.V. Ideas and Values as a Method of Constructing Symbolic Space of the National Identity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.05.11
Abstract
The nation is seen as an “imaginary political community” [Anderson 2001] whose construction is carried out using symbols that form the national symbolic space. National identity is defined as a special kind of psychological connection of a person with a political nation that makes an individual sensitive to what concerns his state, his country. The main hypothesis of the study: if formation of a nation is the creation of symbolic forms in which the jointly created representations are embodied, then the national identity is formed in the process of interiorization of these symbolic forms, their reflection in the psyche of people. The paper distinguishes between two types of symbols: symbols-significators that perform a nominative function, and symbols-integrators (mythologems and ideologemes) that carry semantic interpretations of the image of the nation. It is shown that symbols-significators, unlike simple signs, can cause certain emotional states in which the individual’s sensate attitude to his nation is displayed. Symbols-integrators form a symbolic universe of the nation, i.e. a complex of structures that can be deployed in areas that are inaccessible to actual perception and that are beyond the immediate human experience. The significance of the symbolic universe for the formation of national identity is not only in its special role in constructing the image of a nation, a kind of collective We, but also in its inherent ability to recreate, actualize in the human psyche an emotional attitude to this image. The inevitability and contradictory nature of the renewal of the symbolic universe is substantiated. The conditions under which the symbolic universe is unable to maintain a unified system of representations, the image of the collective We are determined. It is shown that, as a result of the emergence of such conditions, the symbolic universe loses the function of forming a national identity. The special role of the state in maintaining the integrity of the national symbolic universe is revealed. The Russian symbolic universe is characterized as problematic, experiencing a period of heated discussions on issues of national self-determination; however, it has not lost its consolidating function. It is shown that the national identity of most Russians is formed through the interiorization of the symbols of statehood.
Keywords
ideas and values; national symbols; symbolic space; national identity; symbolic universe; symbol-significators; symbols-integrators; symbolic policy of the state.
References
Anderson B. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. (Russ. ed.: Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. Moscow: KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole. 2001. 288 p.)
Anikin V.A. Crisis and Russian National Identity. – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2016. No. 5. P. 203-232. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.5.12
Berger P.L., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. (Russ. ed.: Berger P.L., Luckmann T. Sotsial’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. Moscow: Medium.1995. 323 p.)
Cassirer E. Opyt o cheloveke: Vvedenie v filosofiyu chelovecheskoi kul‘tury [An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture]. – Problema cheloveka v zapadnoi filosofii [The Problem of Man in Western Philosophy]. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1988. P. 3-30. (In Russ.) URL: http://anthropolo-gy.ru/ru/text/kassirer-e/opyt-o-cheloveke-vvedenie-v-filosofiyu-chelovecheskoy-kultury (accessed 10.08.2017).
Drobizheva L.M. Ethnic Solidarity, Civil Consolidation and Prospects for Inter-Ethnic Harmony in the Russian Federation. – Social Sciences and Contemporary World Journal. 2014. No. 1. P. 119-129. (In Russ.)
Drobizheva L.M., Ryzhova S.V. Civic and Ethnic Identity and Perception of the Preferable State in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 5. P. 9-24 (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.05.03
Dubin B. Vectors and Levels of Collective Identification in Today’s Russia. – The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions. 2009. No. 2. P. 55-65. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.levada.ru/sites/default/files/vom_2009.2_100.pdf (accessed 10.08.2017).
Fadeeva L.A. Kto my? Intelligentsiya v bor’be za identichnost’ [Who Are We? Intellectuals in the Struggle for Identity]. Moscow: Novyi khronograf. 2012. 320 p. (In Russ.)
Gorshkov M.K. Modernizatsionnyi potentsial identichnosti (Vmesto predisloviya) [Modernization Potential of Identity (Instead of the Preface]. – Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. Vypusk 12: Ezhegodnik. Otv. red. M.K. Gorshkov [Russia is Reforming. Issue 12: Yearbook. Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov. Moscow: Novyi khronograf. 2013. P. 3-20. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.isras.ru/files/File/ezhegodnik/2013/Gorshkov_Ejegod_2014.pdf (accessed 10.08.2017).
Gudkov L. Negativnaya identichnost’. Stat’i 1997-2002 godov [Negative Identity. Articles of 1997-2002]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, “VTsIOM-A”. 2004. 816 p. (In Russ.)
Gudkov L. Structure and Functions of Russian Anti-Americanism: Mobilization Phase 2012-2015. – The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions. 2015. No. 3-4. P. 15-44. (In Russ.)
Huddy L., Khatib N. American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement. – American Journal of Political Science. 2007. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 63-77. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4122906 (accessed: 10.08.2017).
Huntington S.P. Who Are We? The Challenges To America’s National Identity. (Russ. ed.:
Huntington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoi natsional’noi identichnosti. Moscow: ACT; Tranzitkniga. 2004. 635 p.)
Jung C.G. Arkhetip i simvol [Archetype and Symbol. One-Volume Works]. Moscow: Renessans. 1991. 343 p. (In Russ.)
Kortunov S.V. Natsional’naya identichnost’: Postizhenie smysla [National Identity: Comprehension of Meaning]. Moscow: Aspect Press. 2009. 589 p. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.ino-center.ru/doc/national- identity.pdf (accessed 10.08.2017).
Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo [The Symbol Problem and Realistic Art]. Moscow: Isskustvo. Publishers. 1995. 320 p. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.odinblago.ru/filosofiya/losev/losev_problema_ sim/ (accessed 10.08.2017).
Malinova O.Yu. Symbolic Politics and the Construction of Macro-Political Identity in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No. 2. P. 90-105. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2010/2/8.pdf (accessed 10.08.2017).
Perspektivy razvitiya politicheskoi psikhologii: novye napravleniya. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Prospects for the Development of Political Psychology: New Directions. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta. 2012. 496 p. (In Russ.)
Pipiia K.D. Identification portraits of Russians (on The ISSP and Levada-Сenter data). – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2016. No. 3. P. 38-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.3.03
Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnosti: ocherki. Pod red. O.I. Zaznaeva [Political Identity and Identity Policy: Essays. Ed. by O.I. Zaznayev]. Kazan’: Otechestvo Publishers. 2011. 230 p. (In Russ.)
Popova O.V. Specific Features of Political Identity in Russia and in European Countries. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No. 1. P. 143-157. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2009/1/11.pdf(accessed 10.08.2017).
Pushkaryova G.V. Mekhanizmy formirovaniya politicheskikh identichnostei v politicheskom prostranstve sovremennogo obshchestva [Mechanisms for the Formation of Political Identities in the Political Space of Modern Society]. – Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnosti. T. 2. Identichnost’ kak kategoriya politicheskoi nauki. Identichnost’ i sotsial’no-politicheskie izmeneniya v XXI veke [Political Identity and Identity Politics. Vol. 2. Identity and Socio-Political Changes in the 21st century. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 2012. P. 99-113. (In Russ.)
Pushkaryova G.V. Homo politicus: chelovek politicheskii [Homo Politicus: a Political Man]. Moscow: Argamak-Media. 2014. 336 p. (In Russ.)
Rossiiskaya identichnost’ v sotsiologicheskom izmerenii. Analiticheskii doklad [Russian Identity in the Sociological Dimension. Analytical Report]. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2007. 140 p. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.isras.ru/analytical_report_Ident.html (accessed 10.08.2017).
Santi-Mazzini D. Araldica: Storia, linguaggio, simboli e significati dei blasoni e delle armi. (Russ. ed.: Santi-Mazzini D. Heraldry. History, Terminology, Symbols and Meanings of Coats of Arms and Emblems. Moscow: AST; Astrel. 2007. 594 p.)
Shyuts A. Formirovanie ponyatiya i teorii v obshchestvennykh naukakh [Formation of the concept and theory in the social sciences]. – Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl’: Teksty. Pod red. V.I. Dobren’kova [American Sociological Thought: Texts. Ed. by V.I. Dobrenkov]. Moscow: Moscow State University publishers. 1994. P. 481-496. (In Russ.)
Semenenko I.S. Politicheskaya natsiya, natsional’noe gosudarstvo i grazhdanskaya identichnost’: na puti v global’nyi mir [Political Nation, National State and Civil Identity: On the Way to the Global World]. – Politicheskaya identichnost’ i politika identichnosti. T. 2. Identichnost’ kak kategoriya politicheskoi nauki. Identichnost’ i sotsial’no-politicheskie izmeneniya v XXI veke [Political Identity and Identity Politics. Vol. 2. Identity and Socio-Political Changes in the 21st Century. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 2012. P. 41-71. (In Russ.)
Shestopal E.B. Psychological Status of Russian Society between the Latest Parliamentary and the Future Presidential Elections. Comparative Analysis. – Comparative Politics Russia. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 119-129. (In Russ.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-119-129
Soboleva N.A. Rossiiskaya gosudarstvennaya simvolika. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [Russian State Symbols. History and Contemporaneity]. Moscow: Vlados. 2003. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Urnov M.Yu. Emotsii v politicheskom povedenii [Emotions in Political Behavior]. Moscow: Aspect Press. 2008. 240 p. (In Russ.)
Tishkov V.A. Natsional’naya identichnost’ i dukhovno-kul’turnye tsennosti rossiiskogo naroda [National Identity and Spiritual and Cultural Values of the Russian People]. St. Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences (SPbGUP). 2010. 36 p. (In Russ.)
Yadov V.A. Social and Socio-Psychological Mechanisms of the Formation of the Social Identity of the Individual. – Mir Rossii. 1995. No. 3-4. P. 158-181. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.isras.ru/files/File/Publication/Mir_Rossii_1995_no3-4_Yadov.pdf (accessed 10.08.2017).
Content No. 5, 2017
See also:
Zvyagelskaya I.D.,
Symbols and Values in International Relations in the Middle East. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1
Evgenyeva T.V., Titov V.V.,
Nation-State Identity Formation of the Russian Youth. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No
Evgenyeva T.V., Selezneva A.V.,
Soviet Past in Value, Image and Symbolic Space of Russian Identity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No3
Solovyov A.I.,
Political Ideology: the Logic of Historical Evolution. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No2
Martynov M.Yu., Fadeyeva L.A., Gaberkorn A.I.,
Patriotism as Political Discourse in Contemporary Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)