The Civilizational Model Of International Relations And Its Implications (A Scholarly Discussion at the Editoprial Office)


Pantin I.K.,

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), chief researcher, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Russia, i.pantin@mail.ru

Khoros V.G.,

Head of the Center for Development and Modernization Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, khoros@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 72733 |

Kara-Murza A.A.

Panarin A.S.

Rashkovsky Ye.B.

Tzymbursky V.L.

Umov V.I.

Ilyin M.V.,

Dr. of Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor in Ordinary of National Research University Higher School of Economics, Professor of Department of Comparative Political Science Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the MFA of Russia, Head of the Center for Advanced Methodologies of Social and Humanitarian Research Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences RAS, Moscow, Russia, ilyin@politstudies.ru

Discussion.



For citation:

Pantin I.K., Khoros V.G., Kara-Murza A.A., Panarin A.S., Rashkovsky Ye.B., Tzymbursky V.L., Umov V.I., Ilyin M.V., Discussion. The Civilizational Model Of International Relations And Its Implications (A Scholarly Discussion at the Editoprial Office) . – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No 1. P. 121 (In Russ.)



Abstract
"The ""Civilizational Model"" Of International Relations And Its Implications (A Scholarly Discussion at the Editoprial Office): I. K. Pantin. From ""Immanent Critique"" to a Conceptual Interpretation. By Way of an Introduction. •V.G.Khoros. ""Clash""? Or ""Concert"" of Civilizations in a Universal Modernizing Process? • A.A.Kara-Murza. Western Liberalism: A New Discovery of the Poly-Subject Nature of the World. •A.S.Panarin. ""The End of the Liberal Epoch"" or Culture-Centered Developments as a Post-Industrial Socio-Cultural ""Retro"" Phase? •Ye.B.Rashkovsky.A New Version of Determinism versus Civilizational Reality. • V.L.Tzymbursky.ASubject forthe Leader-Civilization to Enact: Self-Defence or Self-Destruction? (In Polemics with S.Huntington's Version) • V.I.Umov. The Civilizational Paradigm in the Light of the Geoeconomic and Geopolitical Revolution. • M.V.Ilyin. The World Communication as a Problem of ""Polygloty"". • By Way of Shorf Conclusions"

Content No 1, 1995

See also:


Levyash I.Ya.,
Middle Europe: Structure and Geopolitical Choice. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No1

Sestanovich S.,
Give Russia Its Due. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No1

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Ilyin M.V., Tzymbursky V.L., Alekseyeva T.A., Kara-Murza A.A., Ilyin V.V., Pantin V.I., Zadokhin A.G., Andreyev A.L., Perevalov V.P., Abolin O.Yu., Polyakov L.V., Vasil’tzov S.I., Sorokin K.E.,
National Interest (A Round Table): M.V.Ilyin, V.L.Tzymbursky, T.A.Alexeyeva, A.A.Kara-Murza, V.V.Ilyin, V.I.Pantin, A.G.Zadokhin, A.L.Andreyev, V.P.Perevalov, O.Yu.Abolin, L.V.Polyakov, S.I.Vasilzov, K.E.Sorokin. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No1

Sorokin K.E.,
Geopolitics of the Contemporary World and Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No1

Gelbras V.G.,
China after Deng Xiaoping: Problems of Stable Development. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No1

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991