”Russian System” as an Essay of Grasping Russian History


Pivovarov Yu.S.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Academician, Academic Supervisor, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Comparative Political Science Department, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, Russia, dir@inion.ru

Fursov A.I.



For citation:

Pivovarov Yu.S., Fursov A.I. ”Russian System” as an Essay of Grasping Russian History . – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No. 4. P. 37. (In Russ.)



Abstract
The authors regard Power as the most important and structure-generating element of the Russian political system that had been forming since the 16th century as an alternative to the West’s capitalist system. The Population and the Superfluous Man (individual or collective) appear in their concept as the other two elements of the system. The only socially significant subject of the Russian system, for that matter, has always been, in the authors’ opinion, the Power. The authors note, among its main characteristics, its being of a “mono-subject” nature and its “remoteness”.The main among the reasons that preconditioned its emergence, they maintain, was the influence exerted on Rus by the Tataro-Mongolian inroad and the two hundred years domination of the Horde. Yu.S.Pivovarov and A.I.Fursov put the greatest socio-political collisions of the past five hundred years of Russian history in relation with the redivisions of Power. Each of these redivisions, they contend, meant the rise of a new group “beside the Power” that invariably turned out more numerous and poorer than the previous one. With Communism, the Power was, as it were, washed out all over Russia, the Population turned out, for the first time, to be included into it. The authors come to the conclusion that Communism and its end became the logical result of Russian Power’s self-expansion.

Content No. 4, 2001

See also:


Makarenko V.P.,
Intentions and Consequences in Politics (To the Analysis of Cognitive Elements of Democracy). – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No4

Glebova I.I.,
The Power Party. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No2

Pastukhov V.B.,
Ukraine Not with Russia (Causes and Consequences of Strategic Errors of Russian Policy towards Ukraine). – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No1

Veber A.B.,
World Development Policy: Between the Reality of Globalization and the Imperative of Stability. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No5

Chikharyov I.A.,
Chronopolitical Studies: An Essay of Synthesis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No6

 
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991