Russian Choice:
Made, Postponed, Cancelled?


Ilyin M.V.,

Dr. of Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor in Ordinary of National Research University Higher School of Economics, Professor of Department of Comparative Political Science Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the MFA of Russia, Head of the Center for Advanced Methodologies of Social and Humanitarian Research Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences RAS, Moscow, Russia, ilyin@politstudies.ru

elibrary_id: 1332 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.02.13
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Ilyin M.V. Russian Choice: Made, Postponed, Cancelled? – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 2. P. 157-163. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.02.13



Abstract

In this article composed in the genre of polemical notes, the thesis substantiated is to the effect that antinomy as assimilated by the very existence, far from being Russia’s fatal misfortune, is, instead, a fundamental mode, characteristic of the Modern epoch, of mastering contradiction. The author argues that modern representative democracy, civil society, federalism are in each respective case nothing else but the result of compromise, and of heterovectorial alternatives united. According to his conclusion, it is exactly acceptance of the antinomies of modern existence that allows to avoid revolutions with the shocks they bring, and to substitute small preference-choices for them. Therefore, he maintains, there can be no other “total” choice but the one consisting in “choosing” to make choice continual and never final, to learn to accept the modern world in which democracy, federation, civil society and other “values” are combined with their alternatives and form antinomical unities.

 Full Text (электронная версия)

Content No. 2, 2003

See also:


Pastukhov V.B.,
Medvedev and Putin: double-thinking as an alternative to dual power. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No6

Shaptalov B.N.,
Russia’s Choice in the Light of “Classic Democracy”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Lapayeva V.V.,
Why the Intellectual Class of Russia Needs a Party of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Melville A.Yu.,
So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Ban’kovskaya S.P.,
Migration, Freedom and Citizenship: Paradoxes of Marginalization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
4 2014


Smorgunov L.V.
Network political parties

  Полный текст
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991