Methodological Approaches and Conceptual Models Involved in the Interpretation of Political Decisions (III)


Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich,

Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Faculty of Political Science, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Moscow, Russia



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.03.15
Rubric: Chair

For citation:

Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich Methodological Approaches and Conceptual Models Involved in the Interpretation of Political Decisions (III) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 3. P. 152-163. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.03.15



Abstract

The third part of A.A.Degtyaryov’s article completes the cycle of publications on theory of political decision making (PDM). (For the first two parts of the article, see: Polis, 2003, № 1, 2). In this concluding fragment, the author discloses the content of the organizational-institutional approach, as well as of the models of the political government cycle. The scholar carries out comparative analysis of the PDM models and comes to the conclusion that in the whole of political science it has not, even up to now, turned out possible to create a theory that would be able to embrace, i.e. to reflect in a complex way, all the main systems of societally significant decision making. As the grand total of all the three parts of the article, its concluding part contains a compound table designed to demonstrate the diversity of all the methodological approaches that have been dwelled upon in the article, of their disciplinary sources, of political agents’ functions and dominating motivations.

 Full Text (электронная версия)

Content No. 3, 2003

See also:


Kapustin B.G.,
What Is Political Philosophy? (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No1

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Vorozheykina T.Ye., Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich, Kapustin B.G., Polyakov L.V.,
On a Reform in Teaching Political Sciences within the Higher-Educational System of Russian Federation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No1

Akhremenko A.S.,
Spatial Modeling of Electoral Choice: Development, Modern Problems and Prospects (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Ushakin S.A.,
The Youth as Subject of Activity (Essay of a Review of Methodological Approaches). – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2

Glinchikova A.G.,
The Education Joins the Market. – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4

 
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991