Institutional Construction and Informal Institutions in Modern Russian Politics


Gelman V.Ya.,

Cand. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Prof., Faculty of Political Sciences and Sociology, European University at St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg, Russia, gelman@eu.spb.ru



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.04.02
For citation:

Gelman V.Ya. Institutional Construction and Informal Institutions in Modern Russian Politics . – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 4. P. 6-25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.04.02



Abstract

"Informal institutionalization", i.e. displacement of formal institutions by informal rules, is one of wide-spread consequences of post-authoritarian (including post-communist) transformations. Russia has likewise failed to avoid it. What are then the reasons of the emergence, the mechanism of the formation, and the tendencies of the evolution, of informal institutions in Russian politics? Perfectly aware of the fact that a comprehensive answer to this question requires concerted efforts of different social disciplines, the author has made an attempt to outline some orientations for the analysis of the research problem it implies. The article consists of three parts and a Conclusion. The 1st part contains a critical review of the existing variants of explaining the domination of informal institutions in our country, and a substantiation of the necessity to complement the structural approach with the procedural one; the 2nd offers a procedural model of the informal institutionalization process; the 3d inquires into the logic of the rise and consolidation of informal institutions in the course of institutional construction (with the reform of the election process institutions as example); in the Conclusion potential effects of informal institutions are discussed, from the viewpoint of Russia's political regime's dynamics. According to the author's conclusion, the "informal institutionalization" is most likely to prove to be not just a transient "defect" of Russian political regime (in the sense of a deviation from a "correct" way of development), but, rather, its long-term and fundamental characteristic.

 Full Text (электронная версия)

Content No. 4, 2003

See also:


Solovyov A.I.,
Transcellular Structures as Form of Construction and Source of Self-Development of the State. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No6

Muskhelishvili M.,
Particularistic Democracy: a View from Post-Soviet Georgia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No5

Pshizova S.N.,
Politics as a Business: Russian Version (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No3

Astafyev Ya.U.,
Post-Modernism in Cognition of Society.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1992. No3

Korgunyuk Yu.G.,
Modern Russia’s Political Elite as Viewed from the Angle of Social Representation (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No2

 
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991