On Kenneth Waltz’ Neorealism


Konyshev V.N.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor, Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Saint Petersburg State University, konyshev06@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 202300 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.02.14
Rubric: Chair

For citation:

Konyshev V.N. On Kenneth Waltz’ Neorealism . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No 2. P. 146-155 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.02.14



Abstract

The article concentrates on the polemic that has been raging around the conception developed by K.Waltz, founder and one of the leading theoreticians of the neorealist trend in the study of international relations. Thorough analysis of the offertions of K.Waltz’s critics brings the author of the article to the conclusion that such criticism, in most cases, as he considers, unfounded, is accounted for by incomprehension of the inner logic of the Waltzian conception. By no means refusing to admit that the neorealist approach has its weak points (emphasis laid on rational nature of the international politics, insufficient elaboration of the question of retroactive influence of a state on the international structure, e.a.), the author is nevertheless convinced that this approach has a powerful heuristic potential, of which it ever retains the use in spite of the tendencies of the modern world — those related to transformation of the international structure, to erosion of the sovereignty and decrease of the role of states, to globalization of the economic and other spheres of international relations.


Content No 2, 2004

See also:


Lvova E.L., Nam I.V., Naumova N.I.,
National- Personal Autonomy: the Idea and the Embodiment. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2

Gelbras V.G.,
China in Russia's Oriental Policy (Opinions and Conceptions of Scientists and Politicans) (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4

Vorobyov D.M.,
Development of Political Science Community in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Pshizova S.N.,
What Party System Will Our Society Accept?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No4

Discussion.,
Discussion at the Polis Editorial Board on Political Science at Higher Educational Institutions. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
5 2008


Rzheshevsky G.A.
Democracy: Myth, Reality, or Boosted Brand?

 The article text
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991