Political Events as Seen by Russians:
Psycological Mechanisms of Perception and of Individual Interpretation

Pushkaryova G.V.,

Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Professor, Political Analysis Department, Faculty of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, pushkarjeva@spa.msu.ru

elibrary_id: 76897 | ORCID: 0000-0003-1567-5652 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAB-2181-2022

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.04.07

For citation:

Pushkaryova G.V. Political Events as Seen by Russians: Psycological Mechanisms of Perception and of Individual Interpretation . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 4. P. 93-102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.04.07


The task the author sets herself in this article is to analyze the processes of perception and interpretation of political events by an individual who is not their immediate participant. Using data of sociological polls, the author finds out that phenomena of political life rather seldom attract respondents’ attention. As exceptions, only such cases figure, that either have the touch of a sensation, or affect the individual’s everyday life, approach problems exciting him or her. At that, moreover, the individual perceives and assimilates with greater preparedness such information that is apt to be easily inscribed in the significance-bearing framework of his or her subjective perceptions of the world of politics. Under certain conditions, however, the individual can turn out able to reconsider his or her earlier formed perceptions, ideas or convictions. Yet, “revision” of one’s own established orientations requires serious psychological endeavour and actually happens only in case the new information is looked upon as affecting the individual’s vital interests or endangering his or her values. In the said case, a political event, as the dynamic aspect of politics, may actualize the individual’s political orientations, rouse him or her to taking certain actions.

Content No. 4, 2004

See also:

Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3

Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Sergeev V.M.,
How Are Social Changes Possible? (Prolegomena to a Statistical Theory of Social Networks). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
5 2016

Andreyev A.L.
“Soft Power”: Arrangement of Senses, Russian Style

 The article text


   2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991