Ukraine Not with Russia (Causes and Consequences of Strategic Errors of Russian Policy towards Ukraine)

Ukraine Not with Russia (Causes and Consequences of Strategic Errors of Russian Policy towards Ukraine)


Pastukhov V.B.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Prof., St. Antony’s College, Oxford, vladimir.pastukhov@gmail.com



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.01.03

For citation:

Pastukhov V.B. Ukraine Not with Russia (Causes and Consequences of Strategic Errors of Russian Policy towards Ukraine) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 1. P. 25-36. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.01.03



Abstract

It is analysis of particular features of the formation and realization of Russia’s policy towards Ukraine that is essayed in the article. In the author’s conclusion, the Moscow political technologists who were taking an active part in the elaboration of the Kremlin’s policy regarding “the Ukrainian question”, overlooked the presence of a classical revolutionary situation in Ukraine, with all its attributes. Having disregarded revolutionary movement as a political infinitesimal whose interests need not be taken into account, Russia acted in defiance of it in the role historically habitual for her, of a European gendarme. A real policy was substituted for by a set of tricks that had shown themselves to advantage in the epoch of “the second stagnation” which had begun in the country in 1994 to 1995. But, as is proved in the article, an immutable condition of effectiveness of such kind of tricks is that multitude lack its own position and lack the desire to interfere into the elites’ fight. Ukraine gives an object-lesson of what is apt to befall political technologies when stagnation is superseded by a revolution.


Content No. 1, 2005

See also:


Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3

Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Sergeev V.M.,
How Are Social Changes Possible? (Prolegomena to a Statistical Theory of Social Networks). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991