Universal Comparisons, with Quantitative Methods of Analysis Applied (A Review of Precedents)


Mironyuk M.G.,

Associate Professor, First Deputy Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, mmironyuk@hse.ru

elibrary_id: 251177 |

Timofeev I.N.,

Cand. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Associate Professor of the Department of Political Theory, MGIMOUniversity; Program Director, Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), itimofeev@russiancouncil.ru

elibrary_id: 236879 | ORCID: 0000-0003-1676-2221 |

Vaslavsky Ya.I.



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.05.04
For citation:

Mironyuk M.G., Timofeev I.N., Vaslavsky Ya.I. Universal Comparisons, with Quantitative Methods of Analysis Applied (A Review of Precedents) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 5. P. 39-57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.05.04



Abstract

After the 1960s – decade which happened to be the peak period of social sciences’ keenness on quantitative methods, – universal comparisons sharply lost in popularity. Yet global researches were not brought to a stop with the end of the boom of the 1960s. The “Freedom House” which has behind it more than half a century of existence, annually works out countries’ ratings by the indices of political rights and civil liberties. The “Transparency International” has elaborated the index of perception of corruption, the “Reporters without Borders” – the Worldwide Press Freedom Index, the “Cato Institute” – the index of economic freedom, A.T.Kearney’s consulting company, in cooperation with the Foreign Policy journal, – the index of globalization, the “Bertelsmann Stiftung” – the Transformation Index, the United Nations Development Program – the human development index, T.R.Gurr and his colleagues – the polity index, T.Vanhanen – the index of democratization, and so on. In the review we are publishing here, brief information about these and some other projects of the kind is presented and their methodology characterized, with its advantages and weaknesses noted.

 


Content No. 5, 2006

See also:


Melville A.Yu., Ilyin M.V., Meleshkina Ye.Yu., Mironyuk M.G., Polunin Yu.A., Timofeev I.N.,
Essay of Countries Classification. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No5

Melville A.Yu.,
“Political Atlas of Modern Time”: Conception and General Theoretical and Methodological Outline of the Project. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No5

Rzheshevsky G.A.,
Democracy: Myth, Reality, or Boosted Brand?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No5


DOSSIER: SOCIAL PROTECTION. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No6


Orbis terrarum. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2

 
 

Archive

   2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991