Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis)


Kazantzev A.A.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Director of the Analytical Center, Institute of International Studies, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), MFA of Russia, andrka@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 123521 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.01.06
ID of the Article:


For citation:

Kazantzev A.A. Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No 1. P. 71-93 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.01.06



Abstract

The motif of the article is analysis of factors determining the significance and the limits of political innovativeness of intelligentsia in the structuring of political space. On the basis of comparative research of the processes of modernization, as well as interaction of the population, bureaucracy and educated social strata in Western Europe, Russia, Islamic countries, India, China and Japan, the author retraces direct connection between the extent to which the intellectuals-intelligentsia are influential, on the one hand, and the level of conflicting character of the modernity institutions’ development – on the other. According to his conclusion, political innovativeness proves to be required first of all under the conditions of catching-up modernization that sharply raises the role of rational projectiveness and widens the gaps between socio-political groups. It is at the same time convincingly demonstrated in the article that political innovativeness of intellectuals-intelligentsia has structural limitations rooted in institutional and cultural-civilizational specificity of modernization in a given country.


Content No 1, 2007

See also:


Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3

Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Sergeyev V.M.,
How Are Social Changes Possible? (Prolegomena to a Statistical Theory of Social Networks). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6

Kolosov V.A., Borodulina N.A.,
Electoral Preferences in Cities and Large Towns of Russia: Types and Stability. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No4

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991