The Sources and the Essence of the Russian Revolution


Pivovarov Yu.S.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Academician, Academic Supervisor, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Comparative Political Science Department, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, Russia, dir@inion.ru



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2007.05.04
For citation:

Pivovarov Yu.S. The Sources and the Essence of the Russian Revolution . – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No. 5. P. 35-55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2007.05.04



Abstract

The article presents a broad panorama of the development of the Russian Revolution in a comparativist context and poses the problem of the structural dimension of this grandiose historical drama. The author proves that the Russian Revolution is a much more profound, larger-scale and more complex phenomenon than the Russian communism. In his opinion, the bolshevist revolution was a more complex historical phenomenon than the Emancipation revolution and the Community ones. No doubt, in Russia, an anthropological catastrophe took place in the century that has just passed, the Russian twentieth century turned out the result of the Revolution that sustained utter defeat. The losers were all: the people, the intelligentsia, the priesthood, the elites etc. The author makes the conclusion that, unfortunately, Russian society doesn’t want to understand it, and this means that the bolshevist revolution is still going on.


Content No. 5, 2007

See also:


Lyubarev A.Ye.,
Voting “Against All”: Motives and Tendencies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No6

Polokhalo V.,
Non-Civil Society as the Ukraine’s Socio-Political Phenomenon (The «Average» Ukrainian’s Social Character as Reflected in the Electoral Process). – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No6

Klyamkin I.M., Timofeyev L.M.,
The Shadow Way of Life (A Sociological Self-Portrait of Post-Soviet Society). – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No5

Kruzhkov A.V.,
Local Self-government in Russia: the Project Meeting with Failure. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Glubotzky A.Yu., Kynev A.V.,
Experience of Mixed-System Elections in Russia’s Regions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No2

 
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991