Chauvinism or chaos:
Russia’s unpalatable choice


Lukin A.V.,

Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Director, Center for East Asian and SCO Studies, MGIMO University, Moscow; Head, Department of International Relations, National Research University Higher School of Economics, avlukin@hse.ru

elibrary_id: 696524 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.03.10

For citation:

Lukin A.V. Chauvinism or chaos: Russia’s unpalatable choice. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No 3. P. 159-171 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.03.10



Abstract

The author’s perspective is that the return of the Crimea to Russia and other events revolving around the political situation in Ukraine, have combined to create a new reality for Russian society. The author believes that it’s totally possible that the entire system of Russian international relations, as well as the internal state ofaffairs in Russia, will never be the same again.Domestically, the Crimean situation has created an unsavory set of options for many Russians. This Catch-22 is based on the fact that the majority of people who want to liberalize Russian society completely lack an understanding of Russia’s national security concerns. Many liberals believe that the decline of Russia’s external influence is necessity for internal liberalization and therefore these two developments are intrinsically linked to each other. Meanwhile, those who support Russia playing its own role in global politics – enhancing Russia’s external influence – are often the proponents of a severely strict domestic political regime, authoritarianism, and even the rebirth of Stalinism. As a result, Russians seem to have an unpalatable choice ahead of them: either support democracy, but be against the augmentation of Russian power on the world stage, thereby calling for Russia’s transformation into a subservient partner of the West, or support the strengthening of Russia, but only under the conditions of dictatorship, nationalism, and threat to all of her neighbors. In the author’s opinion, people should consider a third option that would adequately address the concerns of the majority. This third way is a unification of normal, moderate patriotism with equally moderate liberalism.

Keywords
Russia; Ukraine; Crimea; democracy; liberalism; patriotism; chaos.


Content No 3, 2014

See also:


Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Kara-Murza A.A., Chugrov S.V., Zubov A.B., Rashkovsky Ye.B., , Zhukova O.A.,
Russian liberalism and christian values. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3

Zevina O.G., Makarenko B.I.,
Some peculiarities of political culture of modern Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Inozemtzev V.L.,
«Preventive democracy»: concept. prerequisites of emergence. prospects for Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6

Fedotova V.G.,
Distinctions of political cultures and the international conflicts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No1

Gutorov V.A.,
Alexis de Tocqueville VS Astolphe de Custine: Scientific Discovery or Trivial Aberration?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No4

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991