The West and the “Eurasian Quadriga” (Russia, China, India, Iran)


Khatuntzev S.V.,

Cand. Sci. (Hist.), Assistant professor, Russian History department, Voronezh State University, Staskhat@comch.ru



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2015.06.07
For citation:

Khatuntzev S.V. The West and the “Eurasian Quadriga” (Russia, China, India, Iran). – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 6. P. 45-52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.06.07



Abstract

The author’s key premise is that Russia, China, India and Iran nowadays face the same geopolitical problems and share common goals which include creation of a multipolar world and opposition to the American hegemony. Therefore, these countries should form a strategic continental alliance, so-called“Eurasian quadriga”. The link between Moscow and Beijing (“ChiRussia”) could thereby serve asa consolidating basis for such alliance. Strategically, Beijing’s sea routes used for the delivery of raw materialsand export of Chinese products are rather vulnerable. It tries to overcome this dependency by forming the“New Silk Road”; a significant part of its infrastructure will be situated on the Great Limitrophe. However,the systemic instability, organically inherent to the latter, is unlikely to allow China to achieve this goal.The more reliable Eurasian transport corridors lie primarily in the Russian territory. Moreover, If China issupplied with considerable amount of Russian hydrocarbons, it would be able to form its own foreign andeconomic policy based solely on its own interests rather than the ones of U.S. and the West in general. The most important field of closer cooperation for the members of “Eurasian quadriga” is Central Asia. Theyare interested in maximum elimination of the American influence from the region and in establishing there a system of multilateral relationships with each other, which will bring stability and prosperity to the region.

Keywords
civilizational geopolitics; civilization; Russia; China; India; Iran; the West; USA; the Great Limitrophe; “Eurasian quadriga”.


Content No. 6, 2015

See also:


Utkin A.I.,
Energy resources and geopolitics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Litvinova T.N.,
The Idea of Mongolian Civilization as a Concept of a Multipolar World Order. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No5

Khatuntzev S.V.,
Limitrophes – intercivilizational expanses of the old and new worlds. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Pantin I.K., Khoros V.G., Kara-Murza A.A., Panarin A.S., Rashkovsky Ye.B., Tzymbursky V.L., Umov V.I., Ilyin M.V., Discussion.,
The Civilizational Model Of International Relations And Its Implications (A Scholarly Discussion at the Editoprial Office). – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No1

Mikhailov R.V.,
The Russian-French Dialogue on the Crisis of European Civilization (The 5th Berdyaev Readings in Paris). – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2002


Tarusina I.G.
Dynamics of Political Predispositions of Russia’s Regional Elites (With Saratov Region as Example)

 The article text (электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991