Russian Political Regime in the Rent-estate Perspective


Martyanov V.S.,

Cand. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Associate Professor, Deputy Director, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences (Ural Branch), martianovy@rambler.ru

elibrary_id: 223692 | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7747-0022 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.04.08
Rubric: Russia Today

For citation:

Martyanov V.S. Russian Political Regime in the Rent-estate Perspective. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 4. P. 81-99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.04.08



Abstract

The article posits that contemporary Russian political order presents a reality structured by value and institutionally by competitive principles of legitimating. The process of market-based class structuring that started due to decay of soviet estates was suspended until being finished. The space of distributive exchanges, restoring usual for Russian history estate-rental political order, with an authoritative core (center) of society is now rapidly expanding. Thus social structure of Russia today is a peculiar estate-market symbiosis, within which classes are restructured institutionally and normatively by post-soviet estates. Market based interactions and Modern political institutions are displaced to social periphery that shields the rental-estate core in its communication with an outer worlds and thus provides external legitimacy of the system. Nevertheless, in Russian political theory the traditional concepts describing political order with the terms related only to a thin Modern shield are prevailing. They analyze Russian political order through their internal normativity, even admitting its various deviations from prescribed norm, but they ignore Russian societies’ rental-estate core inherent specific. Thus alternative approaches sensitive to distributive exchanges and attempting to grasp theoretically and methodologically the specific of rental-estate core seem to be more relevant in analyzing Russian political processes. 

Keywords
rental group; estate society; neopatrimonialism; political regime; stratification factors; exchange distribution; modernization; antimodern consensus.


Content No. 4, 2016

See also:


Martyanov V.S.,
In Search of Another Mainstream. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No4

Glinchikova A.G.,
Democratic modernization and national culture. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6

Martyanov V.S.,
The Global Modern, postmaterial values and periphery capitalism in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1

Linetsky A.I.,
Modernization of Traditional Societies: A Way to Prosperity or a Road to Nowhere?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No4

Shevchenko A.V.,
Stability of political system: homo communicativus vs homo politicus. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5

 
 

Archive

   2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991