Democratization of the Russian Society:
Is Second Attempt Possible?
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Head of the Center for Comprehensive Social Studies, Institute of Sociology, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, firstname.lastname@example.org_id: 664339 |
The author applies to data of the monitoring sociological studies of the Institute of Sociology (Russian Academy of Sciences) in order to analyze the prospects for democratization of public and political life in Russia and to define presence / absence of the request for such democratization in public life. The author emphasizes that the prospects for democratic evolution of the Russian society is just one possible scenario among other variants of political transformation. This hypothesis is confirmed from one side by the emerging changes of public attitudes that are associated with actualization of the majority’s orientation on stability, as well as with the lack of changes in economic and political life of the state. From the other side this hypothesis is confirmed by the fact of absence of any clear value and institutional attitudes in the mass consciousness of Russian citizens (whereas one can see the skepticism of many citizens about first attempts of democratization of the state that took place in 1990-ies). The author pays special attention to some specific features of the democracy’s perception by Russian citizens that are in some cases different from its traditional doctrinal interpretations (it is, for example, the dominance of personalistic discourse over the institutional one) but does not consider that designing of any kind of special Russian model of democracy is possible and appropriate. The article also contains information about the factors that either contribute to democratization of social and political life or obstruct it. The author concludes that democratization of social and political life in Russia, alike the “democratic revolution of 1980-1990-ies” will be a process of changes, prolonged over time. Besides, as it is claimed in the text, this democratization process will be implemented under the pressure of civil society and will be focused on two main aims: firstly, on the formation of the mechanism of translation of diverse individual and group (primarily economic) interests into the language of universal problems, and, secondly, on the expansion of the space for implementation of such interests.
Buy a digital version in Polismag
Filatov N.N. The Determining Function of Russian Democracy Critique. – Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology. 2009. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 113-116. (In Russ.)
Foa R.S., Mounk Y. The Danger of Deconsolidation. – Kontrapunkt. 2017. No. 7. P. 1-11. URL: http://www.counter-point.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/foa_mounk_counterpoint7.pdf (accessed 05.08.2017).
Foa R.S., Mounk Y. The Signs of Deconsolidation. – Journal of Democracy. 2017. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 5-15.
Kornai Ya. Hungary: a 180-degree Turn. – Rigas Laiks. Russian edition. 2015. Autumn season. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.rigaslaiks.ru/zhurnal/vengriya-razvorot-na-180-gradusov-16674 (accessed 10.08.2017).
Krasin Yu.A. Metamorfozy rossiiskoi reformatsii. Politologicheskie syuzhety [Metamorphoses of the Russian Reformation. Political Stories]. M.: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2009. 496 p. (In Russ.)
Kuvaldin V. Vvedenie: vtoroe prishestvie kapitalizma v Rossiyu [Introduction: the Second Coming of Capitalism in Russia]. – Russia – 2010. Russian Transformation in the Context of World Development. Moscow: Logos. 2010. P. 13-24. (In Russ.)
Pastukhov V. The Revolution of Inequality. Global Social State Will Replace the Right Wave. – Republic. 07.02.2017. (In Russ.) URL: https://republic.ru/posts/79392 (accessed 10.08.2017).
Petukhov V.V. The Crisis Reality and Prospects of Political Transformation of the Russian Society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 5. P. 8-24 (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.05.02
Petukhov V.V., Petukhov R.V. Participatory Democracy: Institutional Crisis and New Prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 5. P. 25-48 (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.05.04
Peng Lu. Podderzhka demokratii sredi pokoleniya perioda perekhoda Kitaya k rynku: issledovanie studentov i vypusknikov elitnykh kitaiskikh universitetov [Support for Democracy Among the Generation of the China’s Transition to the Market: a Study of Students and Graduates of Elite Chinese Universities]. – Rossiya i Kitai: molodezh’ XXI veka [Russia and China: the Youth of the XXI Century]. Moscow: Novyj hronograf. 2014. P. 288-312. (In Russ.)
“Povestka dnya” sovremennoi Rossii i videnie ee perspektiv vedushchimi ekspertami strany [“Agenda” of Contemporary Russia and a Vision of Its Prospects by Leading Experts of the Country]. – Russian Society and the Time Challenges. The 5th book. Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov, V.V. Petukhov. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2017. P. 332-360. (In Russ.)
Przeworski А. Democracy and the Market. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Studies in Rationality and Social Change). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991. 228 p.
Urbinati N. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. (Russ ed.: Urbinati N. Iskazhennaya demokratiya. Mnenie, istina i narod. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo instituta Gaydara. 2016. 448 p.)
Wallerstein I. The End of the World As We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. (Russ. ed.: Wallerstein I. Konets znakomogo mira: Sotsiologiya XXI veka. Moscow: Logos. 2003. 368 p.)
Yasin E. Prizhivetsya li demokratiya v Rossii [Will Democracy Take Root in Russia]. Moscow: The Liberal Mission Foundation; New Literary Observer. 2012. 864 p. (In Russ.)
The generation of the «2000s»: ideological orientations and political participation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No4
Workshop of the Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences.,
Russian Identity in Sociological Dimension. Part II. (Particular features of Russians’ vital values and aspirations. Democratic values in the structure of Russians’ mass consciousness.). – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No2
Civil activity as alternative to the antidemocratic trend in the Russian politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5
The Russian Society’s Confidence in the Local Governments as a Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No6
Civil activity: institutional approach. Prospects for research. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No6