Between the State and the Nation:
Dilemmas of Identity Policy in Post-Soviet Societies


Semenenko I.S.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Centre for Comparative Socioeconomic and Political Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, isemenenko@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 251670 |

Lapkin V.V.,

Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Leading Researcher, Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, First Deputy Editor‑in‑Chief, Polis. Political Studies. Moscow, Russia, vvlh@politstudies.ru

elibrary_id: 43429 |

Bardin A.L.,

Reserarcher, Center for Comparative Socio-Economic and Political Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO). Moscow, Russia, andreybardin@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 684500 |

Pantin V.I.,

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Head of Department, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences; Principal Researcher, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, v.pantin@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 74145 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.05

For citation:

Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Bardin A.L., Pantin V.I. Between the State and the Nation: Dilemmas of Identity Policy in Post-Soviet Societies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No 5. P. 54-78 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.05.05



Abstract

Two closely related but essentially divergent political projects coexist on the post-Soviet states current political agenda: the formation of a modern civic nation and the consolidation of state institutions and national (nation-state) identity. The search for effective instruments to bridge the deep social and ethno-cultural cleavages their societies confront while promoting these projects brings identity issues to the forefront of political discourse. The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of identity politics strategies and practices pursued by political elites in three post-Soviet republics – Kazakhstan, Armenia and Belarus – cases that demonstrate a diversity of ethnic and cultural composition and of social and economic development resources. The research is based on in-depth interviews taken in research and expert institutions in these countries and is preceded by a critical overview of the concepts of the nation and nation-building in the post-Soviet context. The authors argue that there is a consistent divergence in the trajectories of the state and nation-building projects, and demonstrate that the potential of civic identity is often used to different ends in political and intellectual discourses. The political elites give a clear priority to the state-building agenda, while identity politics promoted by the state focus on the legitimization of the existing political regimes. An assessment of the prospects in post-Soviet societies for nation-building questions the universal appraisal of the “nation state” project in a transforming world order. 

Keywords
nation; nation-state; nation-building; nationalism; national identity; civic identity; identity politics; identity discourse; statehood; post-Soviet space; Kazakhstan; Armenia; Belarus.


   Buy a digital version in Polismag
References

Abashin S.N. Natsionalizmy v Srednei Azii: v poiskakh identichnosti [Nationalisms in the Central Asia: in Search for Identity]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya. 2007. 304 p. (In Russ.)

Beck U. The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology of the Second Age of Modernity. – The British Journal of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 79-105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00079.x

Berkutova E. Osnovnye kontury regional’noi politiki Respubliki Kazakhstan: strategicheskoe planirovanie, vlast’ i ekonomika [Basic Outlines of the Regional Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Strategic Planning, Power and Economics]. Astana – Almaty: The Institute of World Economy and Politics under the Foundation of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2015. 74 p. (In Russ.)

Brubaker R. Nationalizing States in the Old “New Europe” and the New. – Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1996. Vol. 19. P. 411-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1996.9993918

Brubaker R. Nationalizing States Revisited: Projects and Processes of Nationalization in Post-Soviet States. – Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2011. Vol. 34. No. 11. P. 1785-1814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141987 0.2011.579137

Brubaker R., Feischmidt M., Fox J., Grancea L. Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2008. 504 p.

Burkhanov A. Kazakhstan’s National Identity-Building Policy: Soviet Legacy, State Efforts and Societal Reactions. – Cornell International Law Journal Online. 2017. Vol. 50. No 1.

Chernilo D. Social Theory’s Methodological Nationalism. Myth and Reality. – European Journal of Social Theory. 2006. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 5-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006060460

Coppieters B., Emerson M., Huysseune M., Kovziridze T., Noutcheva G., Tocci N., Vahl M. Europeanization and Conflict Resolution. Case Studies from the European Periphery. Gent: Academia Press. 2004. 258 p.

Ethnic Conflict in Post-Soviet States. Ed. by L. Drobizheva, R. Gottemoeller, C. McArdle Kelleher, L. Walker. New York: M.E. Sharpe. 1996. 365 p.

Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Ed. by F. Barth. (Russ. ed.: Etnicheskie gruppy i sotsial’nye granitsy. Sotsial’naya organizatsiya kul’turnykh razlichii. Ed. by F. Barth. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. 2016. 198 p.)

Globalnaya perestroika [Global Perestroika]. Ed. by A.A. Dynkin, N.I. Ivanova. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2014. 528 p. (In Russ.)

Identichnost‘: lichnost‘, obshchestvo, politika. Otv. red. I.S. Semenenko [Identity: The Individual, Society and Politics. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko]. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2017. 964 с. (In print). (In Russ.)

Independence Generation. Youth Study 2016 – Armenia. Yerevan: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. 2016. 206 p.

Kuzio T. ‘Nationalising States’ or Nation-Building? A Critical Review of the Theoretical Literature and Empirical Evidence. – Nations and Nationalism. 2001. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 135-154. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00009

Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I. Crisis of the Ukrainian Statehood: Political and Legal, Valuable and Geoeconomic Aspects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No. 5. P. 68-89 (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.05.06

Letnyakov D.E. Nation-Building: Identity Policies in Post-Soviet States – Mir Rossii. 2016. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 144-167. (In Russ.)

Markedonov S.M. Holidays and Memorable Dates in Post-Soviet Transcaucasia: History and Politics]. – Neprikosnovennyi Zapas. 2015. Vol. 3. No. 101. P. 273-285. (In Russ.)

Mirumyan R. National Language as a Foundation of National Identity (Political-Philosophical Aspects)]. – Vestnik Rossiisko-Armyanskogo (Slavyanskogo) universiteta. 2016. No. 2. P. 47-62. (In Russ.)

Nation-Building and Identity in the Post-Soviet Space. New Tools and Approaches. Ed. by R. Isaacs, A. Polese. London and New York: Routledge. 2016. 258 p.

Nationalism and Identity Construction in Central Asia: Dimensions, Dynamics and Directions. Ed. by M. Omelicheva. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 2015. 198 p.

Nation-Building. Ed. by Deutsch K., Folz W. New York: Atherton Press. 1963. 167 р.

Naumenko L.I. Belorusskaya identichnost’. Soderzhanie. Dinamika. Sotsial’no-demograficheskaya i regional’naya spetsifika [Belorussian Identity. Content. Dynamics. Socio-Demographic and Regional Specifics]. Minsk: Belorusskaya nauka. 2012. 206 p. (In Russ.)

Ozkimirli U. Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010. 288 р.

Pawlusz E., Seliverstova O. Everyday Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet Space. Methodological Reflections. – Studies of Transition States and Societies. 2016. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 69-86.

Polese A. Language and Identity in Ukraine: Was It Really Nation-Building? – Studies of Transition States and Societies. 2011. Vol. 3. No. 3. P. 36-50.

Postsovetskie gosudarstva. Pod red. Zh. Radvani [Post-Soviet States. Ed. by J. Radvanyi]. Moscow: NOTA BENE. 2008. 288 p. (In Russ.)

Sargsyan H. Some Postulates of National Identity Research in the Context of Modern Social-Political and Cultural-Civilizational Transformations]. – Vestnik Rossiisko-Armyanskogo (Slavyanskogo) universiteta. 2016. No. 2. P. 42-26. (In Russ.)

Shaikemelev M.S. Kazakhskaya identichnost’. Pod obshchei red. Z.K. Shaukenovoi [The Kazakh Identity. Ed. by Z.K. Shaukenov]. Almaty: Institute for Philosophy, Political Science and Religion Studies of Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2013. 272 p. (In Russ.)

Shnirel’man V.A. Voiny pamyati: mify, identichnost’ i politika v Zakavkaz’e [Memory Wars: Myths, Identity and Politics in Transcaucasia]. Moscow: Akademkniga. 2003. 245 p. (In Russ.)

Simvolicheskaya politika. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Symbolic Politics. A Collection of Essays. Ed. by O.Yu. Malinova]. Issue 1. Konstruirovaniye predstavleniy o proshlom kak vlastnyi resurs [Constructing Perceptions of the Past as a Power Resource]. Moscow: INION RAN. 2012. 334 p. (In Russ.)

Smok V. Belarusian Identity: The Impact of Lukashenka’s Rule. Analytical Paper 3. 2013, 9 December. Minsk, London: Ostrogorski Centre. 2013. 22 p.

Soviet and Post-Soviet Identities. Ed. by M. Bassin, C. Kelly. Cambridge Ma, Cambridge University Press. 2012. 386 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894732

Tishkov V. Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in and After the Soviet Union: The Mind Aflame. London: Sage. 1997. 352 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279427

Tishkov V.A. Uslozhnyayushchee raznoobrazie: kak ego ponimat’ i uporyadochit’ [Increasing Diversity: How to Understand and Organize It]. – Kul’turnaya slozhnost’ sovremennykh natsii. Otv. red. V.A. Tishkov, E.I. Filippova [Cultural Complexity of Modern Nations. Ed. by V.A. Tishkov, E.I. Filippova]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 2016. P. 7-18. (In Russ.)

Zajak S. Cosmopolitan Sociology or Why the Global Is Local. – Governance Across Borders. Transnational Fields and Transversal Themes. Ed. by L. Dobusch, Ph. Mader, S. Quack. Berlin: epubli GmbH. 2013. P. 24-25. URL: http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_book/governance_across_borders_final.pdf

Zolyan S. On the Dynamic Approach to the Notion of National Identity (Armenian Identity Case Study). – SOTIS – sotsialnye tehnologhie, issledovaniya. 2017. No. 1. P. 11-17. (In Russ.) 

Content No 5, 2017

See also:


Semenenko I.S.,
Dilemmas of national identity: political risks and social inputs. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No6

Drobizheva L.M., Ryzhova S.V.,
Civic and Ethnic Identity and Perception of the Preferable State in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No5

Semenenko I.S.,
Nationalism, Separatism, and Democracy. New Patterns of National Identity in “Old” Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No5

Prokhorenko I.L.,
Ethnopolitical Conflict and Politics of Identity in Latin America. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4

Semenenko I.S.,
Identity Politics and Identities in Politics: Interethnic Perspectives in a European Context. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2002


Eisenstadt S.N.
The Paradox of Democratic Regimes: Fragility and Transformability (II).

 The article text (Электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991