Factors of Political Perception of Post-Soviet Countries in Contemporary Russian Society

Shestopal Ye.B.,

Head of the Department of Sociology and Psychology of Politics, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, shestop0505@rambler.ru

elibrary_id: 104409 |

Smulkina N.V.,

Junior Researcher, Department of Sociology and Psychology of Politics, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, smulkina@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 777440 | ORCID: 0000-0002-6691-5372 | RESEARCHER_ID: Q-9718-2017

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.01.03

For citation:

Shestopal Ye.B., Smulkina N.V. Factors of Political Perception of Post-Soviet Countries in Contemporary Russian Society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 1. P. 26-44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.01.03


This article discusses factors of political perception of post-Soviet countries on the basis of the recent study. Authors trace the influence of factors that determine images of post-Soviet countries in Russian society. Analysis of empirical data made it possible to identify the relevant objective, subjective, temporal, territorial, communicative, and cultural factors. Results of the study allow to conclude about varying degree of influence of individual factors on the rational and unconscious levels of perception. Object of perception had the most serious impact on the images of neighboring countries. Strong is the influence of political culture that contributes to the perception of post-Soviet countries as “we”. Socio- demographic factors differentiate in their influence on the images of post-Soviet countries: education and gender have low influence, while age is quite important. Psychological condition of our own society appeared to be one of the most important factors. In the images of Ukraine and Belarus the influence of mass media is strong, while in the images of Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, a great role is played by the historical and cultural factor and personal experience. The images of all neighboring countries have positive emotional characteristics. This is especially noticeable in those Russian regions that are close to the boundaries and in which respondents have personal experience of communicating with the peoples of these countries. 

political perception; country image; factors of political perception; post-Soviet states; political context; communicative factors; space (territorial); temporal factors; identity.


Alcock N.Z., Newcombe A.G. The Perception of National Power. – The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1970. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277001400304

Berendeev M.V. Kaliningraders Are Looking for Identity. – Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2007. No. 4. P. 127-132. (In Russ.)

Buzan B. People, States and Fear: an Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Bolder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. 1991. 393 p.

Byzov L., Petukhov V. Post-Soviet Space: Cultural and Social Ties. – The Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2008. Vol. 87. No. 3. P. 79-86. (In Russ.)

Caplan B. Rational Ignorance versus Rational Irrationality. – Kyklos. 2001. Vol. 54. No. 1. P. 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00138

Chernyshov Yu.G. Belarus and Kazakhstan: The Perception of Their Peoples and Political Leaders in Russia. – Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 175-179. (In Russ.)

Chernyshov Yu.G. Boundary Space as a Barrier Between Utopian and Real Images of Countries and Regions. – Dnevnik ASHPI. 2015. No. 33. P. 76-81. (In Russ.)

Gorshkov M., Petukhov V. Vneshnepoliticheskie orientatsii rossiyan v kontekste vyzovov sovremennoi global’noi politiki [Foreign Policy Orientations of Russians in the Context of the Challenges of Modern Global Politics]. – Politicheskaya nauka pered vyzovami global’nogo i regional’nogo razvitiya: nauchnoe izdanie. Pod red. O.V. Gaman-Golutvinoi [Political Science Before the Challenges of Global and Regional Development: A Scientific Publication. Ed. by O.V. Gaman-Golutvina]. Moscow: Aspect Press Publ. 2016. P. 606-634.

Gorshkov M. Russian Identity in the Sociological Dimension: An Analytical Report. 2007. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.isras.ru/analytical_report_Ident0.html (accessed 21.08.2017).

Granberg D., Kasmer J., Nanneman T. An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception. – Political Research Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298804100103

Konfisahor A.G., Medvedeva V.V. Conflicts as Geopolitical Processes: Psychological Analysis and Its Solving out Ways. – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12. 2011. No. 1. P. 36-42. (In Russ.)

Markedonov S. Putin’s Russia and CIS: Mission Without Purpose. – Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2006. No. 6. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.intelros.ru/index.php?newsid=285 (accessed 30.08.2017).

Mitrofanova S. The Image of the “Enemy Country” And “Friend Country” in the Representations of Modern Students of a Technical University. – Economics and Sociology. 2016. No. 2. P. 19-23. (In Russ.)

New Trends in Russian Political Mentality: Putin 3.0. Ed. by E.B. Shestopal. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. 2016. 414 p.

Ortmann S. Russian and post-Soviet Foreign and Security Policy. University of Sussex, Spring term 2009/2010. URL: https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=russian-and-post-soviet-for­eign-and-security-policy&site=12 (accessed 25.08.2017).

Petukhov V.V. Foreign Policy Priorities in the Consciousness of Contemporary Russians. – Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2010. No. 11. P. 4-13. (In Russ.)

Porshnev B.F. Social’naya psihologiya i istoriya [Social Psychology and History]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka. 1979. 235 p. (In Russ.)

Psihologiya politicheskogo vospriyatiya v sovremennoj Rossii. Pod red. E. Shestopal [The Psychology of Political Perception in Contemporary Russia. Ed. by E. Shestopal]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 2012. 432 p. (In Russ.)

Putin 3.0.: Obshchestvo i vlast’ v noveyshey istorii Rossii. Pod red. E.B. Shestopal [Putin 3.0.: Society and Authority in the Contemporary History of Russia. Ed. by E. Shestopal]. Moscow: ARGAMAK-MEDIA. 2015. 420 p. (In Russ.)

Results of CIS Activity for 10 Years and Tasks for the Future. – Diplomaticheskij vestnik. 2001. No. 12. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.mid.ru/integracionnye-struktury-prostranstva-sng/-/asset_publisher/rl7Fz­r0mbE6x/content/id/571396 (accessed 30.08.2017).

Romanova A.P. The image of “Alien” at the Post-Soviet space. – The Caspian region: Politics, Economics, Culture. 2016. No. 4. P. 159-166. (In Russ.)

Rossiya na novom perelome: strahi i trevogi. Pod red. M. Gorshkova, R. Krumma, V. Petukhova [Russia on a New Turn: Fears and Worries. Ed. by M. Gorshkov, R. Krumm, V. Petukhov]. Moscow: Al’fa Publ. 2009. 159 p. (In Russ.)

Smirnov A.A. The Country and the Image of Her Future: Methodological Aspect. – Strategic Priorities. 2015. No. 3. P. 34-43. (In Russ.)

Smirnova A.G. Studies of Threat Perception in International Relations: in Search for Theoretical. – Political Expertise: POLITEX. 2007. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 193-208. (In Russ.)

Zadorin I.V. Integratsionnye orientatsii naseleniya stran SNG: dinamika i perspektivy [Integration Reference Points of the CIS Population: Dynamic and Prospects]. – Integratsiya v Evrazii: sotsiologicheskoe izmerenie. Vyp. 2 [Integration in Eurasia: Sociological Dimension]. Moscow: INES. 2008. P. 61-89. (In Russ.)

Zamyatin D. Politico-Geographical Images of the Russian Space. – Acta Eurasica. 2003. No. 4. P. 34-45. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 1, 2018

See also:

Pishcheva T.N., Vinogradova N.S., Nedova A.D.,
The image of Russia through prisms of political communications. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4

Busygina I.M.,
On the Condition of the German Nation (The Territorial Factor in National Self-Consciousness of the Germans). – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No1

Shestopal Ye.B., Rogach N.N.,
Representations of an “Ideal” as a Factor of the Perception of a Political Leader in Reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No4

Evgenyeva T.V., Smulkina N.V., Tsymbal I.A.,
Russia’s Place in the World in the Perception of National Citizens: Identification Dimension. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No4

Zverev A.L., Palitay I.S., Smulkina N.V., Rogozar A.I.,
Specifics of Political Perception in Contemporary Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No3



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
1 2004

Lukin A.V.
Dictatorship and Life

 The article text


   2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991