“…And yet It Keeps Revolving”:
Reading Victor Kuvaldin’s “The Global World”

Pechatnov V.O.,

Head, Department of the countries of Europe and America, MGIMO-University, vopechatnov@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 251397 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.01.13
For citation:

Pechatnov V.O. “…And yet It Keeps Revolving”: Reading Victor Kuvaldin’s “The Global World”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 1. P. 184-191. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.01.13


The article explores some key problems and contradictions of globalization raised by a prominent political scientist and historian Victor Kuvaldin in his new book The Global World. Politics. Economics. Social Relations. The main attention is devoted to globalization’s “democratic deficit” and prospects of reforming the present world order to efficiently improve global governance. The contemporary neo-liberal globalization project sponsored by the West is facing serious challenges both at home and vis-a-vis other non-Western power centers. In order for globalization to successfully proceed without major upheavals in their respective countries, the Western elites have to make it more transparent and sustainable for their own populations and more inclusive for the rising new powers. 

Victor Kuvaldin; globalization; global governance; capitalism; democracy; integration.


Bernstein J., Wallach L. The New Rules of the Road: A Progressive Approach to Globalization. Petersen Institute of International Economics. October 13, 2016. URL: https://piie.com/events/new-rules-road-progressive-approach-globalization (accessed 03.12.2017).

Haass R. World Order 2.0. The Case for Sovereign Obligation. – Foreign Affairs. 2017. January/February. P. 2-9.

Hu F., Spence M. Why Globalization Stalled and How To Restart It. – Foreign Affairs. 2017. Vol. 96. No. 4. URL: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2017-06-13/why-globalization-stalled/ (accessed 03.12.2017).

Ikenberry J. Divided Nations: Why Global Governance Is Failing, and What We Can Do About It. – Foreign Affairs. 2016. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/divided-nations-why-global-governance-failing-and-what-we-can-do-about-it (accessed 03.12.2017).

Kuvaldin V. Global’nyi mir. Politika. Ekonomika. Sotsial’nye otnosheniya [The Global World. Policy. Economy. Social Relations]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publ. 2017. 400 p.

Lieven A. The New Nationalism. – The National Interest. 2017. July-August. P. 21-29.

Mazarr M. The Once and Future Order. – Foreign Affairs. 2017. January-February. P. 25-32.

Mead W. The Jacksonian Revolt. American Populism and the Liberal Order. – Foreign Affairs. 2017. March-April. P. 2-7.

Nye Jr., Joseph S. Will the Liberal Order Survive? The History of an Idea. – Foreign Affairs. 2017. Vol. 96. No. 1. January/February. P. 10-16.

Schlesinger A., Jr. The Cycles of American History. (Russ. ed.: Schlesinger A., Jr. Tsikly amerikanskoi istorii. Moscow: Progress Publ. 1992. 688 p.)

Zakaria F. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. (Russ. ed.: Zakaria F. Budysheye svobody: neoliberal’naya demokratia v SShA i za ikh predelami. Moscow: Ladomir Publ. 2004. 383 p.) 

Content No. 1, 2018

See also:

Oganisyan Yu.S.,
Socialism as the first stage of capitalism. Post-soviet Russia’s experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No3

Lapkin V.V.,
«Modernization» and «Capitalism»: rethinking contemporary political change. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6

Mushakoji K.,
Political and Cultural Background of Conflicts and Global Governance. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No3

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Fedotova V.G., Pantin I.K., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N., Sizemskaya I.N., , Korolev S.A., Oleynikov Ju.V., , Kanarsh G.Yu., Vlasova V.B., , , Kuznetsov D.A., Petrenko N.S., , , Verjaskina V.P.,
The changing sociality: outlines of the future. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No1

Rutland P.,
Russia and China: Saga of Two Transitions to Market Economy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
6 2017

Manoylo A.V.
Modern Political Conflicts: The Right for Interference

 The article text 


   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991