Foreign Aid and Quality of Governance:
Shattering Illusory Correlations


Bartenev V.I.,

Associate Professor, Department of International Organizations and World Political Processes, Director of Center for Security and Development Studies, School of World Politics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, vladimir.bartenev@fmp.msu.ru

elibrary_id: 627475 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.06.05

For citation:

Bartenev V.I. Foreign Aid and Quality of Governance: Shattering Illusory Correlations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No 6. P. 67-79 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.06.05



Abstract

This paper examines the current state of academic discourse on linkages between foreign aid and quality of governance in developing countries. The first section summarizes the arguments of the researchers who claim that foreign aid has a generally positive impact on the quality of institutional governance in the recipient countries. The second and third sections outline the counterarguments of scholars holding the opposite view. These counterarguments appeal either to general negative consequences of providing any resources in the form of foreign aid or to more specific risks related to certain aid modalities. Special attention is paid to explaining the cacophony of scholarly interpretations and to outlining the most promising trajectories for a future research. The conclusion is drawn that the ambivalence of empiric assessments stems not from the variations in data samples but from the methodological deficiencies generating illusory correlations. The willingness of most scholars to build abstract theoretical models of universal applicability raises serious concerns because of their inclination towards reductionism and the use of aggregated data on gross volumes of official development assistance. The latter factor leads to ignoring several parameters – first, substantial differences between aid types, instruments, modalities and channels; second, the flows of non-ODA military and security assistance which has been playing an increasingly important role in the international state-building efforts, and third, aid flows from emerging donors, particularly China, which neither report to the OECD DAC nor use policy conditionality. However, the methodological deficiencies should be eliminated not by oversaturating the quantitative models with extra variables and running complex regressions but by getting the most of qualitative case studies. Such studies should apply rather unusual – for reports commissioned by development agencies – methodology with making new theory-based hypotheses and examining assistance provided by different donors in several similar country contexts, while bringing together development scholars and area specialists with a deep knowledge of political systems and cultures in specific regions. 

Keywords
statehood; failed states; fragile states; state-building; states of fragility; resilience; securitydevelopment nexus..


   Buy a digital version in Polismag
References

Ahmed F.Z. The Perils of Unearned Foreign Income: Aid, Remittance and Government Survival. – American Political Science Review. 2012. Vol. 106. No. 1. P. 146-165. http://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000475

Alesina A., Weder B. Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid. – American Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 92. No. 4. P. 1126-1137. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344669

Apodaca C. Foreign Aid as Foreign Policy Tool. – Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.332

Boone P. Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid. – European Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 40. No. 2. P. 289-329. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00127-1

Bourgignon F., Gunning J.W. Foreign Aid and Governance: A Survey. Economic and Development Institutions. 2016. 55 p. URL: https://edi.opml.co.uk/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/EDI-PFPAPER-10-Bourguignon-and-Gunning.pdf (accessed 24.09.2018)

Brautigam D., Knack S. Foreign Aid, Institutions, and Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. – Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2004. Vol. 52. No. 2. P. 255-285. http://www.doi.org/10.1086/380592

Brazys S. Aid and Governance: Negative Returns? – European Journal of Development Research. 2015. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 294-313. http://www.doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.77

Collier P., Guillaumont P., Guillaumont S., Gunning J.W. Redesigning Conditionality. – World Development. 1997. Vol. 25. P. 1399-1407. http://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00053-3

Dietrich S. Bypass or Engage? Explaining Donor Delivery Tactics in Foreign Aid Allocation. – International Studies Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 57. No. 4. P. 698-712. http://www.doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12041

Dollar D., Pritchett L. Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1999. 160 p.

Dutta N., Leeson P.T., Williamson C.R. The Amplification Effect: Foreign Aid’s Impact on Political Institutions. – Kyklos. 2013. Vol. 66. No. 2. P. 208-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12018

Gisselquist R.M. Aid and Institution-Building in Fragile States: What do We Know? What Can Comparative Analysis Add? – The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2014. Vol. 656. P. 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214546991

Glazunova E.N. Theoretical Aspects of International Development Cooperation: Historical Retrospect. – Moscow University Journal of World Politics. 2013. No. 2. P. 126-146. (In Russ.)

Grävingholt J., Gänzle S., Ziaja S. Policy Brief: Concepts of Peacebuilding and State Building – How Compatible Are They? Berlin: German Development Institute. 2009. 12 p.

Hernandez D. Are “New” Donors Challenging World Bank Conditionality? – World Development. 2017. Vol. 96. No. 8. P. 529-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.035

Jones S., Tarp F. Does Foreign Aid Harm Political Institutions. – Journal of Development Economics. 2016. Vol. 118. P. 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.09.004

Knack S. Aid Dependence and the Quality of Governance: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2396. Washington, DC: World Bank. 2000. 44 p. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/200401468741328803/pdf/multi-page.pdf (accessed 17.09.2018).

Kuznetsov V.A. Strengthening Governance in the Middle East in the View of Theory of Social Orders. – Oriens. 2018. No. 3. P. 6-24. (In Russ.)

Lemay-Hebert N. Statebuilding without Nation-building? Legitimacy, State Failure and the Limits of the Institutionalist Approach. – Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 2009. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970802608159

McGillivray M., Morrissey O. Fiscal Effects of Aid. – Fiscal Policy for Development: Poverty, Reconstruction and Growth. Ed. by Addison T., Roe A. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan. 2004. 336 p.

Menkhaus K. State Failure and Ungoverned Space. – Adelphi Series. 2010. Vol. 50. No. 412-413: Ending Wars, Consolidating Peace: Economic Perspectives. P. 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19445571.2010.515155

Menochal A.R. State-Building for Peace: Navigating an Arena of Contradictions. London: Overseas Development Institute. 2009. 4 p.

Moss T., Pettersson G., van de Walle N. An Aid-Institutions Paradox? A Review Essay on Aid Dependency and State-Building in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development. 2006. 28 p.

Naumkin V.V. Deeply Divided Societies in the Middle East: Conflict, Violence, and Foreign Intervention. – Moscow University Journal of World Politics. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 66-96. (In Russ.)

Okada K., Samreth S. The Effect of Foreign Aid on Corruption. A Quantile Regression Approach. – Economics Letters. 2012. Vol. 115. P. 240-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.051

Political Economy of Statebuilding: Power after Peace. Ed. by Berdal M., Zum D. Milton: Taylor and Francis. 2017. 416 p.

Radelet S. Aid Effectiveness and the Millennium Development Goals. Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development. 2004. 34 p.

Steele A., Shapiro J.N. Subcontracting State-Building. – Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2017. Vol. 28. No. 4-5. P. 887-905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2017.1323408

Svensson J. Why Conditional Aid Does Not Work and What Can Be Done about It. – Journal of Development Economics. 2003. Vol. 70. No. 2. P. 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00102-5

Tavares J. Does Foreign Aid Corrupt? – Economics Letters. 2003. Vol. 79. No. 1. P. 99-106.

Teskey G. Capacity Development and State Builing: Issues, Evidence and Implications for DFID. London: Department for International Development. 2005. 23 p.

Xiaojun Li. Does Conditionality Still Work? China’s Development Assistance and Democracy in Africa. – Chinese Political Science Review. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0050-6

Content No 6, 2018

See also:


Kupryashin G.L.,
Governing through institutional changes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6

Nisnevich Yu.A., Khakhunova A.K.,
Methodology of Comparative Analysis and Classification of Public Administration Systems. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No4

Solovey V.D.,
The book on happiness and unhappiness of states. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5

Kolosov V.A.,
Primordialism and Modern National-State Building .. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No3

Pastukhov V.B.,
Prodrome of civil war. From «nomenclature» to «kleptoclature». – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No6

 
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991