Images of Russia:
Reflecting on the Eras of Change


Zarubina N.N.,

Professor, Professor of the Department for Sociology, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), n.zarubina@inno.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 649039 |

Noskova A.V.,

Professor, Professor of the Department for Sociology, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), a.noskova@inno.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 397796 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.02.13

For citation:

Zarubina N.N., Noskova A.V. Images of Russia: Reflecting on the Eras of Change. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No 2. P. 173-183 (In Russ.) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.02.13



   Buy a digital version in Polismag

Abstract

The article analyzes the empirical data of long-term monitoring studies presented in the collective monograph of scientists of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences “Twenty-Five Years of Social Transformations in the Assessments and Judgments of Russians: The Experience of Sociological Analysis”. The monograph presents rich and diverse data on the complex and sometimes contradictory image of Russia. On the basis of this data, the authors suggest the dichotomy of the collective memory of Russians: while the historic memory of Russians is variable and inconstant, their social memory as a means of reproducing sociocultural tradition in the mass consciousness is relatively stable. Historical memory in transforming societies serves both as the basis of solidarity and as a factor in the emergence of cleavages and conflicts due to contradictions in the understanding of significant events of the past. The authors state the uncertainty, blurring of the communicative, family and collective memory of the influence of the October Revolution of 1917 on the fate of individual families and society. The reasons for this are the lack of communication between generations, the lack of interest in the past and the lack of a pronounced ideological assessment of the results of the revolution. A positive attitude to the Soviet period is accompanied by a negative attitude to the revolution as a form of social development. Preferred are non-catastrophic forms of development, even if in fact they lead to stagnation. The tendency of positive evaluation of the Soviet period, which is consistently observed in Russian polls, is interpreted by the authors as a manifestation of the stability of social memory. The historical choice between models of a centralized communal and liberal state is conditioned by stable ideas about the need for state control over the main sectors of the economy and the priority of state rights and interests over individual ones. However, neither the historical nor the social memory of Russians represents shared ideals, value models and models of an optimal state structure. However, the people’s lack of a single vision of the ideal of a social structure can be viewed as protection against potential revolutions and a condition for creatively searching and building the country’s future through a dialogue of civil society with political power. 

Keywords
Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, social transformations, public opinion, historical memory of Russians, revolution, model of the state, social memory of Russians.


   Buy a digital version in Polismag
References

Berdyaev N.A. 1990. Sud’ba Rossii [The Fate of Russia]. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel’. 345 p. (In Russ.)

Dvadtsat’ pyat’ let sotsial’nykh transformatsii v otsenkakh i suzhdeniyakh rossiyan: opyt sotsiologicheskogo analiza. Pod red. M.K. Gorshkova, V.V. Petukhova [Twenty-Five Years of Russian Transformations: Experience of Sociological Analysis. Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov and V.V. Petukhov]. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2018. 384 p. (In Russ.)

Gusseynov A.A., Pantin I.K., Tretyakov V.T., Glinchikova A.G., Kara-Murza A.A., Fyodorova M.M., Alekseyeva T.A., Shubin A.V., Altvater E., Kagarlitzky B.Yu., Chizhkov S.L., Kudyukin P.M., Klyamkin I.M., Tzymbursky V.L., Sytin A.G., Pantin V.I, Vodolazov G.G. 2008. Democracy: Universal Values and Diversity of the Historical Experience (Materials of the Round Table of the Philosophy Institute of RAS, “Polis” and “Political Class” Journals). – Polis. Political Studies. No. 5. P. 55-73. (In Russ.)

Kirdina S.G. Institutsional’nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii: vvedenie v X-Y-teoriyu. 3-e izd. [Institutional Matrices and Development in Russia. An Introduction to X&Y Theory. 3d ed.]. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ. 2014. 468 p. (In Russ).

Mironov B.N. 2013. Russian Revolution of 1917 as a By-Product of Modernization. – Sociological Studies. No. 10. P. 29-39. (In Russ.)

Mironov B.N. 2018. Modernization of Russia in XVIII–XX Centuries as a Convergence Project. – Sociological Studies. No. 6. P. 91-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/s0132162518060089

Noskova A.V., Titova M.A., Vasil’ev A.A., Kishkin M.I. 2016. Out of family: “Foster Care System in Modern Russia. – Sociological Studies. No. 8. P. 54-64. (In Russ.)

Rossiya kak tsivilizatsiya: Materialy k razmyshleniyu. 2014. Pod red. O.I. Shkaratana, V.N. Leksina, G.A. Yastrebova [Russia as a Civilization: Readings for Reflections. Ed. by O.I. Shkaratan, V.N. Leksin, G.A. Yastrebov]. Moscow: Mir Rossii. 464 p. (In Russ.)

Sorokin P.A. 1992. Krizis nashego vremeni [The Crisis of Our Age]. – Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politicheskoi literatury Publishers. P. 427-504. (In Russ.)

Vasil’ev A.A. 2016. State and Law in the Minds of the Russian People. Notes and Reflections. – Bulletin of Saratov State Law Academy. No. 12. P. 57-62. (In Russ.) 

Content No 2, 2019

See also:


Korotetskaya L.V.,
Particular features of the intellectual patriotic discourse in Germany of the 1990s. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No1

Korotetskaya L.V.,
Sociology of the new time (on the new dictionary by S.A. Kravchenko). – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3

Popkov Yu.V.,
On archaization in social transformations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No1

Satarov G.A.,
Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No2

Latov Yu.V.,
Paradoxes of Memory of the Recent Past: USSR Under Brezhnev, Russia Under Yeltsin and Putin in Perception of the Current Generation of Russians. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
4 2003


Gelman V.Ya.
Institutional Construction and Informal Institutions in Modern Russian Politics

 The article text (электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991