Transregional Integration as a New Phenomenon of World Politics:
Nature and Prospects

Lebedeva M.M.,

Head of Department of World Politics, MGIMO University,

elibrary_id: 250953 | ORCID: 0000-0003-4162-0807 | RESEARCHER_ID: C-2309-2013

Kuznetsov D.A.,

Lecturer of Department of World Politics, Researcher of Centre for Comprehensive Chinese Studies and Regional Projects, MGIMO University,

elibrary_id: 844183 | ORCID: 0000-0001-6265-2774 | RESEARCHER_ID: V-2802-2018

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.05.06
For citation:

Lebedeva M.M., Kuznetsov D.A. Transregional Integration as a New Phenomenon of World Politics: Nature and Prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 5. P. 71-84. (In Russ.).

The reported study was funded by RFBR and EISR according to the research project № 19-011-31053 “Megatrends of World Politics in the 21st century: Manifestation and Development”.


The article discusses current trends related to the development of transregionalism in modern world politics. Deepening globalization, spreading integration practices and the trend of democratization – the three key megatrends of world development – provide an environment for increased transregional cooperation. The authors analyze the relationship between megatrends and transregionalism, the latter being considered as a specific type of international interaction which is developed at an intermediate level between the regional and the global levels of world politics. Transregionalism is triggered by the restructuring of political organizations around the world proceeding at three levels: namely political system on nation-states, the system of international relations, and the Westphalian system. New transregional initiatives are also fostered by the greater role of non-state actors, increased border transparency, and transformation of sovereignty due to intensifying transnational flows, the crisis of old international institutions, and the search for new growth stimuli by both national states and regional associations. The article singles out three key types of transregionalism: a) interregionalism, that embraces regional integration groups (EU-ASEAN, EU-MERCOSUR, etc.); b) transregional forums, comprised of individual states from different regions (BRICS, MIKTA, etc.); c) network transregionalism, as more complex ties including integration groups, individual states and groups of states (Belt and Road Initiative, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, etc.). The article highlights the functions of transregionalism and proposes a definition for it. The authors work out three scenarios for the development of transregionalism: 1) the scenario of “transregional chaos,” based on the highly competitive potential of transregional initiatives; 2) a scenario that considers trans-regionalism as a “stage of globalization”, and 3) a “transregional mosaic” that predicts formation of a network of overlapping transregional groups. 

transregionalism, integration, globalization, transnationalization, world political system, world politics, BRICS, Belt and Road Initiative, Trans-Pacific Partnership, MIKTA.


Aggarwal V., Fogarty E. 2004. Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Transregional and Interregional Trade Strategies. – European Union Trade Strategies: Between Globalism and Regionalism. London: Palgrave. 68 p. URL: European%20Union%20Trade%20Strategies.pdf (accessed 01.03.2019).

BRICS Academic Forum (7th). 2015. Ed. by Georgy Toloraya. Moscow: NCR BRICS.

China’s Belt and Road: a Game Changer? 2017. Ed. by Alessia Amighini. ISPI.

Hänngi H., Roloff R., Rüland J. 2006. Interregionalism and International Relations. London; New York: Routledge.

Horn H., Mavroidis P.C., Sapir A. 2010. Beyond the WTO? The Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements. – The World Economy. Vol. 33. No. 11. P. 1565-1588.

Katzenstein P.J. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Koldunova E. 2010. Next-Time, at ASEM! Theory and Practice of Interregional Relations: Russia, Take Note. – International Affairs, Special Issue: Russia and ASEAN. P. 23-28. URL: (accessed 01.03.2019).

Majluf L.A. 2004. Swimming in the Spaghetti Bowl: Challenges for Developing Countries under the “New Regionalism”. – Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities. Study Series No. 27. UNCTAD: New York. 34 p.

O’Brien R. 1992. Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs; Pinter Publishers.

Rajasree K.R. 2015. The Evolution of Transregional Cooperation: A Case Study of Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC). – Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. Vol. 5. No. 5. P. 287-299. URL: (accessed 01.03.2019)

Reiterer M. 2006. Interregionalism: a New Diplomatic Tool, the European Experience with East Asia. – European Foreign Affairs Review. No. 11. P. 223-243.

Ribeiro-Hoffmann A. 2016. Inter- and Transregionalism. – The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Ed. by T.A. Börzel and Th.Risse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Robertson J. 2017. Middle-Power Definitions: Confusion Reigns Supreme. – Australian Journal of International Affairs. No. 4. P. 335-370.

Roloff R. 2001. Europa, Amerika und Asien zwischen Globalisierung und Regionalisierung: Das interregionale Konzert und die ökonomische Dimension internationaler Politik. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

Rüland J. 2010. Balancers, Multilateral Utilities or Regional Identity Builders? International Relations and the Study of Interregionalism. – Journal of European Public Policy. No. 17. P. 1271-1283.

Söderbaum F., van Langenhove L. 2006. Introduction: The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism. – The EU as a Global Player: The Politics of Interregionalism. New York: Routledge. P. 1-14.

The Regional World Order. Transregionalism, Regional Integration, and Regional Projects across Europe and Asia. 2019. Ed. by A.D. Voskressenski, B. Koller. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield; Lexington Books.


Dahl R. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (Russ. ed.: Dahl R. Poliarkhiya: uchastiye i oppozitsiya. Moscow: HSE Publ. 2010).

Efremova K.A. From Regionalism to Transregionalism: Some Theoretical Conseptualisation of a New Reality. – Comparative Politics Russia. 2017. No. 8(2). P. 58-72. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsov D.A. Expert Discussions on Prospects and a Role of Transregional Projects in Eurasia: From Theory to Practical Implementation. – Comparative Politics Russia. 2017. No. 8(2). P. 163-171. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsov D.A. Transregionalism: Problems of Terminology and Conceptualization. – Comparative Politics Russia. 2016. No. 7. P. 14-24. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva M.M. 2016. System of Political Organization of the World: “Perfect Storm”. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. No. 2. P. 125-133. (In Russ.) URL: (accessed 01.03.2019)

Lebedeva M.M. 2012. Sovremennyye trendy mirovogo razvitiya: novoye kachestvo mira [Modern Trends of World Development: a New Quality of the World]. – Metamorfozy mirovoy politiki [Metamorphosis of World Politics]. Ed. by M.M. Lebedeva. Moscow: MGIMO. P. 9-32. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva M.M. 2019. Transformation of the Role of Cities and Domestic Regions in World Politics. – Ojkumena. Regional Researches. No 1. P. 7-16. (In Russ.)

Loginov Ye.L., Loginova V.Ye. 2016. The Trans-Pacific Partnership as the Basis for a Package of US Trade Agreements That Construct a New Outline of Macroeconomic Management. – Finansy i kredit. No. 5. P. 2-11. (In Russ.)

Megatrendy v mirovoy politike [Megatrends of World Politics]. 2019. Ed. by M.M. Lebedeva. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Mirovoye kompleksnoye regionovedeniye [World Comprehensive Regional Studies]. 2014. Ed. by A.D. Voskressenski. Moscow: Magistr; INFRA-M. (In Russ.)

Shlykov P.V. 2017. In Search for Transregional Alternatives in Eurasia: the Phenomenon of MIKTA. – Comparative Politics Russia. No. 8(4). P. 127-144. (In Russ.)

Stapran N.V., Kadochnikov P.A. Trans-Pacific Partnership: Implications and Risks for Russia. – APEC Bulletin. 2015. No. 2. P. 6-15. (In Russ.)

Voskressenski A.D., Koldunova Ye.V., Kireyeva A.A. Transregional and Regional Projects in the Context of “Post-Western” International Reality. – Comparative Politics Russia. 2017. No. 8(2). P. 37-57. (In Russ.)


Content No. 5, 2019

See also:

Lukin A.V.,
Russia and China in Greater Eurasia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No5

Korybko A., Morozov V.M.,
Pakistan’s Role In Russia’s Greater Eurasian Partnership. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No3

Alekseyeva T.A.,
Reflections on modern world politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Voskressenski A.D.,
Type of socio-political access within a society and the space of the world politics (historical evolution of the world system). – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Lebedeva M.M.,
The World Politics: Tendencies of the Development. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No4



   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991