Trust in Unstable Russian Society
First Deputy Director of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Head of the Center for Longitudinal Studies at the Institute for Social Policy of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, firstname.lastname@example.org_id: 346897 | ORCID: 0000-0002-3034-8521 | RESEARCHER_ID: F-2538-2014
Senior researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, email@example.com_id: 678594 | ORCID: 0000-0001-7078-6203 |
The article uses the results of projects carried out as part of the NRU HSE Basic Research Program. It is a continuation of the previous publication of the same authors: Kozyreva P.M., Smirnov A.I. Business and the Population: A Lack of Trust – Reasons and Consequences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 1. P. 53-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.01.06
Buy a digital version in Polismag
This article is focused on analyzing dynamics of levels and issues of developing trust within modern Russian society, based on data from the RLMS-HSE. The main objective was evaluating peculiarities in the formation and distribution of generalized trust, which have been observed throughout the last decade of crisis. While performing the analysis, certain new positive shifts were revealed in levels of generalized trust, which have been observed within various socio-demographic groups, despite an increase in uncertainty in all areas of social life. The authors emphasize factors which contribute to and hinder the spread of trust. It is stressed that the most critical factor which contributes to Russian people’s increasing trust towards others is an increased sense of personal security. Analyzing a vast range of empirical data leads to the belief that generalized trust appears to be the most important condition necessary for consolidating the foundations of democratic life and further developing civil society. However, participating in the activities of democratic institutions and voluntary organizations of civil society do not necessarily become a source of increased trust towards other people.
Buy a digital version in Polismag
Bahry D., Kosolapov M., Kozyreva P., Wilson R. 2005. Ethnicity and Trust: Evidence from Russia. – American Political Science Review. Vol. 99. No. 4. P. 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051853
Charron N., Rothstein B. 2016. Does Education Lead to Higher Generalized Trust? The Importance of Quality of Government. – International Journal of Educational Development. Vol. 50. P. 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijedudev.2016.05.009
Coleman J. 1988. Social Capital in The Creation of Human Capital. – American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 94. P. 95-120.
Delhey J., Newton K. 2003. Who Trusts? The Origins of Social Trust in Seven Nations. – European Societies. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 93-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000072256
Helliwell J.F., Putnam R.D. 2004. The Social Context of Well-Being. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Vol. 359. No. 1449. P. 1435-1446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522
Inglehart R., Welzel Ch. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000072256
Newton K. 2012. Taking a Bet with Ourselves Can We Put Trust in Trust? – WZB Mitteilungen Heft 135. März. P. 6-8. URL: http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/artikel/2012/f-17059.pdf (accessed: 27.06.2019).
Uslaner E. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nishikawa L., Stolle D. 2012. Do Not Trust Strangers: How Parents Shape the Generalized Trust of Their Children. –Trust: Comparative Perspectives. Ed. by M. Sasaki, R. Marsh. Leiden: Brill. P. 133-171. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004221383_007
Alekseeva A.Ju. 2007. Confidence, Social and Interpersonal Trust: Criterions of Differentiation. – Human. Community. Management. No. 4. P. 4-20. (In Russ.)
Almakaeva A.M. 2014. Measuring Generalized Trust in Cross-Cultural Studies. – Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11. P. 32-43. (In Russ.)
Bauman Z. 2005. The Individualized Society (Russ. ed.: Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. Moscow: Logos).
Gudkov L. 2012. Trust in Russia: Meaning, Functions, and Structure. – The Russian Public Opinion Herald. No. 2(112). P. 8-47. (In Russ.)
Guzhavina T. A. 2012. Social Trust in Civil Society. – Problems of Territory’s Development. No. 6 (62). P. 115-122. (In Russ.)
Fukuyama F. 2004. Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (Russ. еd.: Fukuyama F. Doverie: social’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k procvetaniju. Moscow: AST; Ermak).
Kertman G.L., Patrushev S.V. 2013. Doverie: obshchee i chastnoe [Trust: Public and Private]. – Grazhdanskoe i politicheskoe v rossijskih obwestvennyh praktikah. Moscow: ROSSPEN. P. 31-40. (In Russ.)
Kozyreva P.M. 2011. Doverie i ego rol` v sovremennoj Rossii [Trust and Its Role in Modern Russia]. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
Luman N. 2007. Social Systems. Essay on a General Theory (Russ. ed.: Luman N. Sotsial’nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchei teorii. Moscow: Nauka).
Mersianova I.V., Korneeva I.E. 2017. The Impact of Trust on Russians’ Participation in Charities. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 2. P. 145-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2017.2.09
Putnam R. 1996. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Russ. ed.: Putnam R. Chtoby demokratiya srabotala. Grazhdanskie traditsii v sovremennoi Italii. Moscow: Ad Marginem).
Satarov G.A. 2016. Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part I. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 1. P. 121-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.01.09
Simmel G. 2002. How is society possible? (Russ. ed.: Simmel G. Kak vozmozhno obshhestvo? – Teoreticheskaya sociologiya: Antologiya. Ch. 1. Moscow: Universitet. P. 315-334).
Tennis F. 2002. Community and Society (Russ. ed.: Tennis F. Obshhnost` i obshhestvo. – Teoreticheskaya sociologiya: Antologiya. Ch. 1. Moscow: Universitet. P. 216-248).
Zubok Ju.A., Chuprov V.I. 2016. Trust in the Process of Self-Regulation of Social Interactions of the Youth and the Changing Social Reality. – Problems of Territory’s Development. No. 5 (85). P. 29-37. (In Russ.)
Demand for civil virtue. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5
Demography factor of the «social state» evolution in Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6
Enforceable Trust in the World of Social Networks. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No2
Selezneva A.V., Rogozar-Kolpakova I.I., Filistovich Ye.S., Trofimova V.V., Dobrynina Ye.P., Streletz I.E.,
Russian political elite: analysis from the perspective of the human capital concept. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4
Grinin L.Ye., Korotaev A.V.,
Urbanization and Political Instability: to the Development of Mathematical Models of Political Processes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No4