.jpg)
printGreater Eurasia:
In Search of a Legal Order
Butler W.E.,
John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law, Dickinson School of Law, Pennsylvania State University; Emeritus Professor of Comparative Law, University College London, web15@psu.edu
Entin M.L.,
Professor, Head of Department of European Law, MGIMO University, entinmark@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 540593 | ORCID: 0000-0001-9562-8340 | RESEARCHER_ID: DVS-0499-2022
Entina E.G.,
Associate Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences, e.entina@hse.ru
elibrary_id: 802154 | ORCID: 0000-0003-4198-4870 | RESEARCHER_ID: M-6192-2015
Torkunova E.A.,
Associate Professor, MGIMO University, etorkunova@hotmail.com
elibrary_id: 453284 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.04.02
For citation:
Butler W.E., Entin M.L., Entina E.G., Torkunova E.A. Greater Eurasia: In Search of a Legal Order. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 4. P. 9-23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.02
Abstract
The correlation of national, supranational, trans-regional, and internationallegal systems is a concern of comparative legal (including their political science andinternational relations aspects) studies because it has decisive influence on how Statesposition themselves within the family of nations, perceive themselves in the surroundingworld community, and build relations with other nations, international organizations,and the international community as a whole. At the same time, the correlation hasimmense pragmatic significance, for it is the essential basis for determining which of themulti-level management legal systems operates and/or prevails when the rules bindingon individuals, societies, businesses, civil services, international organizations, andinterstate communities are formed within or outside of national jurisdictions. Study ofthis correlation is of particular importance in the context of the growing complexity ofthe international legal field and multilevel management systems, as well as in the lightof current trends in the development of international economic and political processes.On the one hand, the growing international confrontation and misuse of internationallegal instruments are forcing States to take measures to protect their internal law systems.On the other hand, the need to build harmonious international cooperation requiresthem to open their legal systems to some extent. The article discusses the experience ofvarious integration structures in this context. The authors claim that the project of theGreater Eurasia has the advantage of sharing a common Soviet legal heritage, whichalready establishes a common legal language and cohesive terminology – factors thathave, for example, restrained EU integration efforts. Whatever the CIS may or may nothave achieved, meeting expectations or otherwise, it represents nearly three decades of integration experience.
Keywords
Russia, U.S., China, Japan, European Union, Greater Eurasia, EAEU, CIS, multilevel legal systems, integration, law reform.
References
Butler W.E. 1980. International Law in Comparative Perspective. Springer. 324 p.
Butler W.E. 1996. Law Reform in the CIS. – Sudebnik. No. 1. P. 9-32.
Butler W.E. 2013. Russian Public Law: The Foundations of a Rule-Of-Law State: Legislation and Documents. 3rd UK ed. London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.
Entin M.L., Entina E.G., Osokina E.B. 2019. A Balanced Approach to the Protection of National Law and Order and the European Court of Human Rights. – The Journal of Comparative Law. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 275-300.
Fourth Report on Peremptory norms of General International Law (jus cogens), prepared by Special Rapporteur Dire Tladi. International Law Commission. Seventy-first session Geneva, April 29 – June 7 and July 8 – August 9, 2019. UN General Assembly. A/CN.4/727. URL: https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=ru/A/CN.4/727 (accessed 26.02.2020).
Lind J. 2019. The Rise of China and the Future of the Transatlantic Relationship. Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs. 29.07.2019. URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/rise-china-and-future-transatlantic-relationship?utm_source=Chatham%20House&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=10769248_CH%20Newsletter%20-%2002.08.2019&utm_content=China-Title&dm_i=1S3M,6ETLS,PGH1RS,PE95L,1 (accessed 26.02.2020).
Mitter R. 2019. How the One-Party State May Shape Our Future. Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs. URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/twt/how-oneparty-state-may-shape-our-future?utm_source=Chatham%20House&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=10769248_CH%20Newsletter%20-%2002.08.2019&utm_content=TWT-Title&dm_i=1S3M,6ETLS,PGH1RS,PE95L,1 (accessed 26.02.2020).
Butler W.E. 2011. Eurasian Economic Space – Laboratory of Comparative Law. – Eurasian Law Journal. No. 7. P. 6-9. (In Russ.)
Entin M.L. 1987. Sud evropeiskikh soobshchestv: pravovye formy obespecheniya zapadnoevropeiskoi integratsii [Court of Justice of the European Communities: Legal Forms for Ensuring Western European Integration]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russ.)
Entin M.L., Entina E.G., Torkunova E.A. 2019. Modern Requirements for the National Legal System. – Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. No. 2. P. 11-24. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/art.2019.2.2
Evropeiskoe pravo. Osnovy integratsionnogo prava Evropeiskogo soyuza i Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [European Law. Fundamentals of integration law of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union]. 2018. Ed. by L.M. Entin, M.L. Entin. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M. 528 p. (In Russ.)
Galushko D.V. 2018. Vzaimodeistvie prava Evropeiskogo soyuza s pravom gosudarstv-chlenov i tret’ikh stran [The Interaction of European Union Law with the Law of Member States and Third Countries]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publishing House. (In Russ.)
K Velikomu okeanu: khronika povorota na Vostok. Sbornik dokladov Valdaiskogo kluba [To the Great Ocean: a Chronicle of a Turn to the East. Collection of Reports of the Valdai Club]. Moscow: BOSLEN. (In Russ.)
Sazonova K.L. 2014. Obligations erga omnes and Norms jus cogens in International Law: Conceptualization and Law Enforcement Practice. – State and Law. No. 11. P. 72-79. (In Russ.)
Tolstykh V.L. 2018. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava [International Law Course]. Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russ.)
Content No. 4, 2020
See also:
Inozemtzev V.L.,
Eurasian economic union: lost in the middle of nowhere. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No6
Lukin A.V.,
Russia and China in Greater Eurasia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No5
Rutland P.,
Russia and China: Saga of Two Transitions to Market Economy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Streltsov D.V., Chugrov S.V., Karelova L.B., Oznobishchev S.K.,
Russia and Japan. Part II. View from Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1
Korybko A., Morozov V.M.,
Pakistan’s Role In Russia’s Greater Eurasian Partnership. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No3
.jpg)
.jpg)