Secularization and Religiousness in the Optics of Constructivism

Sardaryan G.T.,

Dean at School of governance and politics, MGIMO University, sardaryan.mgimo@gmail.com

elibrary_id: 755856 | ORCID: 0000-0001-8515-4321 | RESEARCHER_ID: P-9791-2017

Alekseyeva T.A.,

Professor, Head of Political Theory Department, MGIMO University, ataleks@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 1361 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.04.09

Rubric: Theory and Methodology of Political Studies

For citation:

Sardaryan G.T., Alekseyeva T.A. Secularization and Religiousness in the Optics of Constructivism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 4. P. 124-138. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.09

Abstract

In the presentation of scientific literature in this field, modernization is, almost as an axiom, invariably accompanied by a loss of religiosity and the spread of secularism. However, the situation is not so simple and unambiguous. In the modern world, there are distinct trends that demonstrate both the erosion of secularism, and an increase of interest in religion, seen across a spectrum of ways, from fundamentalism to new trends and beliefs. In other words, political ideologies are yet to offer an unambiguous replacement for religious views. According to the authors, the interpretation and practice of religions is largely determined by the political culture of specific societies, their identity, historical mythology, traditions of societies, and so on; political culture, in turn, becomes a recipient of the latest versions of religious and secular views. In other words, context is crucial. Therefore, the European model is not at all universal. According to the authors, constructivism is an approach that allows the limits of Eurocentrism to be breached; significantly, Eurocentrism remains the typical attitude in many modern studies whose focus is only on statistical data, but does not connect with what is happening amidst the political culture of the respective countries and regions.

Keywords

secularity, secularization, constructivism, religion, political culture.

Full Text

References

Barnett M. 2001. Empire of Humanity. A History of Humanitarianism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Berger P. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City: Doubleday.

Berger P. 2014. The Many Alters of Modernity: Toward a Paradigm for Religion in a Pluralist Age. Boston: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.

Burgess-Jackson K. 2018. Rethinking the Presumption of Atheism. – International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Vol. 84. No. 1. P. 93-111.

Cameron C.D., Payne B.K., Sinnott-Armstrong W., Scheffer J.A., Inzlicht M. 2017. Implicit Moral Evaluations: A Multinomial Modeling Approach. – Cognition. Vol. 158. P. 224-241.

Campanini M. 2015. “Science and Epistemology in Medieval Islam. – Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. Vol. 4. No.12. P. 20-28.

Eisenstadt S.N. 2000. Multiple Modernities. – Daedalus. Vol. 129. No. 1. P. 1-29.

Fleming C.T. 2018. Critical Legal Studies and Narrative Ethics in Contemporary Indian ‘Epic’ Fiction. – South Asian Studies. Vol. 34. No. 1. P. 81-92.

Glei R., Reichmuth S. 2012. Religion between last Judgement, law and Faith: Koranic Dīn and its Rendering in Latin Translations of the Koran. – Religion. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 247-271.

Hurd E.Sh. 2008. Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton.

Hurd E.Sh. 2015. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: Princeton university Press.

Hurd E.Sh. 2017. Narratives of De-secularization in International Relations. – Intellectual History Review. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2016.1255462

Kramer G. 1993. Islamist Notions of Democracy. Middle East Report, July-August. URL: https://merip.org/1993/07/islamist-notions-of-democracy/ (accessed 30.05.2020).

Kuroda T. 1996. The Imperial Law and the Buddhist Law. – Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. Vol. 23. No. 3-4. P. 271-285.

Łukasiewicz D. 2018. Epistemic Deism and Probabilistic Theism. – European Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 129-140.

Nongbri B. 2013. Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Norris P., Inglehart R. 2011. Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Rawls J. 1998. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harbard University Press.

Rosa L. 2019. Logical Principles of Agnosticism. – Erkenntnis. Vol. 84. No. 6. P. 1263-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0007-7

Sheikh M.K. 2018. Recursion or Rejection? Securitization Theory Faces Islamist Violence and Foreign Religions. – Global Discourse. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 26-38.

Shipovalova L. 2017. Should We Conceive Science Historically? – Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 18-28.

The Desecularization of the World. 1999. Ed. by P. Berger. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdman’s.

Walker H.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walton H. 2018. We Have Never Been Theologians: Postsecularism and Practical Theology. – Practical Theology. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 218-230.

Wiorda H. 2016. Political Culture, Political Science, and Identity Politics. An Uneasy Alliance. London: Routledge.

Zeitlin S. 1938. The Jews: Race, Nation, or Religion? – Biblica. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 105-107.

Baranovsky V.G., Naumkin V.V. 2018. World of Faith and World of Disbelief: Expansion and Reduction of Religiosity. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 6. P. 8-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.06.02

Weber M. 1990. Die protestantische Ethik und der “Geist” des Kapitalismus (Russ. ed.:

Weber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow: Progress).

Identichnost: Lichnost, obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie [Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia]. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko. 2017. Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russ.)

Casanova J. 2018. Exploring the Postsecular. Three Meanings of “the Secular” and Their Possible Transcendence. – Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 143-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2018-36-4-143-174

Chugrov S.V. 2017. Post-Truth: Transformation of Political Reality or Self-Destruction of Liberal Democracy? – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 42-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.04

Corm G. 2012. La question religieuse au XXIe siecle: geopolitique et crise de la post-modernite. (Russ. ed.: Corm G. Religioznyi vopros v XXI veke. Geopolitika i krizis postmoderna. Moscow: Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovanii).

Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. 2002. (Russ. ed.: Kul’tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu. Ed. by L. Harrison, S. Huntington. Moscow: Moscow School of Political Studies).

Ferro M. 2010. Comment on raconte l’histoire aux enfants: a travers le monde entire. (Russ. ed.: Ferro M. Kak rasskazyvayut istoriyu detyam v raznykh stranakh mira. Moscow: Knizhnyi klub 36.6).

Habermas J. 2008. A “Post-secular” Society – What Does That Mean? (Russ. ed.: Habermas J. Protiv “voinstvuyushchego ateizma”. “Postsekulyarnoe” obshchestvo – chto eto takoe? – Russian Journal. URL: http://www.russ.ru/pole/Protiv-voinstvuyuschego-ateizma#1 (accessed 28.05.2020)).

Harrison L. 2012. Jews, Confucians, and Protestants. Cultural Capital and The End of Multiculturalism. (Russ. ed.: Harrison L. Evrei, konfuciancy i protestanty. Kul’turnyj kapital i konec mul’tikul’turalizma. Moscow: Fund Liberal mission).

Kimelev Yu.A. 1998. Filosofiya religii. Sistematicheskij ocherk [The Philosophy of Religion. Systematic Review]. Moscow: Nota Bene. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva M.M., Harkevich M.V. 2016. Theory of International Relations in The Mirror of Contemporary Russian International Studies. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. No. 5. P. 7-19. (In Russ.)

Luther M. 1994. An den christlichen Adel deutscher Nation. (Russ. ed.: Luther M. K khristianskomu dvoryanstvu nemetskoi natsii. – Luther M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. St. Petersburg: Andreev i soglasie. P. 55-119).

Marx K. 1955. Zur Judenfrage. (Russ. ed.: Marx K., Engels F. K evrejskomu voprosu. – Sochineniya. Vol. 1. Moscow: Gos. izd-vo politicheskoj literatury. P. 382-413).

Content No. 4, 2020