Amendments to Russian Constitution and International Institutions Decisions:
EAEU Prospective


Verlaine M.,

Ph.D. in Economics and Management (Ecole nationale des Arts et Métiers, ENSAM, Paris), Associate Professor, Economics and Finance Department, ICN Business School, michel.verlaine@icn-artem.com

ORCID: 0000-0001-6269-5336 |

Shashkova A.V.,

Professor, Constitutional Law Department, MGIMO University, a.shashkova@inno.mgimo.ru

elibrary_id: 479023 |

Kudryashova E.V.,

LLM – King’s College London, Dr. Sci. (Law), Leading Researcher, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of Russian Federation, ev_kudryashova@inbox.ru

elibrary_id: 358757 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.05.12
For citation:

Verlaine M., Shashkova A.V., Kudryashova E.V. Amendments to Russian Constitution and International Institutions Decisions: EAEU Prospective. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 5. P. 164-176. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.05.12



   Buy a digital version in Polismag

Abstract

The constitutional reforms in Russia are amongst the most significant news for Russia’s partners in international relations. The configuration of international law and Russian domestic legal order falls within the scope of the constitutional changes of 2020, and there is no chance that this change will be abandoned by the legislator. This particular amendment was not actively commented on during the nationwide discussion on the constitutional reform; it drew mostly experts’ attention. The article alleges that the constitutional amendment restricting the applicability of international case law in Russia is both a transient response to the instant political tension around Russia, and a formalization of the positivistic trend well established in domestic judicial practice. The positivistic trend is part of the process shaping Russia’s own approach to international law. The prospective amendment concerning international case law in the Constitution of the Russian Federation will not hinder the rules expressly stated in the treaties of the EAEU. However, the resolutions of the EAEU’s structures and institutions, including the case law of the Court of the EAEU, are likely to be scrutinized in a defensive way by Russian Constitutional court in situations extraordinary for the Russian State, ensuring their conformity with the unquestionable and unconditional supremacy of the Russian Constitution. 

Keywords
EAEU, international law, international case law, constitutionalism, constitution of Russia, Eurasian integration.


   Buy a digital version in Polismag
References

Abashidze A.Kh., Ilyashevich M.V., Solntsev A.M. 2017. Anchugov & Gladkov v. Russia. – American Journal of International Law. Vol. 111. No. 2. P. 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.31

Chimni B.S. 2006. Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto. – International Community Law Review. No. 8. P. 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1163/187197306779173220

Chirkin V.E. 2016 International, Supranational (Supra-Statal) and Constitutional Law: the dialectic of Comparative Interaction. – Journal of Comparative Law. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 124-135.

Crawford J. 2014. Chance, Order, Change: the course of international law. General Course on Public International Law.

Damrosch L.F. 1991. International Human Rights Law in Soviet and American Courts. – The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 100. No. 8. P. 2315-2334. https://doi.org/10.2307/796895

Diyachenko E., Entin K. 2017. The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: Challenges and Perspectives. – Russian Law Journal. Vol. 5 No. 2. P. 53-74. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-2-53-74

Entin M.L., Entina E.G. 2017. The Impact of Human Rights Law on the Progressive Development of Contemporary International Law. Part I. – Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 2. P. 29-44.

Hanqin X. 2011. Chinese Contemporary Perspective on International Law: History, Culture and International Law. The Hague Academy of international law Collected Courses. Vol. 355 P. 41-234

Kalinichenko P. 2018. The constitutional order of the Russian Federation and its adaptability to European and Eurasian integration project. – Post-Soviet Constitutions and Challenges of Regional Integration. Adapting to European and Eurasian Integration Projects. Ed. by Petrov R., Van Elsuwege P. London: Routledge. P. 168-177. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-107-133

Kalinichenko P., Petrov R., Karliuk M. 2019. International Law in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus: Modern Integration Project. – Russian Law Journal. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 107-133.

Koroteev K., Golubok S. 2007. Judgement of the Russian Constitutional Court on Supervisory Review in Civil Proceedings: Denial Justice, Denial of Europe. – Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 619-632. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngm018

Malksoo L. 2015. Russian Approaches to International law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Orlova A.V. 2018. Sovereignty, Dissent, and the Shaping of International Consensus Around Human Rights: An Examination of Russian Disengagement from the European Court of Human Rights. – Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 435-468.

Oxman H.B. 2010. Idealism and the Study of International Law. Inaugural Lecture. Public International Law Session. Brill.

Shashkova A.V., Polovchenko K.A., Volevodz A.G. 2019. Questioning State Corporations as Special Forms of Legal Entities. – International Journal of Economics & Business Administration. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 186-203. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/263

Shashkova A., Verlaine M., Kudryashova E. 2020. On Modif ications to the Constitution

of the Russian Federation in 2020. – Russian Law Journal. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 60-83. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2020-8-1-60-83

Shokhin S., Kudryashova E. 2019. Macroeconomic Coordination in the Eurasian Economic Union: Strategic Aspects. – Russian Law Journal. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 38-52. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-38-52

 

Chernichenko S.V. 2018. The European Court on Human Rights: The Problem of Unenforceable Judgements. – Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 3. P. 6-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-3-6-17 

Content No. 5, 2020

See also:


Troitskaya O.V.,
Right of Nations to Self-Determination: Evolution of Concept and Practices. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No6

Pastukhov V.B.,
The demon of law. Russian law as escaping reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Chabot J.-L.,
Constitution and Constitutionalism (Analysis of the Terms). – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6

Habermas J.,
Religion, law and politics. – On political justice in a multicultural World-Society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2

Pastukhov V.B.,
At the constitutional threshold. challenges and answers of the russian constitutionalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No1

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2007


Sanglibayev A.A.
Ethno-Clanship Relations on Post-Soviet Space

  Полный текст
 

Archive

   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991