Transnational Policy Networks and Change Through Internationalization (The Record of Project 5-100)

Transnational Policy Networks and Change Through Internationalization (The Record of Project 5-100)

Crowley-Vigneau A.,

Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 1090824 |

Istomin I.A.,

Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 333124 | ORCID: 0000-0002-8334-6343 | RESEARCHER_ID: A-8494-2017

Baykov A.A.,

Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 621264 |

Kalyuzhnova Y.,

Henley Business School, Reading, UK,

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.05.02

For citation:

Crowley-Vigneau A., Istomin I.A., Baykov A.A., Kalyuzhnova Y. Transnational Policy Networks and Change Through Internationalization (The Record of Project 5-100). – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 5. P. 8-24. (In Russ.).


This article considers the ideational and political contexts in which Project 5-100, the Russian excellence in higher education initiative emerged, as well as the specificities of its organisational and behavioural model. While Project 5-100 has been studied in the academic literature as regards its efficiency and how it affected the performance and inner workings of the participating universities, the question of how the project came about and the characteristic traits of its internal set-up still remain largely overlooked. The study focuses on the involvement of local and international players, arguing that their successful and organic cooperation influenced both the architecture and the implementation of the project. This paper contributes to the literature on policy networks by showing that transnational actors do not necessarily undermine or challenge state power and can on the contrary help governments implement systemic change. Inspired by the international experience of establishing world-class universities, Project 5-100 was conceived and lobbied by a small but influential group of visionaries pushing for change who – acting in a concerted and purposive manner – acquired a novel and powerful capacity to use international expertise for the development of a key national project, capable of deeply transforming the country’s higher educational system.


Russia, Project 5-100, higher education, internationalization, Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs), Transnational Expertise and Experience Networks (TEENs).


Adam S., Kriesi H. 2007. The Network Approach. – Theories of the Policy Process. Ed. by P. Sabatier. Oxon: Routledge. P. 129-154.

Agasisti T., Shibanova E., Platonova D., Lisyutkin M. 2018. The Russian Excellence Initiative for Higher Education: an Econometric Evaluation of Short-Term Results. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 201/EC/2018.

Altbach P.G., Salmi J. 2011. The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Clas Research Universities. Direction in Development; Human Development. World Bank.

Bevir M. 2009. Key Concepts in Governance. London: Sage. 218 p.

Börzel T.A. 1998. Organizing Babylon — On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks. – Public Administration. Vol. 76. No. 2. P. 253-273.

Crowley-Vigneau A., Baykov A., Kalyuzhnova Y. 2020. Implementation of International Norms in Russia: The Case of Higher Education. – Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 29. No. 8/9. P. 39-54.

Enroth H. 2011. Policy Network Theory. – The Sage Handbook of Governance. London: Sage. P. 19-35.

Eschle C. 2001. Globalizing Civil Society? Social Movements and the Challenge of Global Politics from Below. – Globalization and Social Movements. London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 61-85.

Finnemore M. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 154 p.

Finnemore M., Sikkink K. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. – International Organization. Vol. 52. No. 4. P. 887-917.

Froumin I., Leshukov O. 2015. National-Regional Relationships in Federal Higher Education Systems: The Case of Russian Federation. – Higher education forum Hiroshima University. No. 12. P. 77-94.

Globalizing Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action. 2012. Ed. by J.D. Clark. Oxon: Routledge. 194 p.

Hafner-Burton E.M., Kahler M., Montgomery A.H. 2009. Network Analysis for International Relations. – International Organization. Vol. 63. No. 3. P. 559-592.

Heclo H. 1978. Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. –The New American Political System. Ed. by A. King. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. P. 413-422.

Kaldor M. 2003. The Idea of Global Civil Society. – International Affairs. Vol. 79. No. 3. P. 583-593.

Keane J. 2003. Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 220 p.

Keck M.E., Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders, Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornel University Press. 228 p.

Kirpotin S.N., Callaghan T.V. et al. 2018. Russian–EU Collaboration via the Mega-transect Approach for Large-Scale Projects: Cases of Rf Federal Target Programme and SIWA JPI Climate EU Programme. – International Journal of Environmental Studies. Vol. 75. No. 3. P. 385-394. 33.2018.1429131

Marsh D., Smith M. 2000. Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. – Political Studies. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 4-21.

Process Tracing. 2015. Ed. by A. Bennett, J.T. Checkel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 329 p.

Rhodes R.A.W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University. 235 p.

Salmi J. 2009. The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Directions in Development; Human Development. World Bank. URL: License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.

Smolentseva A. 2015. Globalization and the Research Mission of Universities in Russia. – Higher Education in the BRICS Countries. Higher Education Dynamics. Vol. 44. Ed. by S. Schwartzman, R. Pinheiro, P. Pillay. Dordrecht: Springer.

The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. 2012. Ed. by A.M. Florini. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 295 p.


Degterev D.A. 2015. Net-analysis of International Relations. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. № 4. P. 119-138. (In Russ.)

Gutorov V.A. 2015. Politics and Education: Historical Tradition and Modern Transformations. – Polis. Political Studies. No.1. P. 9-29. (In Russ.)

Mikhailova O.V. 2013. Seti v politike i gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Networking in Politics and in Government]. Moscow: ID KDU. 332 p. (In Russ.)

Smorgunov L.V. 2001. Net-Approach Towards Politics and Government. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 103-112. (In Russ).

Setevoi analiz publichnoi politiki [Network Analysis of Public Policy]. 2013. Ed. by L.V. Smorgunov. Moscow: RG-Press. 320 p. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 5, 2021

See also:

Potyomkina O.Yu.,
On transnational territorial expanses and international regions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No4

Kochetkov A.P.,
Authority and elites in a global information society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Sergeyev K.V.,
“Peripheral Knowledge” in the Creativity Discourse: Social Nets of the Interesting. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No1

Pankevich N.V.,
Political strategy of russian urbanization: from world cities to a national net platform. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No1

Petrov S.I.,
STATE GOVERNANCE AND POLITICAL NETWORKS. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No4



   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991